Abstract
The evolution of the universe started from a hot and dense Big Bang point. Temperature fluctuation map of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation and initial seeds of large scale structures (LSS) are explained by an inflationary period in a very early time. Inflaton as quanta of the inflation field is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. Potentials of the self-interacting single field models are constrained by observational data as well as quantum gravity. Some forms of the potential are rolled out by data of Planck satellite and some of them by quantum gravity constraints. In the standard model of inflation or cold inflation firstly universe expands where the inflaton rolls the nearly flat part of the potential and in the second part, the universe reheats where the inflaton oscillates around the minimum of the potential which leads to thermalized radiation dominated universe. String theory as the best model of quantum gravity forbids the oscillation around the minimum of the potential during the thermalized epoch of the reheating. But in the warm model of inflation thermalization happens during the accelerated expansion of the universe where the inflaton rolls nearly steep potential and the universe will be radiation dominated without any separated reheating epoch.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev.D 23 (1981) 347 [INSPIRE].
A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett.108B (1982) 389 [INSPIRE].
A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (1982) 1220 [INSPIRE].
V.F. Mukhanov, H.A. Feldman and R.H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions, Phys. Rept.215 (1992) 203 [INSPIRE].
L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.73 (1994) 3195 [hep-th/9405187] [INSPIRE].
Y. Shtanov, J.H. Traschen and R.H. Brandenberger, Universe reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev.D 51 (1995) 5438 [hep-ph/9407247] [INSPIRE].
G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, de Sitter Space and the Swampland, arXiv:1806.08362 [INSPIRE].
S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan, Bounds on Slow Roll and the de Sitter Swampland, JHEP11 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1807.05193] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P.J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa, On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland, Phys. Lett.B 784 (2018) 271 [arXiv:1806.09718] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland, Phys. Lett.B 788 (2019) 180 [arXiv:1810.05506] [INSPIRE].
Y. Akrami, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and V. Vardanyan, The Landscape, the Swampland and the Era of Precision Cosmology, Fortsch. Phys.67 (2019) 1800075 [arXiv:1808.09440] [INSPIRE].
A. Achúcarro and G.A. Palma, The string swampland constraints require multi-field inflation, JCAP02 (2019) 041 [arXiv:1807.04390] [INSPIRE].
A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, A note on Inflation and the Swampland, Fortsch. Phys.66 (2018) 1800052 [arXiv:1807.05445] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef, A. Hebecker and T. Wrase, de Sitter swampland conjecture and the Higgs potential, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 086004 [arXiv:1807.06581] [INSPIRE].
S. Brahma and M. Wali Hossain, Avoiding the string swampland in single-field inflation: Excited initial states, JHEP03 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1809.01277] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Lin, K.-W. Ng and K. Cheung, Chaotic inflation on the brane and the Swampland Criteria, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 023545 [arXiv:1810.01644] [INSPIRE].
K. Dimopoulos, Steep Eternal Inflation and the Swampland, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 123516 [arXiv:1810.03438] [INSPIRE].
A. Ashoorioon, Rescuing Single Field Inflation from the Swampland, Phys. Lett.B 790 (2019) 568 [arXiv:1810.04001] [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Wang, Electroweak relaxation of cosmological hierarchy, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 023529 [arXiv:1810.06445] [INSPIRE].
Y. Olguin-Trejo, S.L. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala, Runaway Quintessence, Out of the Swampland, JCAP01 (2019) 031 [arXiv:1810.08634] [INSPIRE].
S.C. Park, Minimal gauge inflation and the refined Swampland conjecture, JCAP01 (2019) 053 [arXiv:1810.11279] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Lin, Type I Hilltop Inflation and the Refined Swampland Criteria, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 023519 [arXiv:1810.11992] [INSPIRE].
R. Schimmrigk, The Swampland Spectrum Conjecture in Inflation, arXiv:1810.11699 [INSPIRE].
Z. Yi and Y. Gong, Gauss-Bonnet Inflation and the String Swampland, Universe5 (2019) 200 [arXiv:1811.01625] [INSPIRE].
D.Y. Cheong, S.M. Lee and S.C. Park, Higgs Inflation and the Refined dS Conjecture, Phys. Lett.B 789 (2019) 336 [arXiv:1811.03622] [INSPIRE].
M. Ibe, M. Yamazaki and T.T. Yanagida, Quintessence Axion Revisited in Light of Swampland Conjectures, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) 235020 [arXiv:1811.04664] [INSPIRE].
J.J. Blanco-Pillado, M.A. Urkiola and J.M. Wachter, Racetrack Potentials and the de Sitter Swampland Conjectures, JHEP01 (2019) 187 [arXiv:1811.05463] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot and C. Roupec, Further refining the de Sitter swampland conjecture, Fortsch. Phys.67 (2019) 1800105 [arXiv:1811.08889] [INSPIRE].
V. Kamali, Non-minimal Higgs inflation in the context of warm scenario in the light of Planck data, Eur. Phys. J.C 78 (2018) 975 [arXiv:1811.10905] [INSPIRE].
W.H. Kinney, Eternal Inflation and the Refined Swampland Conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 081302 [arXiv:1811.11698] [INSPIRE].
W.-C. Lin and W.H. Kinney, Consistency of Tachyacoustic Cosmology with de Sitter Swampland Conjectures, JCAP10 (2019) 038 [arXiv:1812.04447] [INSPIRE].
M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Hernández-Jiménez and J.G. Rosa, Warm inflation within a supersymmetric distributed mass model, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 103520 [arXiv:1812.07296] [INSPIRE].
P. Corvilain, T.W. Grimm and I. Valenzuela, The Swampland Distance Conjecture for Kähler moduli, JHEP08 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1812.07548] [INSPIRE].
M. Scalisi and I. Valenzuela, Swampland distance conjecture, inflation and α-attractors, JHEP08 (2019) 160 [arXiv:1812.07558] [INSPIRE].
M.-S. Seo, de Sitter swampland bound in the Dirac-Born-Infeld inflation model, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 106004 [arXiv:1812.07670] [INSPIRE].
G. Arciniega, P. Bueno, P.A. Cano, J.D. Edelstein, R.A. Hennigar and L.G. Jaime, Geometric Inflation, arXiv:1812.11187 [INSPIRE].
R. Kallosh, A. Linde, E. McDonough and M. Scalisi, dS Vacua and the Swampland, JHEP03 (2019) 134 [arXiv:1901.02022] [INSPIRE].
E. Kiritsis and A. Tsouros, de Sitter versus Anti de Sitter flows and the (super) gravity landscape, arXiv:1901.04546 [INSPIRE].
L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brandenberger and A. Refregier, Dark Energy in the Swampland, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 123502 [arXiv:1808.02877] [INSPIRE].
A. Berera, Warm inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 3218 [astro-ph/9509049] [INSPIRE].
A. Berera and L.-Z. Fang, Thermally induced density perturbations in the inflation era, Phys. Rev. Lett.74 (1995) 1912 [astro-ph/9501024] [INSPIRE].
A. Berera, Interpolating the stage of exponential expansion in the early universe: A Possible alternative with no reheating, Phys. Rev.D 55 (1997) 3346 [hep-ph/9612239] [INSPIRE].
M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R.O. Ramos and J.G. Rosa, Warm Little Inflaton, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 151301 [arXiv:1604.08838] [INSPIRE].
V. Kamali, Warm pseudoscalar inflation, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 043520 [arXiv:1901.01897] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, arXiv:1807.06211 [INSPIRE].
A.H. Guth and S.H.H. Tye, Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 631 [Erratum ibid.44 (1980) 963] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Dolgov and A.D. Linde, Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett.116B (1982) 329 [INSPIRE].
L.F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M.B. Wise, Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology, Phys. Lett.117B (1982) 29 [INSPIRE].
J.H. Traschen and R.H. Brandenberger, Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev.D 42 (1990) 2491 [INSPIRE].
A.D. Dolgov and D.P. Kirilova, On particle creation by a time dependent scalar field, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51 (1990) 172 [INSPIRE].
L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Nonthermal phase transitions after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.76 (1996) 1011 [hep-th/9510119] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline and P.-A. Lemieux, Electroweak phase transition in two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev.D 55 (1997) 3873 [hep-ph/9609240] [INSPIRE].
S. Das, Note on single-field inflation and the swampland criteria, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 083510 [arXiv:1809.03962] [INSPIRE].
M. Motaharfar, V. Kamali and R.O. Ramos, Warm inflation as a way out of the swampland, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 063513 [arXiv:1810.02816] [INSPIRE].
S. Das, Warm Inflation in the light of Swampland Criteria, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 063514 [arXiv:1810.05038] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1902.00701
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Kamali, V. Reheating after swampland conjecture. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)092
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)092