Abstract
PURPOSE: The significance of anal sphincter injury from transanal inserted staplers was studied. A randomized, controlled comparison was made of anorectal manometry and clinical function after sigmoid colectomy (avoiding nerve injury from rectal mobilization), anastomosed by either transanal inserted stapler or biofragmentable anastomotic ring (avoiding anal manipulation). METHOD: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with sigmoid adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to transanal inserted stapler or biofragmentable anastomotic ring groups. Anorectal manometry and clinical bowel function assessment were performed by an independent blinded observer before surgery and six weeks and six months after surgery. RESULTS: At six weeks after surgery, there was significant impairment of mean anal resting pressures (mean impairment, 23 percent;P<0.001) and physiologic anal length (mean impairment, 31 percent;P<0.01) in the transanal inserted stapler group (27 completed the trial), but not in the biofragmentable anastomotic ring group (18 completed the trial). Pressures remained impaired at six months. When changes in the anal pressures were compared between groups, the mean anal resting pressure (P<0.001) and maximum squeeze pressure (P<0.01) at six weeks and mean anal resting pressure at six months (P<0.01) were significantly more impaired in the transanal inserted stapler group. Postoperative bowel function was not different between the two groups. Postoperative complications were similar. In the transanal inserted stapler group one patient died of anastomotic leak sepsis and one had wound infection; in the biofragmentable anastomotic ring group one patient died of myocardial infarct and one had wound infection. CONCLUSION: Direct injuries to the internal anal sphincter occurred after transanal inserted stapler but not biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomoses. Clinical function was not correspondingly affected, probably because of the adequate residual rectal reservoir after sigmoid colectomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 1996;83:978–80.
Ho Y-H, Low D, Goh H-S. Bowel function survey after segmental colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:307–10.
Ho YH, Wong J, Goh HS. Level of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma. Int J Colorect Dis 1993;8:170–4.
Carmona JA, Ortiz H, Perez-Cabanas I. Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum. Int J Colorect Dis 1991;6:108–10.
Ho Y-H, Chiang J-M, Tan M, Low JY. Biofeedback therapy for excessive stool frequency and incontinence following anterior resection or total colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1289–92.
Ho Y-H, Tan M. Biofeedback therapy for bowel dysfunction following low anterior resection. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997:299–302.
Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F, Tonelli F. What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:329–35.
Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiologic and clinical results of coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:1082–6.
Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson ME,et al. Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:259–63.
McDonald PJ, Heald RJ. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.
Nakahara S, Itoh H, Mibu R,et al. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA™ stapler for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:762–6.
Pederson K, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen HN, Jensen P, Mortensen PE. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:133–5.
Vassilakis JS, Pechlivanides G, Zoras OJ,et al. Anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:101–6.
Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holds-worth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.
Horgan PG, O'Connoll PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.
Molloy RG, Moran KT, Coulter J, Waldron R, Kirwan WO. Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:462–4.
Bubrick MP, Corman ML, Cahill CJ, Hardy TG Jr, Nance FC, Shatney CH. BAR Investigational Group. Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Am J Surg 1991;161:136–43.
Ho YH, Goh HS. Current value of anorectal physiology and biofeedback in clinical practice. Asian J Surg 1995;18:244–56.
Williams NS, Price R, Johnson D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on the function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980;67:203–8.
Keck JO, Shoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Rectal mucosectomy in the treatment of giant rectal villous tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:233–8.
Arnold MW, Stewart WR, Aguilar PS. Rectocele repair. Four years' experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:684–7.
Lee JF, Maurer VM, Block GE. Anatomic relations of pelvic autonomic nerves to pelvic operations. Arch Surg 1973;107:324–8.
Gaston EA. The physiology of fecal continence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1948;87:280–90.
Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1228–31.
Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6.
Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C,et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:480–7.
Wise WE Jr, Padmanabhan A, Meesig DM, Arnold MW, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR. Abdominal colon and rectal operations in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:959–63.
Griffen FD, Knight CD Sr, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr. The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations. Ann Surg 1990;211:745–51.
Laxamana A, Solomon MJ, Cohen Z, Feinberg SM, Stern HS, McLeod RS. Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1246–50.
Jarvinen HJ, Luukkonen P. Sphincter-saving surgery for rectal carcinoma. Comparison of two five-year periods from 1980 to 1989. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1991;80:14–8.
Burke ER, Welvaart K. Complications of stapled anastomoses in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: colorectal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis. J Surg Oncol 1990;45:180–3.
Varma JS, Chan AC, Li MK, Li AK. Low anterior resection of the rectum using a double stapling technique. Br J Surg 1990;77:888–90.
Kollmorgan CF, Meagher AP, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Mortensen JA, Illstrup DM. The long term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function. Ann Surg 1994;220:676–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by research grant number P013 from the Department of Clinical Research, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, YH., Tan, M., Leong, A. et al. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 89–95 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235189
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235189