Skip to main content
Log in

Use of commercially available monoclonal antibodies for immunoenzyme double staining

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An immunoenzyme double-staining method for the simultaneous detection of two cellular epitopes, using commercially available mouse monoclonal antibodies, is described. The method employs a combination of the suppression of endogenous biotin and two successive indirect techniques with a blocking step in between. The first indirect method involves an unlabelled monoclonal antibody followed by an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin. After a blocking step with normal mouse serum, the second indirect method is applied using a biotinylated monoclonal antibody followed by the visualization of this antibody by avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex (ABC) or rabbit anti-biotin and peroxidase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin in successive steps. Using these methods in combination with the introduction of dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate and tetramethylbenzidine as chromogens for peroxidase activity, two cellular epitopes could be distinguished clearly in tissue sections by the green-and violet-stained peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase activities, respectively. The expression of two epitopes on the same cellular constituent is outlined by the coappearance of both enzyme activities as a bluish-purple colour. This method allows for the simultaneous identification, localization and enumeration of two cellular epitopes. These can serve as parameters for a number of pathological processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, D. &Pettit, S. (1984) Endogenous avidinbinding activity in human lymphoid tissue.J. Clin. Pathol. 37, 223–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorsma, D. M. (1984) Direct immunoenzyme double staining applicable for monoclonal antibodies.Histochemistry,80, 103–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyum, A. (1964) Separation of white blood cells.Nature,204, 793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckel, P. &Zehelein, E. (1981) Expression of pseudomonas fluorescensd-galactose dehydrogenase inE. coli. Gene. 16, 149–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstone, M. S. (1962)Enzyme Histochemistry p. 267. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glezerov, V. (1986) Simultaneous detection of two lymphocyte surface antigens: combination of indirect and direct immunofluorescence methods with monoclonal antibodies.J. Histotechnol. 9, 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, S. M., Raine, L. &Fanger, H. (1981) Use of avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29, 577–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-Y. Zeismer, S. C. &Lazcano-Villareal, O. (1987) Use of azide and hydrogen peroxide as an inhibitor for endogenous peroxidase in the immunoperoxidase method.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35, 1457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D. Y., Abdulaziz, Z., Falini, B. &Stein, H. (1983) Single and double immunoenzymatic techniques for labeling tissue sections with monoclonal antibodies.Ann N.Y. Acad. Sci. 240, 127–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullink, H., Boorsma, D. M., Klein, J. C., Oosten-Dorp, R., Henzen-Logmans, S. C. &Scheper, R. J. (1987) A rapid and simple hapten conjugation method for monoclonal antibodies to be used in immunoenzyme single and double staining procedures.J. Immunol. Methods 99, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppema, S., Visser, L. &De Leij, L. (1983) Reactivity of presumed anti-natural killer cell antibody Leu 7 with intrafollicular T-lymphocytes.Clin. Exp. Immunol,54, 834–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberger, L. A. &Joseph, F. A. (1983) The unlabeled antibody method. Contrasting colour staining of paired pituitary hormones without antibody removalJ. Histochem. Cytochem 27, 1424–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidman, N., Janossy, G. &Bodger, M. (1981) Delineation of human thymocyte differentiation pathways utilizing double staining techniques with monoclonal antibodies.Clin. Exp. Immunol. 45, 457–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valnes, K. &Brandtzaeg, P. (1982) Comparison of paired immunofluorescence and paired immunoenzyme staining methods based on primary antisera from the same species.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 30, 518–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valnes, K. &Brandtzaeg, P. (1984) Paired indirect immunoenzyme staining with primary antibodies from the same species. Application of horse radish peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase as sequential labels.Histochem. J. 16, 477–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Loos, C. M., Das, P. K. &Houthoff, H. J. (1987) An immunoenzyme triple staining method using both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies from the same species. Application of combined direct, indirect and avidin-biotin complex (ABC) technique.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35, 1199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandesande, F. (1983) Immunohistochemical double staining techniques. InImmunohistochemistry, IBRO Handbook (edited byCuello, A. C.), pp. 257–72. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. S. &Warnke, R. (1981) Suppression of endogenous avidin-binding activity in tissues and its relevance to biotin-avidin detection systems.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29, 1196–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Loos, C.M., Van Den Oord, J.J., Das, P.K. et al. Use of commercially available monoclonal antibodies for immunoenzyme double staining. Histochem J 20, 409–413 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002426

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002426

Keywords

Navigation