Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that competition occurs in a community of three species of small mammals (Antechinus stuartii and A. swainsonii, Marsupialia; Rattus fuscipes, Rodentia) in south-eastern Australia. The hypothesis was tested by using a simple model of competition that is based on two premises: I. competition results in a negative numerical or a negative spatial association between species, and II. competition is more intense where the densities of the competing species are relatively high. The model combines both premises and predicts that measures of association between competing species will be more negative where the species exist at high population densities than derived from the model and applied to data gathered in two study areas with contrasting mean animal densities. There was no evidence of numerical association among the species (three tests), but evidence of negative spatial association (three tests our of four). These latter findings were consistent with the predictions of the model. All species preferred the same broad kinds of habitat (macrohabitat), but they segregated into smaller, finer grained patches (microhabitat) when their numbers were relatively high. Such segregation was more evident between the two species of marsupials than between either species of marsupial and the eutherian rat. These findings suggested that competition occurs by interference, and reinforce the idea that an understanding of the behaviour of individuals is important to understanding competition between species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky Z, Dyer MI, Harrison PD (1979) Competition among small mammals in experimentally perturbed areas of the shortgrass prairie. Ecology 60:530–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JL, How RA, Humphries WF (1978) The use of habitat components by small mammals in eastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 3:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR (1980) Behavioral aspects of competition in a three-species rodent guild of coastal southern California. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite RW (1973) An ecological study of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). M. Sc. thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite RW, Cockburn A, Lee AK (1978) Resource partitioning by small mammals in lowland heath communities of south-eastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 3:423–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1978) Effects of mammalian competitors on the ecology and evolution of communities. In: Snyder DP (ed) Populations of small mammals under natural conditions, vol 5. Special Publication Series, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburg, pp 52–57

  • Cohen MN, Malpass RS, Klein HG (eds) (1980) Biosocial mechanisms of population regulation. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole LC (1957) The measurement of partial interspecific association. Ecology 38:226–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack RM (1979) Spatial aspects of competition between individuals. In: Cormack RM, Ord JK (eds) Spatial and temporal analysis in ecology. International Cooperative Publ House, Fairland, Maryland, pp 151–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly M, Wilson MI, Behrends P (1980) Factors affecting rodents' responses to odours of strangers encountered in the field: Experiment with odour-baited traps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1978) Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interspecific competition. Am Sci 66:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1980) Niche shift and interaction among Antechinus. Bull Aust Mammal Soc 6:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1983) Competition and coexistence among the small marsupials of Australia and New Guinea. Acta Zool Fenn (in press)

  • Fager EW (1957) Determination and analysis of recurrent groups. Ecology 38:586–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton MB, Fleming TH (1976) Ecological interactions between bats and nocturnal birds. Biotropica 8:104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox BJ (1982a) Ecological separation and coexistence of Sminthopsis murina and Antechinus stuartii (Dasyuridae, Marsupialia): A regeneration niche? In: Archer M (ed) Carnivorous marsupials. Roy Zool Soc N.S.W., Sydney, pp 187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox BJ (1982b) A review of dasyurid ecology and speculation on the role of limiting similarity in community organisation. In: Archer M (ed) Carnivorous marsupials. Roy Zool Soc N.S.W., Sydney, pp 97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass GE, Slade NA (1980) The effect of Sigmodon hispidus on spatial and temporal activity of Microtus ochrogaster: evidence for competition. Am Midl Nat 86:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz GW (1971) An ecological study of Microtus pinetorum in Oklahoma. Am Midl Nat 86:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1971) Experimental studies of competitive interaction in a 2-species system. III. Microtus and Peromyscus species in enclosures. J Anim Ecol 40:323–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1972) Interspecific competition among rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:79–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1978) Competition between species of small mammals. In: Snyder DP (ed) Populations of small mammals under natural conditions, vol 5. Special Publication Series, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburg, pp 38–51

  • Hall S (1980a) The diets of two coexisting species of Antechinus (Dasyuridae, Marsupialia). Aust Wildl Res 7:365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall S (1980b) Diel activity of three small mammals coexisting in forest in southern Victoria. Aust Mammal 3:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall S, Lee AK (1982) Habitat use by two species of Antechinus and Rattus fuscipes in tall open forest in southern Victoria In: Archer M (ed) Carnivorous marsupials. Roy Zool Soc N.S.W., Sydney, pp 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes ML (1976) Odor as a possible isolating mechanism in sympatric species of shrews (Sorex vagrans and Sorex obscurus). J Mammal 57:404–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayne DW (1978) Experimental designs and statistical analysis in small mammal population studies. In: Snyder DP (ed) Populations of small mammals under natural conditions, vol 5. Special Publication Series, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburg, pp 3–10

  • Holbrook SJ (1978) Habitat relationships and coexistence of 4 sympatric species of Peromyscus in Northeastern New Mexico. J Mammal 59:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1969) A coefficient of interspecific association. Ecology 50:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1966) Demographic changes in fluctuating populations of Microtus californicus. Ecol Monogr 36:239–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1972) Ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomnicki A (1978) Individual differences between animals and the natural regulation of their numbers. J Anim Ecol 47:461–475

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M'Closkey RT (1981) Microhabitat use in coexisting desert rodents — the role of population density. Oecologia (Berl) 50:310–315

    Google Scholar 

  • M'Closkey RT, Fieldwick B (1975) Ecological separation of sympatric rodents (Peromyscus and Microtus). J Mammal 56:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (ed) (1976) Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihok S (1979) Behavioral structure and demography of subarctic Clethrionomys gapperi and Peromyscus maniculatus. Can J Zool 57:1520–1535

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RS (1967) Pattern and process in competition. In: Cragg JB (ed) Advances in Ecological Research No. 4. Academic Press, London New York, pp 1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH (1974) Genetic and social structure of feral house mouse populations on Grizzly Island, California. Ecology 55:747–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker RE (1973) Introductory Statistics for Biology. Studies in Biology No. 43, Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson O (1971) The robustness of estimating density by distance measurements. In: Patil GP, Pielon EC, Waters WE (eds) Statistical Ecology, vol 2. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1978) Evolutionary ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Press A (1976) Some aspects of the ecology and habitat utilisation of four species of native small animals. B. Sc. (Hons.) Thesis, Sydney University, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF (1974) Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition. Oecologia 17:245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974a) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974b) Competition and the form of habitat shift. Theor Pop Biol 6:265–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder GD, Rosenzweig ML (1975) Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilisation between Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami. Oecologia 19:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG, Roe A, Lewontin RC (1960) Quantitative Zoology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade NA (1976) Analysis of social structure from multiple capture data. J Mammal 57:790–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RAJ, Taylor LR (1979) A behavioural model for the evolution of spatial dynamics. In: Anderson RM, Turner BD, Taylor LR (eds) Population Dynamics. Blackwells, Oxford, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman MR (1974) Behavioral interactions between Microtus and Sigmodon: a model for competitive exclusion. J Mammal 55:705–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman MR (1978) Population dynamics of Microtus and Sigmodon in central Kansas. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 81:337–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1977) On competition and variable environments. Am Sci 65:590–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside DP (1983) The role of social behaviour and spacing in populations of the bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. C. R. Dickman

    Present address: Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK

  2. D. P. Woodside

    Present address: School of Zoology, University of New South Wales, 2300, Kensington, NSW, Australia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Australian National University, 2600, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    C. R. Dickman & D. P. Woodside

Authors
  1. C. R. Dickman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. P. Woodside
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickman, C.R., Woodside, D.P. A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia. Oecologia 60, 127–134 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379332

Keywords

Search

Navigation