Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematical Programming Studies ((MATHPROGRAMM,volume 25))

Abstract

This paper concerns a CPM network in which individual job times are random variables. Specifically the time for each job consists of a component which is a linear function of the investment (up to some maximum) in that job and a random variable that is independent of the investment. It is desired to find the minimum investment required as a function of expected project completion time. The problem is solved by a cutting plane technique in which the investment allocations yield feasibility cuts. Because of the special structure of this problem, these cuts can be generated by solving a sequence of longest path problems in an acyclic network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Birge and R.J.-B. Wets, “Designing approximation schemes for stochastic optimization problems, in particular for stochastic programs with recourse”, Working Paper 83-111, Internation Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Laxenburg, Austria, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.E. Dreyfus, “An appriasal of some shortest-path algorithms”, Operations Research 17 (1969) 395–412.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. B.C. Eaves and W. Zangwill, “Generalized cutting plane algorithms”, SIAM Journal on Control 9 (1971) 529–542.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. L.R. Ford, Jr. and D.R. Fulkerson, Flows in networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. F.S. Hillier and G.J. Lieberman, Introduction to operations research (Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.A. Jensen and J.W. Barnes, Network flow programming (John Wiley, New York, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. J.E. Kelley Jr., “Critical path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis”, Operations Research 9 (1961) 296–320.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. K.G. Murty, “Two stage linear programming under uncertainty: A basic property of the optimal solution”, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 10 (1968) 284–288.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D.M. Topkis, “Cutting-plane methods without nested constraint sets”, Operations Research 18 (1970) 404–413.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R.E. Trueman, Quantitative methods for decision making in business (Dryden Press, Chicago, IL., 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.M. Van Slyke and R.J.-B. Wets, “L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming”, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17 (1969) 638–663.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R.J.-B. Wets, “Programming under uncertainty: The equivalent convex program”, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 14 (1966) 316–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Richard W. Cottle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 The Mathematical Programming Society, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wollmer, R.D. (1985). Critical path planning under uncertainty. In: Cottle, R.W. (eds) Mathematical Programming Essays in Honor of George B. Dantzig Part II. Mathematical Programming Studies, vol 25. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121082

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121082

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00920-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00921-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics