Skip to main content

Single station real-time P and S phase pickers for seismic observatories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methods and Applications of Signal Processing in Seismic Network Operations

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences ((LNEARTH,volume 98))

Abstract

An automatic phase picker is required for real-time procedures to locate seismic events. We present a successful implementation at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) of an accurate P picker, based on a dual autoregressive modeling of the seismogram around the P phase. The method only requires a detection of the P phase, which in our implementation is provided by a simple STA/LTA ratio. In the second part of this chapter we describe a fast algorithm to identify and pick S wave energy. This approach combines classical polarization analysis and the discrete wavelet transform. Polarization analysis of the P wave arrival is used for initial rotation of the raw data into the radial and transverse components. The wavelet decomposition of the radial and transverse components are filtered with an adaptive noise reducing filter to select scales (frequency bands) containing the S wave energy. This step reveals the type of seismic signal: local, regional or teleseismic. To identify and pick the S wave onset a time-varying characteristic function, defining the degree and direction of polarization and the amount of transverse energy, is applied on the selected scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramovich, F. and Benjamini, Y., 1996, Adaptive thresholding of wavelet coefficients, Comp. Stat. Data Anal., 22, 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H., 1974, Markovian representation of stochastic processes and its application to the analysis of autoregressive moving average processes, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 26, 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R.V., 1978, Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 68, 1521–1531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R.V., 1982, Automatic phase pickers: their present use and future prospects, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, S225–S242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anant, K.S. and F.U. Dowla, 1997, Wavelet transform methods for phase identification in threecomponent seismograms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87, 1598–1612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aster, R. and Rowe, A., 2000, Automatic phase pick refinement and similar event association in large seismic datasets, Advances in seismic event location, 231–263, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M. and Kradolfer, U., 1987, An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 77, 1437–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C. and Kennett, B.L.N., 2000, Automatic phase detection and identification by full use of a single three component broadband seismogram, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. and Sax R.L., 1980, Seismic detectors: the state-of-the-art, Technical Report SSS-R-80-4588, La Jolla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bödvarsson, R., Rögnvaldsson, S. Th., Slunga, R. and Kjartansson, E., 1999, THe SIL data acquisition system—at present and beyond year 2000, Phys. Earth. Plan. Int., 113, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cichowicz, A., 1993, An automatic S phase picker, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H. and MacBeth, C., 1995, Automatic picking of seismic arrivals in local earthquake data using an artificial neural network, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 758–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H. and MacBeth, C., 1997, The application of back-propagation neural network to automatic picking seismic arrivals from single-component recordings, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15105–15113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies, I. Ten lectures on wavelets, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der, Z.A. and Shumway, R.H., 1999, Phase onset time estimation at regional distances using the CUSUM algorithm, Phys. Earth and Planet. Interiors 113, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoho, D.L., 1992, Denoising by soft thresholding, Tech. Rept. Dept. of Statistics, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, P.S. and Shearer, P.M., 1994, Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic picking algorithm, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84, 366–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, J.E., Manolakis, D. and Gendron, P., 1996, Development of a seismic event detection and identification algorithm based on wavelet transform, Seism. Res. Lett., 67, 2, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorenko, Y.V. and Husebye, E.S., 1999, First breaks—automatic phase pickings of P and S onsets in seismic records, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3249–3252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, E.A., 1965, Signal analysis using rectilinearity and direction of particle motion, Proc. IEEE 53, 1874–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, P., Ebel, J.E. and Manolakis, D., 2000, Rapid joint detection and classification with wavelet bases via Bayes Theorem, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 764–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D.J., Vernon, F.L., Pavlis, G.L., Hansen, R., Lindquist, K., Quinlan, D. and Harkins, M., 1998, Real-time integration of seismic data from the IRIS-PASSCAL broadband array, regional, seismic networks and the Global Seismic Network, EOS Trans. AGU, 79, 567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havskov, J. and Ottemöller, L., 1999, SeisAn Earthquake Analysis Software, Seismol. Res. Lett., 70, 5, 532–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L.B., 1996, Digital filters and signal processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, D.C. and Kennett, B.L.N., 1990, Three-component analysis of regional seismograms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 2032–2052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.E., A. Bittenbinder, B. Bogaert, L. Dietz and Kohler, W., 1995, Earthworm: a flexible approach to seismic network processing, IRIS Newsletter, 14, 2, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joswig, M., 1990, Pattern recognition for earthquake detection, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 170–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkevics, A., 1988, Polarization analysis of three-component array data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 78, 1725–1743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1997, Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications, Rev. of Geoph., 35, 4, 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvaerna, T., 1994, Accurate determination of phase arrival times using autoregressive likelihood estimation, Annali di Geofisica, 37, 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. 2000, Comparison of manual and automatic onset time picking, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 1384–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. and Kennett, B.L.N., 1999, Multi-component autoregressive techniques for the analysis of seismograms, Phys. Earth and Planet. Interiors 113, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magotra, N., Ahmed, N. and Chael, E., 1987, Seismic event detection and source location using single station (three-component) data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 77, 958–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat, S.G., 1989, A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Trans. Pattn. Anal. Mach. Intell., 11, 674–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalbetti, J.F. and Kanasewich, E.R., 1970, Enhancement of teleseismic body phases with a polarization filter, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 21, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita, Y. and Hamaguchi, H., 1984, Automatic detection of onset time of seismic waves and its confidence interval using the autoregressive model fitting, Zisin 37, 281–293 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousset, E., Cansi, Y., Crusem, R. and Souchet, Y., 1996, A connectionist approach for automati labeling of regional seismic phases using a single vertical component seismogram, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 681–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, J.N. and Hutt, C.R., 1983, A new event detector designed for the seismic research observatories, USGS Open-File Report 83-785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo, G. and Lo Presti, L., 1994, Application of wavelet transform for seismic activity monitoring, Wavelets: Theory, algorithms and applications. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oonincx, P.J., 1999, A wavelet method for detecting S waves in seismic data, Computational Geosciences, 3, 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Vernon III, F.L. and Lindberg, C.R., 1987, Frequency dependent polarization analysis of high-frequency seismograms, J. Geophys. Res., 92, B12, 12664–12674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko, V.F., Kushnir, A.F. and Savin, I.V., 1987, Statistical adaptive algorithms for estimation of onset moments of seismic phases, Phys. Earth and Planet. Interiors, 47, 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rioul, O. and Vetterli, M., 1991, Wavelets and signal processing, IEEE Signal Proc. Magazine, October 1991, 14–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R.G., Christoffersson, A. and Cassidy, F., 1989, Real-time event detection, phase identification and source location estimation using single station three-component seismic data, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 97, 471–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhm, A.H.E., Trampert, J., Paulssen, H. and Snieder, R.K. 1999, Bias in reported seismic arrival times deduced from the ISC bulletin, Geophys. J. Int. 137, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruud, B.O. and Husebye, E.S., 1992, A new three-component detector and automatic single station bulletin production, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 82, 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, J.C. and Olson, J.V., 1980, Some comments on the descriptions of polarization states of waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 61, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, R. and van Eck, T., 1999, Robust automatic P phase picking: an on-line implementation in the analysis of broadband seismogram recordings, Phys. Earth and Planet. Interiors 113, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, G. and Nguyen, T., 1997, Wavelets and filter banks, Wellesley-Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takanami, T. and Kitagawa, G., 1988, A new efficient procedure for the estimation of onset times of seismic waves, J. Phys. Earth, 36, 267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takanami, T. and Kitagawa, G., 1991, Estimation of the arrival times of seismic waves by multivariate time series model, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 43, 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, C., 1995, Characterization of seismic phases—an automatic analyser for seismograms, Geophys. J. Int. 123, 937–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, C. and Kennett, B.L.N., 1995, Towards the identification of later seismic phases, Geophys. J. Int. 123, 948–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, P., Barba, S., De Rubeis, V. and Di Luccio, F., 1999, Seismic signal detection by fractal dimension analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 89, 970–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetterli, M. and Herley, C., 1992, Wavelets and filter banks: theory and design, IEEE Trans. Signal processing, Vol. 40, No, 9, 2207–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. and Teng, T., 1997, Identification and picking of S phase using an artificial neural network, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87, 1140–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickerhauser, M. V., 1994, Adapted wavelet analysis from theory to software, IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, M., Aster, R., Young, C., Beiriger, J., Harris, M., Moore, S. and Trujilo, J., 1998, A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. and Takano, K., 1999, An artificial neural network approach for broadband seismic phase picking, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 89, 670–680. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A04BD016 00008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sleeman, R., van Eck, T. (2003). Single station real-time P and S phase pickers for seismic observatories. In: Methods and Applications of Signal Processing in Seismic Network Operations. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 98. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0117702

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0117702

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43718-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47914-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics