Abstract
Antidot superlattices represent a model system to study electron transport through a periodic potential. Starting from a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas a periodic array of potential pillars exceedings the Fermi energy in height can be fabricated by various technological means. Usually the electron mean free path is much larger than the lattice period while the Fermi wavelength is typically an order of magnitude smaller than characteristic features of the artificial superlattice. In this so-called classical ballistic transport regime pronounced maxima occur in the magnetoresistance being related to regular electron trajectories around groups of antidots. Theories based on the classical chaotic motion of the electrons in the antidot potential landscape are able to explain the experimental observations quantitatively. In a rectangular geometry the transport properties depend on the direction of the current flow with respect to the lattice orientation. If the electrons flow through the closely spaced antidots electron orbits around one, two or more antidots that are now symmetry allowed lead to maxima in the magnetoresistance. In contrast if the current flows through the wide open channels between the rows of antidots the magnetoresistance is only influenced by electron orbits whose cyclotron diameter is comparable in size to the large period of the lattice. Basic symmetry relations (e.g. Onsager’s relation) can be tested with these experiments. Since the antidot systems are so well understood in the classical limit the experiments can be used to play with various lattice symmetries. The basic results of these observations persist into the quantum mechanical regime. Finite antidot lattices are fabricated where an array of e.g. 9×9 antidots is surrounded by a square geometry. For very low temperatures, T<100 mK, electron-electron scattering is reduced and the phase coherence length of the electrons may exceed the size of the total systems. The classical commensurability oscillations are now superimposed by strong reproducible fluctuations that die out for large magnetic fields, at which the cyclotron diameter becomes smaller than the lattice period. A Fourier analysis reveals B-periodic features in the magnetic field regime where the electrons classically encircle groups of antidots. We find that the area, that can be calculated from the sequential addition of a flux quantum, corresponds to the area of the classical cyclotron orbit around a group of antidots. We argue that the electrons travel phase coherently along classical trajectories. In finite rectangular lattices this argument is supported by the fact that such B-periodic oscillations only occur in the current direction where transport is influenced by the respective classical orbit. We conclude that antidot superlattices represent a versatile system to study experimentally the crossover from classical electron trajectories to quantum mechanical wave functions.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)
B. L. Al'tshuler, JETP Lett. 41, 648 (1985).
B. L. Al'tshuler, V. E. Kravtsov, and I. V. Lerner, JETP Lett. 43, 441 (1986)
E. M. Baskin, G. M. Gusev, Z. D. Kvon, A. G. Pogosov, and M. V. Entin, JETP Lett. 55, 679 (1992)
C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, “Quantum Transport in Semiconductor Nanostructures”, Sol. State Phys. Vol. 44, H. Ehrenreich and D. Turnbull, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1991
G. Berthold, J. Smoliner, V. Rosskopf, E. Gornik, G. Böhm, and G. Weimann, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11350 (1992).
F. Bloch, Z. Physik 52, 555 (1928)
S. Block, M. Suhrke, S. Wilke, A. Menschig, H. Schweitzer, and D. Grützmacher, Phys. Rev. B 47, 6524 (1993)
M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1761 (1986)
E. Ditlefsen and J. Lothe, Philos. Mag. 14, 759 (1966)
K. Ensslin and P. M. Petroff, Phys. Rev. B 41, 12307 (1990).
K. Ensslin, K. T. Häusler, C. Lettau, A. Lorke, J. P. Kotthaus, A. Schmeller, R. Schuster, P. M. Petroff, M. Holland, and K. Ploog, “New Concepts in Low Dimensional Physics”, p. 45, eds. G. Bauer, F. Kuchar, and H. Heinrich (Springer, Berlin, 1992)
K. Ensslin, S. Sasa, T. Deruelle, and P. M. Petroff, Surf. Science 263, 319 (1992)
K. Ensslin and R. Schuster, in “III–V Semiconductor Quantum System”, editor K. Ploog, in print
H. Fang, R. Zeller, and P. J. Stiles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1433 (1989)
H. Fang and P. J. Stiles, Phys. Rev. B 41, 10171 (1990)
R. Fleischmann, T. Geisel, and R. Ketzmerick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1367 (1992)
R. Fleischmann, T. Geisel, and R. Ketzmerick, Europhysics Lett. 25, 219 (1994)
K. Forsvoll and I. Holwech, Philos. Mag. 9, 435 (1964) Gerhardts 1976 R. R. Gerhardts, Surf. Sci. 58, 227 (1976)
G. M. Gusev, Z. D. Kyon, V. M. Kudryashov, L. V. Litvin, Yu. V. Nataushev, V. T. Dolgoplov, and A. A. Shashkin, JETP Lett. 54, 364 (1991)
G. M. Gusev, Z. D. Kvon, L. V. Litvin, Yu. V. Nataushev, A. K. Kalagin, and A. I. Toropov, JETP Lett. 55, 123 (1992)
G. M. Gusev, P. Basmaji, D. I. Lubyshev, J. C. Portal, L. V. Litvin, Yu. V. Nastaushev, and A. I. Toropov, Workbook of the 6th International Conference on Modulated Semiconductor Structures, Garmisch, Germany, 1993, p. 949, Solid State Electronics, in print
F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991
see for example D. Heitmann, Surface Sci. 170, 332 (1986).
E. J. Heller, and S. Tomsovic, Physics Today, July 1993, p. 38
K. Hirakawa and H. Sakaki, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8291 (1986)
W. E. Howard and F. F. Fang, Solid State Electronics 8, 82 (1965)
K. Ismail, M. Burkhardt, H. I. Smith, N. H. Karam, and P. A. Sekula-Moise, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1539 (1991)
R. de L. Kronig and W. G. Penney, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 130, 499 (1931)
C. Lettau, M. Wendel, A. Schmeller, W. Hansen, J. P. Kotthaus, G. Böhm, G. Weimann, and M. Holland, Solid State Electronics, in print
P. A. Lee, Physica A 140, 169 (1986)
K. Y. Lee, D. P. Kern, K. Ismil, R. J. Haug, T. P. Smith III, W. T. Masselink, and J. M. Hong, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 1366 (1990)
A. Lorke, J. P. Kotthaus and K. Ploog, Superlattices and Microstructures 9, 103 (1991).
A. Lorke, J. P. Kotthaus, and K. Ploog, Phys. Rev. B 44, 3447 (1991)
A. Menschig, B. Roos, R. Germann, A. Forchel, and K. Pressel, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8 1353 (1990)
F. Nihey and K. Nakamura, Physica (Amsterdam) 184B, 398 (1993)
L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 38, 2265 (1931)
L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, H. L. Störmer, and K. Baldwin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1888 (1989)
for a review see K. Ploog, “Nato ASI Series, Vol. 170, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, eds. E. E. Mendez and K. von Klitzing, p. 43
F. P. Salzberger, Diploma Thesis, Universität München, 1993
A. Scherrer, M. L. Roukes, H. G. Craighead, R. M. Ruthen, E. D. Beebe, and J. P. Harbison, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 2133 (1987)
R. Schuster, K. Ensslin, J. P. Kotthaus, M. Holland, and S. P. Beaumont, Superlattices and Microstructures 12, 93 (1992)
R. Schuster, K. Ensslin, J. P. Kotthaus, M. Holland, and C. Stanley, Phys. Rev. B 47, 6843 (1993)
R. Schuster, K. Ensslin, D. Wharam, S. Kühn, J. P. Kotthaus, G. Böhm, W. Klein, G. Tränkle, and G. Weimann, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8510 (1994)
H. Silberbauer, J. Phys. C 4, 7355 (1992)
H. Silberbauer and U. Rössler, preprint
H. Silberbauer, P. Rotter, M. Suhrke, and U. Rössler, Proceedings of the Winterschool on “Interaction and Scattering Phenomena in Nanostructures”, Mauterndorf, Austria, eds. G. Bauer, H. Heinrich, and F. Kuchar, Semiconductor Science and Technology, in print
C. G. Smith, M. Pepper, R. Newbury, H. Ahmed, D. G. Hasko, D. C. Peacock, J. E. F. Frost, D. A. Frost, D. A. Ritchie, G. A. C. Jones, and G. Hill, J. Phys. C 2, 3405 (1990)
J. Spector, H. L. Störmer, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 967 (1990)
G. M. Sundaram, N. J. Bassom, R. J. Nicholas, G. J. Rees, P. J. Heard, P. D. Prewett, J. E. F. Frost, G. A. C. Jones, D. C. Peacock, and D. A. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7348 (1993)
G. Timp, A. M. Chang, J. E. Cunningham, T. Y. Chang, P. Mankiewich, R. Behringer, and R. E. Howard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2814 (1987)
T. J. Thornton, M. L. Roukes, A. Scherer, and B. P. Van de Gaag, Phys. Rev. lett. 63, 2128 (1989).
K. Tsubaki, T. Honda, and Y. Tokura, Surf. Science 263, 392 (1992)
H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, M. E. I. Brockaart, P. H. M. van Loodsrecht, B. J. van Wees, J. E. Mooji, C. T. Foxon, and J. J. Harris, Phys. Rev. B 39, 8556 (1989)
B. J. van Wees, L. P. Kouwenhoven, C. J. P. M. Harmans, J. G. Williamson, C. E. Timmering, M. E. I. Broekhaart, C. T. Foxon, and J. J. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2523 (1989)
R. A. Webb, S. Washburn, C. P. Umbach, and R. B. Laibowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2696 (1985)
D. Weiss, M. L. Roukes, A. Menschig, P. Grambow, K. v. Klitzing, and G. Weimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2790 (1991).
D. Weiss, K. Richter, A. Menschig, R. Bergmann, H. Schweizer, K. von Klitzing, and G. Weimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4118 (1993)
A. Yacoby, U. Sivan, C. P. Umbach, and J. M. Jong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1938 (1991) *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A00AX034 00008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schuster, R., Ensslin, K. (1995). Antidot superlattices: Classical chaos and quantum transport. In: Helbig, R. (eds) Festkörperprobleme 34. Advances in Solid State Physics, vol 34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0107528
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0107528
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-528-08042-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75337-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive