Skip to main content

A comparison of dominance mechanisms and simple mutation on non-stationary problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V (PPSN 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1498))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is sometimes claimed that genetic algorithms using diploid representations will be more suitable for problems in which the environment changes from time to time, as the additional information stored in the double chromosome will ensure diversity, which in turn allows the system to respond more quickly and robustly to a change in the fitness function. We have tested various diploid algorithms, with and without mechanisms for dominance change, on non-stationary problems, and conclude that some form of dominance change is essential, as a diploid encoding is not enough in itself to allow flexible response to change. Moreover, a haploid method which randomly mutates chromosomes whose fitness has fallen sharply also performs well on these problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Emma Collingwood, David Corne, and Peter Ross. Useful diversity via multiploidy. In Proceedings of International Conference on Evolutionary Computing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Corne, Emma Collingwood, and Peter Ross. Investigating multiploidy's niche. In Proceedings of AISB Workshop on Evolutionary Computing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jonathan Lewis. A comparative study of diploid and haploid binary genetic algorithms. Master's thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khim Peow Ng and Kok Cheong Wong. A new diploid sceme and dominance change mechanism for non-stationary function optimisation. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conor Ryan. The degree of oneness. In Proceedings of the ECAI workshop on Genetic Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kukiko Yoshida and Nobue Adachi. A diploid genetic algorithm for preserving population diversity. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature: PPSN III, pages 36–45. Springer Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Agoston E. Eiben Thomas Bäck Marc Schoenauer Hans-Paul Schwefel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lewis, J., Hart, E., Ritchie, G. (1998). A comparison of dominance mechanisms and simple mutation on non-stationary problems. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, HP. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V. PPSN 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056857

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056857

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49672-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics