Skip to main content

Inessential features

  • Invited papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1328))

Abstract

If one converts surface filters into context free rules, one has to introduce new features. These features are strictly nonlexical, and their distribution is predictable from the distribution of the lexical features. Now, given a (feature based) context free grammar, we ask whether one can identify the nonlexical features. This is not possible; however, the notion of an inessential feature offers an approximation. To arrive at a descriptive theory of language one needs to eliminate all the inessential features. One can measure the complexity of a language by the complexity of the formulae needed to define the distribution of inessential features.

This research has been carried out in collaboration with the Innovationskolleg ‘Formale Modelle kognitiver Komplexität’ (INK 12/A3) at Potsdam University, funded by the DFG. I wish to thank Jens Michaelis for many useful discussions. Thanks also to Hans Leiß and James Rogers for raising interesting questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Patrick Blackburn, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, and Maarten de Rijke. A Proof System for Finite Trees. In H. Kleine Büning, editor, Computer Science Logic '95, number 1092 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 86–105. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam Chomsky. Bare Phrase Structure. In Gert Webelhuth, editor, Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, pages 385–439. Blackwell, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin Goranko and Solomon Passy. Using the universal modality: Gains and Questions. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2:5–30, 1992.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus Kracht. Is there a genuine modal perspective on feature structures? Linguistics and Philosophy, 18:401–458, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus Kracht. Syntactic Codes and Grammar Refinement. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus Kracht. Tools and Techniques in Modal Logic. Habilitationsschrift, Department of Mathematics, FU Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus Kracht. On Reducing Principles to Rules. In Maarten de Rijke and Patrick Blackburn, editors, Specifying Syntactic Structure, pages 95–122, CSLI, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Rogers. Studies in the Logic of Trees with Applications to Grammar Formalisms. PhD thesis, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Rogers. Strict LT2: regular — Local: recognizable. this volume, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Retoré

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kracht, M. (1997). Inessential features. In: Retoré, C. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1328. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052150

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052150

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63700-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69631-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics