Skip to main content

Hypothesist: A development environment for intelligent diagnostic systems

  • Diagnostic Problem Solving
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1211))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A model of diagnostic reasoning based on the hypothetico-deductive reasoning strategies used by doctors is presented. The model includes strategies for confirming a likely diagnostic hypothesis, eliminating alternative hypotheses, and discriminating between competing hypotheses. There is also a mechanism for recognising when there is sufficient evidence to support a firm diagnosis. An implementation of the model in an environment providing integrated support for knowledge acquisition, diagnostic reasoning and explanation is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ADAMS, I. D., CHAN, M., CLIFFORD, P. C. et al. (1986). Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. British Medical Journal, 293, 800–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • CENDROWSKA, J. (1987). PRISM: An Algorithm for Inducing Modular Rules, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • de DOMBAL, F. T. (1991). Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • de DOMBAL, F. T., LEAPER, D., STANILAND, J. et al. (1972). Computeraided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. British Medical Journal, 2, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • de KLEER, J. and WILLIAMS, B. C. (1987). Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence, 32, 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELSTEIN, A. S., SCHULMAN, L. A., and SPRAFKA, S. A. (1978). Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOX, J., BARBER, K. D. and BARDHAN, K. D. (1980). Alternatives to Bayes? Methods of Information in Medicine, 19, 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORRY, G. A., KASSIRER, J. P., ESSIG, A. and SCHWARTZ, W. B. (1973). Decision analysis as the basis for computer-aided management of acute renal failure. American Journal of Medicine, 55, 473–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • KASSIRER, J. P. and KOPELMAN, R. I. (1991). Learning clinical reasoning. Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEMENZ, B. and McSHERRY, D. (1995) Computer-assisted learning through interaction with a model of diagnostic reasoning. International Conference on Initiatives for Change in Medical Education in Europe (MedEd-21), Vaals, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSHERRY, D. (1986). Intelligent dialogue based on statistical models of clinical decision making. Statistics in Medicine, 5, 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSHERRY, D. (1992). A domain independent theory for testing fault hypotheses. IEE Colloquium on Intelligent Fault Diagnosis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSHERRY, D. (1995) Hypothetico-deductive data mining. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, Dublin, 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSherry, D and McClean, S. (1995) Intelligent techniques for analysis of inconsistent and missing data in a distributed database environment. Proceedings of Intelligent Data Analysis 95, Baden-Baden, 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEARL, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • POPLE, H. E. (1982). Heuristic methods for imposing structure on ill-structured problems: the structuring of medical diagnostics. In Szolovits, P. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 119–190. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHORTLIFFE, E. H. and BARNETT, G. O. (1990). Medical data: their acquisition, storage and use. In Shortliffe, E.H. et al. (eds.) Medical informatics: Computer Applications in Health care, 37–69. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHORTLIFFE, E. H., BUCHANAN, B. G. and FEIGENBAUM, E. A. (1979). Knowledge engineering for medical decision-making: a review of computer-based clinical decision aids. Proceedings of the IEEE, 67,1207–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPIEGELHALTER, D. and KNILL-JONES, R. (1984). Statistical and knowledge-based approaches to clinical decision-support systems, with an application in gastroenterology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 147, 35–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZOLOVITS, P. and PAUKER, S. G. (1978). Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence, 11, 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZOLOVITS, P. (1980). The lure of numbers: how to live with and without them in medical diagnosis. In Statland, B.E and Bauer, S. (eds.) Computerassisted decision making using clinical and paraclinical (laboratory) data, 65–75. Mediad Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Elpida Keravnou Catherine Garbay Robert Baud Jeremy Wyatt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McSherry, D. (1997). Hypothesist: A development environment for intelligent diagnostic systems. In: Keravnou, E., Garbay, C., Baud, R., Wyatt, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029454

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029454

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62709-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68448-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics