Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns of teacher talk and children’s responses: The influence on young children’s oral language

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of teacher-child dialogue in facilitating young children’s language learning is well established in the research literature, with significant outcomes accrued from rich language use in the classroom (Shiel, Cregan, McGough & Archer, 2012). This study focuses on the opportunities teachers provide to engage children in talk during small group teaching sessions and considers teacher-child talk patterns, within and across preschool and school settings. The intention was to examine teacher talk behaviours that facilitate children’s language use and explore how teachers support children’s oral language development as they move from preschool to school. Teachers from a preschool and school setting serving children from a low socioeconomic region of outer western Melbourne in Victoria, Australia were invited to plan, implement, and record teaching interactions with small groups of children that specifically built on their oral language skills. This paper reports on the fine-grained analysis of the teacher-child talk patterns in two specific ways: (1) teachers’ talk behaviours, to review the discourse patterns used to foster young children’s language learning; and (2) the children’s responses, to ascertain the dialogic interplay that created opportunities for children’s talk and learning. The findings indicate that during talk where teachers were supporting children’s oral language, the teachers’ preference for closed questions that were directed toward the immediate stimuli resulted in limited responses from the children. This particular teacher-child talk pattern was dominant in both preschool and school settings. While the common teacher talk behaviours across both settings support the continuity of children’s learning, as they transition from preschool to school, there was little evidence of interactions that engaged children in rich dialogue to extend their oral language competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: M-IT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2008). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 91–114). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 1–16). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blikstad-Balas, M. (2016). Key challenges of using video when investigating social practices in education: Contextualization, magnification, and representation. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 14, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caissie, R., & Rockwell, E. (1993). A videotape analysis procedure for assessing conversational fluency in hearingimpaired adults. Ear and Hearing, 14, 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A., Rastle, K. & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19 (1), 5–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary years. Sydney, NSW.: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Mitchell, C., & Bowman, P. (2009). Optimising the use of available technology to support international collaborative research in mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 39–60). New York, NY: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M.M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15 (3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments (2009). Investing in the early years–A national early childhood development strategy. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Edwards, S., & Widdop Quinton, H. (2015). Child-framed video research methodologies: Issues, possibilities and challenges for researching with children. Children’s Geographies, 13 (3), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A. (2015). Relating students’ spoken language and reading comprehension. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38 (3), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2005). Teaching reading: Literature review. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeTemple, J.M. (2001). Parents and children reading books together. In D.K. Dickinson & P.O. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning language at home and school (pp. 31–51). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.K. (2011). Teachers’ language practices and academic outcomes of preschool children. Science, 333, 964–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.K., & Caswell, L. (2007). Building support for language and early literacy in preschool classrooms through in-service professional development: Effects of the Literacy Environment Enrichment Program (LEEP). Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22 (2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.K., Griffith, J.A., Golinkoff, R.M., & HirshPasek, K. (2012). How reading books fosters language development around the world. Child Development Research Volume 2012, Article ID 602807, 15 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/602807.

  • Dickinson, D.K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., PeisnerFeinberg, E.S., & Poe, M.D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (3), 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.K., De Temple, J.M., Hirschler, J.A., & Smith, M.W. (1992). Book reading with preschoolers: Co-construction of text at home and at school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson D.K., & Porche, M.V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82, 870–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.K., & Tabors, P.O. (2001). Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J.E., Stuart, M., & King, D. (2010). Supporting early oral language skills for English language learners in inner city preschool provision. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Groves, C., Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2014). Classroom talk: Understanding dialogue, pedagogy and practice. Sydney, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (2002). A sociocultural perspective on early literacy development. In S.B. Neuman & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 30–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U.H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman F. (2008). Teachers’ use of feedback in whole-class and group-based talk. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 131–150). London: Sage

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A.M. (2016). Video as method: Understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 27 (1), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S.B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11 (1), 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A.E., & Pianta, R.C. (2011). Effective teacher-child interactions and children’s literacy: Evidence for scalable, aligned approaches to professional development. In S.B. Neuman & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 308–321). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, A.H., Skibbe, L.E., & Foster, T.D. (2014). Exploring the variety of parental talk during shared book reading and its contributions to preschool language and literacy: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort. Reading and Writing, 27 (2), 287–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pace, A., Yust, P., Adamson, L., Bakeman, R., Suma, K., & Golinkoff, R. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children’s language success. Psychological Science, 26 (7), 1071–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26 (1), 55–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49 (1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievements in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., & Chen, H. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge about language: Issues of pedagogy and expertise. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35 (2), 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L.M., Mashburn, A.J., Hamre, B.K., & Pianta, R.C. (2008). Quality of language and literacy instruction in preschool classrooms serving at-risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konza, D. (2016). Understanding the process of reading. In J. Scull & B. Raban (Eds.), Growing up literate: Australian literacy research for practice (pp. 149–176). Melbourne, Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, A., Ginsborg, J., & Peers, I. (2002). Development and disadvantage: Implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37 (1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y.H., Snow, C.E., & Chang, C.J. (2012). Mother–child talk during joint book reading in low-income American and Taiwanese families. First Language, 32 (4), 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, N.M., & Petriwskyj, A. (2017). Understanding and supporting young writers: Opening the school gate. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42 (2), 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantei, J. & Kervin, L. (2018). Examining literacy demands for children during teacher-led episodes of reading aloud across the transition from Preschool to Kindergarten. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41 (2), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, S.L., Pence, K.L., Justice, L.M., & Bowles, R.P. (2008). Educators’ use of cognitively challenging questions in economically disadvantaged preschool classroom contexts. Early Education and Development, 19 (2), 340–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyles, J., Adams, S., & Musgrove, A. (2002). Using reflective dialogues as a tool for engaging with challenges of defining effective pedagogy. Early Child Development and Care, 172 (5), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E., Welsh, J.A., Trup, E.M.V., & Greenberg, M.T. (2011). Language delays of impoverished preschool children in relation to early academic and emotion recognition skills. First Language, 31 (2), 164–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S.B. (2001). The role of knowledge in early literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 36 (4), 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, A., Paatsch, L., & Scull, J. (2018). Video-based methodologies: The affordances of different viewpoints in understanding teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice that supports young children’s oral language. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 41 (5), 536–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhout, A., & O’Neill, D.K. (2013). Mothers’ complex talk when sharing books with their toddlers: Book genre matters. First Language, 33 (2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paatsch, L.E., & Toe, D.M. (2014). A comparison of pragmatic abilities of children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their hearing peers, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19 (1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40 (2), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pordes-Bowers, A., Strelitz, J., Allen, J., & Donkin, A. (2012). An equal start: Improving outcomes in Children’s Centres. London: UCL Institute of Health Equity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyett, P.M. (2003). Validation of qualitative research in the ‘real world.’ Qualitative Health Research, 13, 1170–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raban, B. (1999). Language and literacy as epistemology. In J.S. Gaffney & B.J. Askew (Eds.), Stirring the waters: The influence of Marie Clay, (pp. 99–111). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, B. (2014). TALK to think, learn, and teach. Journal of Reading Recovery, Spring, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivalland, J. (2004). Oral language development and access to school discourses. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27 (2), 142–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, J. & Garvis, S. (2015). Transition: A positive start to school, for the Department of Education and Training, Victoria. Melbourne, VIC: Monash University

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, J., Paatsch, L. & Raban B. (2013). Young learners: Teachers’ questions and prompts as opportunities for children’s language development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 7 (1), 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, G., Cregan, Á., McGough, A., & Archer, P. (2012). Oral language in early childhood and primary education (3–8 years). Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj, I. & Asani, R. (2015). The role of sustained shared thinking, play and metacognition in young children’s learning. In S. Robson & S. Flannery Quinn (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding (pp. 403–415). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Manni, L. (2008). ‘Would you like to tidy up now?’ An analysis of adult questioning in the English foundation stage. Early Years: The International Journal of Research and Development, 28 (1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. (1991). The theoretical basis for the relationship between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 6 (1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E., Tabors, P., & Dickinson, D.E., (2001). Language development in the pre-school years. In D.E. Dickinson & P. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language (pp. 1–26). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, S.A., & Whitehurst, G.J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Bondas, T., & Turunen, H. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, D.J., Lowman, J.I., & Martin, S.S. (2007). Language development in the years before school: A comparison of developmental assets in home and child care settings. Early Child Development and Care, 177, 719–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Ball, T. (2008). Exploratory talk and dialogic inquiry. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 167–184). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore, R., Chase, S.K., & Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University, Australia

    Louise Paatsch

  2. Monash University, Australia

    Janet Scull

  3. Deakin University, Australia

    Andrea Nolan

Authors
  1. Louise Paatsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janet Scull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Nolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paatsch, L., Scull, J. & Nolan, A. Patterns of teacher talk and children’s responses: The influence on young children’s oral language. AJLL 42, 73–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652028

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652028

Search

Navigation