Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational mobility within and between skill clusters: an empirical analysis based on the skill-weights approach

  • Published:
Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper applies Lazear’s skill-weights approach (2009) to analyze the specificity of skill combinations of various occupations and its effects on occupational mobility and wages. The results show that the more specific an occupation, the smaller the probability of an occupational change. We also identify clusters of occupations characterized by similar skill combinations and find that employees in specific occupations have a comparatively higher probability of changing occupations within a skill cluster than between skill clusters. Moreover, occupational mobility within a skill cluster results in wage gains, while between clusters it results in wage losses. Therefore, the acquired skill combination and the resulting skill cluster, rather than the occupation per se, crucially determines mobility. Thus, for educational policies, it is more important to study whether a skill cluster is sustainable than an occupation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: SAGE

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldenderfer, M. S. & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. SAGE University papers on quantitative applications in the social sciences, No. 07-044. Beverly Hills: SAGE

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H.; Levy, F. & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H.; Katz, L. F. & Kearney, M. S. (2006). The polarization of the U.S. labor market. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. & Dorn, D. (2009). This job is «getting old»: Measuring changes in job opportunities using occupational age structure. American Economic Review, 99(2), 45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghans, L. & Golsteyn, B. H. H. (2007). Skill transferability, regret and mobility. Applied Economics, 39(13), 1663–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J. (1989). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (2004). Education for all and the quality of education: a reanalysis. Background paper prepared for the Education for all global monitoring report 2005, The Quality Imperative

  • Clark, D. & Fahr, R. (2001). The promise of workplace training for non-college-bound youth: Theory and evidence from German apprenticeship. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 378. Bonn: IZA

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. B. & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, Mass.: Heath

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C.; Ludsteck, J. & Schönberg, U. (2009). Revisiting the German wage structure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 843–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyraud, F.; Marsden, D. & Silvestre, J. (1990). Occupational and internal labour markets in Britain and France. International Labour Review, 129(4), 501

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzenberger, B. & Spitz, A. (2004). Die Anatomie des Berufswechsels: eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme auf Basis der BIBB/IAB-Daten 1998/1999. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-05. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung

    Google Scholar 

  • Geel, R.; Mure, J. & Backes-Gellner, U. (forthcoming). Specificity of occupational training and occupational mobility: An empirical study based on Lazear’s skill-weights approach. Education Economics

  • Geel, R.; Mure, J. & Backes-Gellner, U. (2009). Berufliche Bildung und Mobilität: Erklärungen mit Hilfe des Skill-weights Approach. Empirische Pädagaogik, 23, 479–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeggel, K. & Zwick, T. (2009). Good occupation — Bad occupation? The quality of apprenticeship training. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 09-024. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M. & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: the rising polarization of work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1994). Is job training oversold? The Public Interest, 115, 91–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz-Hart, B. (2008). Erfolgskonzept «duale Berufsbildung» im Wandel, In: T. Bauder & F. Osterwalder (Eds.): 75 Jahre eidgenössisches Berufsbildungsgesetz. Politische, pädagogische, ökonomische Perspektiven. Bern: hep

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J.; Wan, C. K. & Turrisi, R. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(4), 467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambourov, G. & Manovskii, I. (2008). Rising occupational and industry mobility in the United States: 1968–97. International Economic Review, 49(1), 41–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambourov, G. & Manovskii, I. (2009). Occupational specificity of human capital. International Economic Review, 50(1), 63–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J. & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, D & Kumar, K. B. (2004). Skill-specific rather than general education: A reason for US-Europe growth differences? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 167–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P. (2009). Firm-specific human capital: A skill-weights approach. Journal of Political Economy, 117(5), 914–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontardi, M. R. (1998). Segmented labour markets: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(1), 63–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V.; Kent, J. T. & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, D. (1986). The end of economic man? custom and competition in labour markets. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L.; Apostle, R. & Clairmont, D. (1987). Segmented labour markets and the estimation of wage functions. Applied Economics, 19(12), 1603–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poletaev, M. & Robinson, C. (2008). Human capital specificity: Evidence from the dictionary of occupational titles and displaced worker surveys, 1984–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(3), 387–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G., Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. L. (1987). Occupational change, employer change, and the transferability of skills. Southern Economic Journal, 53(3), 702–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz-Oener, A. (2008). The returns to pencil use revisited. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61(4), 502–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagschal, U. (1999). Statistik für Politikwissenschaftler. München/Wien: Oldenbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, R. (2006). Qualifikationsspezifische Beschäftigungsperspektiven und berufliche Flexibilität, In: A. Frick & A. Wirz (Eds.) Berufsbildungsökonomie: Stand und offene Fragen. Bern: hep

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldrige, J. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regula Geel.

Additional information

This research is partly funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology through its Leading House on Economics of Education, Firm Behaviour and Training Policies. We thank the participants at the SASE in Paris, the TASKS-workshop in Nuremberg, the research seminars at the University of Zurich, and particularly Ed Lazear for helpful comments and suggestions. The data used in this paper from the «BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey» were collected by the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, BIBB) and the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, BAuA). The producers of the data do not bear any responsibility for the analysis and interpretation of the data in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geel, R., Backes-Gellner, U. Occupational mobility within and between skill clusters: an empirical analysis based on the skill-weights approach. Empirical Res Voc Ed Train 3, 21–38 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546496

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546496

Keywords

Navigation