Skip to main content
Log in

A Pedagogy Of Production: Craft, Technology And Outdoor Education

  • Refereed Article
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I discuss issues concerning pedagogical practice and inquiry in Outdoor Education raised by recognition that the human body inhabits a ‘technological lifeworld’. The intent is to challenge certain assumptions regarding interpretations of ‘experience’, the ‘environment’ and ‘the body’ in Outdoor Education practice. The theory and practice of Outdoor Education recognises that knowing becomes embodied through action. This process is often aided by pre-action focussing and post-action reflection. I argue that the stated educational goals of many Outdoor Education programs are made vulnerable due to the ‘hidden work’ of technologies encountered and inattention to the significance of technology in experience. The approach employed in this paper is to relate a brief overview of philosophical inquiry into technology and the body to the discussion of two exhibits (a spoon and a three-legged stool), both objects crafted by secondary school students as a part of their outdoor and environmental education. I conclude that human and environmental well being cannot be separated in the ‘technological lifeworld’ that humans are destined to inhabit, and that Outdoor Education must sustain a broad range of technologically mediated experiences of the environment through, with and in the body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bannister, (1999). The Melbourne Age, April, p.13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1991). Standing on Earth: Selected essays. Golgonooza Press, Ipswich, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A. (1993). Deep and Shallow Outdoor Education: Can we tell the difference. The Outdoor Educator, June, pp. 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G. (year unknown). The role of Outdoor Education for the 21st Century. The Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.9–12.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochbeerg-Halton, E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curl, A. Personal Communication (May 1st, 1999). Included with the permission of the author.

  • Ewert, A. (1989). Outdoor Adventure Pursuits: Foundations, Models and Theories. Publishing Horizons, Arizona, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freenburg, A. (1991). Critical Thoery of Technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, T. (1992). Green Hands Against Dead Knowldege. In Ioannou, N. (Ed), Craft and Society: An anthology of perspectives. Fremantle Arts Centre Press, Fremantle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, M. (1978). The one-straw revolution: an introduction to natural farming, Rodale Press, Emmaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. (Tenth Anniversary Edition), Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gideon, S. (1948). Mechanization Takes Command: A contribution to anonymous history. Norton and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1953). The question of technology. In D. Krell (1977) (ed), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings, Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idhe, D. (1983). Existential Technics, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idhe, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1987). A Sand County Almanac: And sketches here and there. (Special commemorative Edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, B. (1986). Arctic Dreams: Imagination and desire in a northern landscape. Picador, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, Z (2000). Crafting as a Practice of Relating to the Natural World. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, Spring 2000, pp. 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (1996). New Perspectives on Self, Nature and Others. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, Vol.1, No.3, pp.3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. (1996). Wood Dreaming: the spirit of Australia captured in woodturning, Angus and Robertson, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx. K. and Engels, F. (1972). The German Ideology, International Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K. (1990). Outdoor and Environmental Education: Diverse purposes and objectives. McMillan, South Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway, P. (1997). Bodies, things, identities and the aims of education. Inaugural Lecture, Middlesex University School of Education, June 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1962). Technics and Civilisation, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. (1996). Technology, Phenomenology and Educational Inquiry. The Australian Educational Researcher, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. (1997). Technics and Ecological Consciousness: Embodied morality and politics. Environmental Justice: Global Ethics for the 21st Century, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (1997). A Place of My Own: The education of an amateur builder. Della, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S. (1996). Redefining Outdoor Education: A Matter of Many Relationships. Journal of Environmental Education, Vol.17, No.3, pp.13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S. and Gass, M. (1997). Effective Leadership in Adventure Programming. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, D. (1968). The nature of art and workmanship. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1972). Small is Beautiful. Harpers and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawa, M. (1992). Poesis and Praxis: Craft, modernity, and the techne of architecture. In Ioannou, N. (Ed), Craft and Society: An anthology of Perspectives, Fremantle Arts Centre Press, Fremantle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattchow, B. (1999). A Feeling for Water: The body and the paddle. Journeys, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). Quoted in Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochbeerg-Halton, E. (1981), The Meaning of Things: Domestic symbols and the self, Cambridge University Press, New York.

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). The Abstraction of Industrial Work. In The Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power. Heinemann Professional Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He is currently competing a PhD in experiential approaches to ‘place’ in Outdoor Education. He has built many kayaks, canoes, paddles over the years and occasionally still finds time to turn a few bowls in his wood work shed. The rest of the time he enjoys spending with his family on their small Gippsland farm. He can be contacted by telephone: (03) 5122 6366 or fax: (03) 51226361 or e-mail Brian.Wattchow@education.monash.edu.au

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wattchow, B. A Pedagogy Of Production: Craft, Technology And Outdoor Education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 5, 19–27 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400730

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400730

Navigation