Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Personal Tendencies in the Selection of Decision-Making Strategies

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was hypothesized that strategy selection in decision making is dependent both on a basic tendency toward using a specific strategy and a cost benefit analysis that favors the utilization of a strategy that yields the highest net gain. In the present study, the influence of a priori tendencies on the selection of compensatory or noncompensatory strategies was tested. Twenty female student nurses participated in a decision making experiment, and, as hypothesized, a significant relationship was found between tendencies and actual utilization of decision strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BEACH, L. R., & MITCHELL, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEN ZUR, H., & BREZNITZ, S. J. (1981). The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica 47, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHRISTENSEN-SZALANSKI, J. J. J. (1978). Problem solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRONBACH, L. J. (1965). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper amp; Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • EINHORN, H. G. (1970). The use of non-linear non-compensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KREITLER, H., & KREITLER, S. (1981). Cognitive orientation: Expanding the scope of behavior prediction. In B. Maher & W. Maher (Eds.), Advances in experimental personality research, Vol. II. New York: Academic Press.

  • MCALLISTER, D. W., MITCHELL, T. R., & BEACH, L. R. (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAYNE, J. W. (1982). Contingent-decision-behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 382–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAYNE, J. W., BETTMAN, J. R., & JOHNSON, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 534–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • SVENSON, O. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 86–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TODA, M. (1976). The decision process: A perspective. International Journal of General Systems, 3, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TVERSKY, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZAKAY, D. (1984a). A trip to Paris or a trip to Rome? Context effects and stochastic decision making. The Psychological Record, 34, 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZAKAY, D. (1984b). The influence of perceived event’s controllability on its subjective occurrence probability. The Psychological Record, 34, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZAKAY, D., & WOLLER, S. (1984). Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. Ergonomics, 27, 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZELENY, M. (1976). The attribute dynamic attitude model. Management Sciences, 23, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zakay, D. The Role of Personal Tendencies in the Selection of Decision-Making Strategies. Psychol Rec 40, 207–213 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399559

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399559

Navigation