Abstract
To evaluate whether children with and without autism could exhibit (a) functional equivalence in the course of yoked repeated-reversal training and (b) reversal learning set, 6 children, in each of two experiments, were exposed to simple discrimination contingencies with three sets of stimuli. The discriminative functions of the set members were yoked and repeatedly reversed. In Experiment 1, all the children (of preschool age) showed gains in the efficiency of reversal learning across reversal problems and behavior that suggested formation of functional equivalence. In Experiment 2, 3 nonverbal children with autism exhibited strong evidence of reversal learning set and 2 showed evidence of functional equivalence. The data suggest a possible relationship between efficiency of reversal learning and functional equivalence test outcomes. Procedural variables may prove important in assessing the potential of young or nonverbal children to classify stimuli on the basis of shared discriminative functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BLANK, M. (1966). The effects of training and verbalization on reversal and extra-dimensional learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4, 50–57.
CAR, D., WILKINSON, K. M., BLACKMAN, D., & McILVANE, W. J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101–114.
CATANIA, A. C. (2007). Learning (4th ed.). The Cambridge Center Sloan Century Series in Behavior Analysis. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.
DICKSON, C. A., DEUTSCH, C. K., WANG, S. S., & DUBE, W. V. (2006). Matchingto-sample assessment of stimulus overselectivity in students with intellectual disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 447–453.
DUBE, W. V. (1991). Computer software for stimulus control research with Macintosh computers. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 28–30.
DUBE, W. V., & HIRIS, E. J. (1996). MTS v 11.6 [Software for research and education]. Waltham, MA: E. K. Shriver Center for Mental Retardation.
DUBE, W. V., McILVANE, W. J., MACKAY H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1987). Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 159–175.
DUBE, W. V., McILVANE, W. J., MAGUIRE, R. A., MACKAY H. A., & STODARD, L. T. (1989). Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 65–76.
DUN, L. M., & DUN, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
DUNN, L. M., & DUN, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
GALVÃO, O. F., BAROS, R. S., BRANDÃO, S., LAVRATI, C. M., SANTOS, J. R., BRINO, A. L. F., DUBE, W. V., & McILVANE, W. J. (2005). Extent and limits of the matching concept in Cebus apella: A matter of experimental control? The Psychological Record, 55, 219–232.
GIL, M. S. C. A., & OLIVEIRA, T. P. (2007). Identity matching-to-sample in the study of acquisition of conditional discriminations by infants. Manuscript submitted for publication.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes and P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
HEAL, L. W., Ros, L. E., & Sanders, B. (1966). Reversal and partial reversal in mental defectives and normal children of a comparable mental age. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 71, 411–416.
HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.
HOUSE, B. (1964). The effect of distinctive responses on discrimination reversals in retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 69, 79–85.
KASTAK, C. R., SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131–158.
KAUFMAN, M. E., & GARDNER, W. I. (1969). Transfer of training of learning sets in mental defectives: I. Discrimination reversal. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 801–803.
KAUFMAN, M. E., & PREHM, H. J. (1966). A review of research on learning sets and transfer of training in mental defectives. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 2, 123–149.
LEA, S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 263–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., BAROS, R. S., & McILVANE, W. J. (in press). A novel method for teaching the first instances of simple discrimination to nonverbal autistic children in a laboratory environment. The Psychological Record.
LIONELO-DENOLF, K. M., & McILVANE, W. J. (2003). Rebirth of the Shriver automated teaching laboratory. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 21, 12–17.
LIONELO-DENOLF, K. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and test symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 476–495.
McILVANE, W. J., & DUBE, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: Foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195–213.
McILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., KLEDARAS, J. B., IENNACO, F. M., & STODARD, L. T. (1990). Teaching relational discrimination to individuals with mental retardation: Some problems and possible solutions. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 283–296.
McILVANE, W. J., KLEDARAS, J. B., CALLAHAN, T. C., and DUBE, W. V. (2002). High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 189–198.
PLENDERLEITH, M. (1956). Discrimination learning and discrimination reversal learning in normal and feebleminded children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 88, 107–112.
PRIOR, M. R., & CHEN, C. S. (1975). Learning set acquisition in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 701–708.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SIDMAN, M., WYNNE, C. K., MAGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.
STEVENSON, H. W. (1973). Children’s learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
STODDARD, L. T., & SIDMAN, M. (1967). The effects of errors on children’s performance on a circle-ellipse discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 261–270.
TERRACE, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without “errors”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1–27.
URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1993). A test of comparison-stimulus substitutability following one-to-many matching by pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 745–759.
URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: retention, intertribal interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264–273.
VAUGHAN, W., Jr. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by FAPESP/PRONEX Grant 2003/09928-4 and FAPESP Grant 06/55848-0 (Experiment 1), by CAPES BEX0640/03-4 and CNPq 201155/2004 (Experiment 2), and by NICHD grants HD 39816 and HD 04147 (Experiment 2).
We thank Lidia Postalli for her assistance in Experiment 1 and Camila Domeniconi, Sarah Luthern, Jeff Kilpatrick, and Kerrilyn Lacerte for their assistance in data collection for Experiment 2. Manuscript preparation was supported by HD 04666.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lionello-DeNolf, K.M., McIlvane, W.J., Canovas, D.S. et al. Reversal Learning Set and Functional Equivalence in Children with and Without Autism. Psychol Rec 58, 15–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395600
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395600