Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Response Cost in Computerized Programmed Instruction

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Punishment improves discrimination learning, and programmed instruction is an elaborate form of discrimination training, so the present experiment assessed whether punishment also improves performance on programmed instruction. The cost of such improvement in terms of increased training time and dissatisfaction of subjects also was assessed. Three college students completed a computerized version of Holland and Skinner’s (1961) programmed text. One subject received a two-component multiple schedule within a reversal design, and two subjects received the same two-component multiple-schedule without a return-to-baseline phase. During baseline, subjects received 5¢ for each frame completed, regardless of whether responses were correct or incorrect. Multiple-schedule conditions were either baseline conditions or a loss of 5¢ for each incorrect response (punishment). Punishment improved performance by 10%, increased training time by 15%, and did not affect reported satisfaction. The most likely mechanisms for this improved performance are that punishment increased study time or the salience of stimuli. This experiment showed that punishment can improve performance by one letter grade without subject dissatisfaction or significantly increasing training time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BALABAN, M. T., RHODES, D. L, & NEURINGER, A. (1990). Orienting and defense responses to punishment: Effects on learning. Biological Psychology, 30, 203–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BOE, E. E., & CHURCH, R. M. (Eds.). (1968). Punishment: Issues and Experiments. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • BORRESEN, C. R. (1973). Reward, punishment, and reversal on a mirror-tracing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRACKBILL, Y., & O’HARA, J. (1958). The relative effectiveness of reward and punishment for discrimination learning in children. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 51, 747–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BRENT, D. E., & ROUTH, D. K. (1978). Response cost and impulsive word recognition errors in reading-disabled children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 211–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COSTELLO, J., & FERRER, J. (1976). Punishment contingencies for the reduction of incorrect responses during articulation instruction. Journal of Communication Disorders, 9, 43–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CROSBIE, J., & KELLY, G. (1993). A computer-based Personalized System of Instruction course in applied behavior analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 366–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CROSBIE, J., & KELLY, G. (1994). Effects of imposed postfeedback delays in programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 483–491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CUNNINGHAM, S. J., & KNIGHTS, R. M. (1978). The performance of hyperactive and normal boys under differing reward and punishment schedules. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DONAHUE, B., & RATLIFF, R. G. (1976). The effects of reward, punishment, and knowledge of results on children’s discrimination learning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 129, 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDGINGTON, E. S. (1982). Non-parametric tests for single-subject multiple schedule experiments. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAGO, G., & FOWLER, H. (1972). Facilitated discrimination learning as effected by response-contingent neutral and aversive stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 3, 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FOWLER, H., HOCHHAUSER, M., & WISCHNER, G. J. (1981). Facilitating stimulus effects of reward and punishment in discrimination learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 9, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FOWLER, H., SPELT, P. F, & WISCHNER, G. J. (1967). Discrimination performance as affected by training procedure, problem difficulty, and shock for the correct response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 432–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FOXX, R. M. (1984). The use of a negative reinforcement procedure to increase the performance of autistic and mentally retarded children on discrimination training tasks. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4, 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GETSIE, R. L, LANGER, P., & GLASS, G. V. (1985). Meta-analysis of the effects of type and combination of feedback on children’s discrimination learning. Review of Educational Research, 55, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, L. M., & TRAMONTANA, J. (1973). Discrimination learning of retarded children as a function of positive reinforcement and response cost. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 216–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HEMRY, F. P. (1973). Effect of reinforcement conditions on a discrimination learning task for impulsive versus reflective children. Child Development, 44, 657–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOGE, M. A., & STOCKING, R. J. (1912). A note on the relative value of punishment and reward as motives. Journal of Animal Behavior, 2, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOLLAND, J. G., & SKINNER, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, K. R., & RUSKIN, R. S. (1977). Behavioral instruction: An evaluative review. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KELLY, G., & CROSBIE, J. (1997). Immediate and delayed effects of imposed postfeedback delays in computerized programmed instruction. The Psychological Record, 47, 687–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • KULIK, J. A., JAKSA, P., & KULIK, C-L. C. (1978). Research on component features of Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • LESTER, D. (1979). Modern psychological theories of punishment and their implications for penology and corrections. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology, Methods, and Therapy, 25, 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARKLE, S. M. (1964). Good frames and bad: A grammar of frame writing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARKLE, S. M. (1990). Designs for instructional designers (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATTHEWS, B. A., & SHIMOFF, E. (1974). Human responding on a temporally defined schedule of point-loss avoidance. The Psychological Record, 24, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, F. D, MOFFAT, G. H., COTTER, P. D., & OCHOCKI, T. E. (1973). Verbal reinforcement conditions, task complexity, age and sex in children’s discrimination learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 531–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUENZINGER, K. F. (1934). Motivation in learning: I. Electric shock for correct response in the visual discrimination habit. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUENZINGER, K. F (1938). Vicarious trial and error at a point of choice: I. A general survey of its relation to learning efficiency. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 53, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWSOM, C., FAVELL, J. E., & RINCOVER, A. (1983). The side effects of punishment. In S. Axelrod & J. Apsche (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior (pp. 285–316). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OCHOCKI, T. E., COTTER, P. D., & MILLER, F. D. (1974). Verbal reinforcement combinations, task complexity, and overtraining on discrimination reversal learning in children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 90, 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PENNEY, R. K. (1967). Effect of reward and punishment on children’s orientation and discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 140–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PENNEY, R. K., & LUPTON, A. A. (1962). Children’s discrimination learning as a function of reward and punishment. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 449–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RATLIFF, R. G., & ROOT, J. R. (1974). Two-choice discrimination learning in children as a joint function of incentive level and punishment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 124, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REUTER, J. H., & CHUNG, H. S. (1988). The contribution of the rewarded and the nonrewarded stimulus in visual discrimination learning in mice. Behavioural Brain Research, 27, 269–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SEIGEL, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39, 947–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEPHENSON, H. W., WEIR, M. W., & ZIGLER, E. F. (1959). Discrimination learning in children as a function of motive-incentive conditions. Psychological Reports, 5, 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, G. T. (1974). Varied functions of punishment in differential instrumental conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TINDALL, R. C, & RATLIFF, R. G. (1974). Interaction of reinforcement conditions and developmental level in a two-choice discrimination task with children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRENT, J. T. (1983). Role of reinforcement and response cost in discrimination learning. Psychological Reports, 53, 207–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WARDEN, C. J., & AYLESWORTH, M. (1927). The relative value of reward and punishment in the formation of a visual discrimination habit in the white rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 7, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WISCHNER, G. J., FOWLER, H., & KUSHNICK, S. A. (1963). Effect of strength of punishment for “Correct” or “Incorrect” responses on visual discrimination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 131–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WITTE, K. L, & JOHNSON, R. K. (1973). Children’s discrimination learning as related to delayed punishment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 146–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WITTE, K. L., & GROSSMAN, E. E. (1971). The effects of reward and punishment upon children’s attention, motivation, and discrimination learning. Child Development, 42, 537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, J. C, & SMOTHERGILL, D. (1967). Observing behavior and children’s discrimination learning under delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 5, 430–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, PO Box 6040, Morgantown, WV, 26506-6040, USA

    Kevin J. Munson & John Crosbie

Authors
  1. Kevin J. Munson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Crosbie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Crosbie.

Additional information

The present experiment was reported in Kevin J. Munson’s Masters thesis. This research was supported by grants from West Virginia University’s Senate and Department of Psychology Alumni Fund. We are grateful to Phil Chase and Ray Shaw for providing helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munson, K.J., Crosbie, J. Effects of Response Cost in Computerized Programmed Instruction. Psychol Rec 48, 233–250 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395268

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395268

Search

Navigation