Skip to main content
Log in

A Systems Approach to Behavior II: The Ecological Description and Analysis of Human Behavior Dynamics

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This article explores the conceptual relations existing among experimental animal psychology, field ethology, and human clinical behavior modification, in order to generate a new methodology for descriptive analyses in ecological settings. Drawing upon a “systems” conception of learning and behavior maintenance, descriptive accounts of both behavior and behavioral control dynamics in the environment are emphasized by the model. Specific research conducted to illustrate and validate the approach is discussed. Research on all of the major parameters is presented, including cross-cultural and cultural change applications, in an effort to illustrate the method’s format and utility for analyzing human behavior in a variety of naturalistic settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARKER, R. G. 1968. Ecological psychology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIJOU, S. W., PETERSON, R. F., HARRIS, FLORENCE R., ALLEN, EILEEN, & JOHNSTON, MARGARET S. 1969. Methodology for experimental studies of young children in natural settings. The Psychological Record, 19, 177–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, B. B. 1970. Recognition of aspects of consciousness through association with Eeg alpha activity represented by a light signal. Psychophysiology, 6, 442–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, R. 1975. Heart rate, activity and activation in rats. Psychophysiology, 12, 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GARNER, W. R., HAKE, H. W., & ERIKSEN, C. W. 1956. Operationalism and the concept of perception. Psychological Review, 63, 149–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JONES, N. B. (Ed.) 1972. Ethological studies of child behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JONES, J. A. 1971a. Identifying reinforcers and contingencies: An anthropologist’s viewpoint. Educational Technology, 4, 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • JONES, J. A. 1971b. Operant psychology and the study of culture. Current Anthropology, 12, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. 1959. Interbehavioralpsychology. Bloomington: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLENSON, J. R. 1967. Principles of behavioral analysis. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • MULHOLLAND, T. 1972. Occipital alpha revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 176–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PAUL, G. L. 1969. Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In Cyril M. Franks (Ed.), Behavior therapy: appraisal and status. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAY, R. D., & BROWN, D. A. 1975. A systems approach to behavior. The Psychological Record, 25, 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAY, R. D., & BROWN, D. A. 1976. The behavioral specificity of stimulation: A systems approach to procedural distinctions of classical and instrumental conditions. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 11, 3–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, G. E. 1975. Biofeedback, self-regulation, and the patterning of physiological processes. American Scientist, 63, 314–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. 1966. Operant behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • THARP, R. G., & WETZEL, R. J. 1971. Behavior modification in the natural environment. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • ULRICH, R., STACHNIK, T., & MABRY, J. 1966. Control of human behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ULRICH, R., STACHNIK, T., & MABRY, J. 1970. Control of human behavior. Vol. II: From cure to prevention. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ULRICH, R., STACHNIK, T., & MABRY, J. 1974. Control of human behavior. Vol. Ill: Behavior modification in education. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERPLANCK, W. S. 1970. An overstatement on psychological research: What is a dissertation? The Psychological Record, 20, 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAHLER, R. G. 1975. Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 27–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WILLEMS, E. O. 1965. An ecological orientation in psychology. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 11, 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of the research reported here were supported by Grant No. GY-9325 from the National Science Foundation’s College Science Curriculum Improvement Program (CoSIP) to Rollins College. Additional support for the preparation of this report came from the Rollins College Faculty Research Grant funds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, R.D., Ray, M.R. A Systems Approach to Behavior II: The Ecological Description and Analysis of Human Behavior Dynamics. Psychol Rec 26, 147–180 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394375

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394375

Navigation