Skip to main content
Log in

Perseveration in Concurrent Performances by the Developmentally Retarded

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perseveration in choice behavior of retardates was defined as failure to match absolute and relative response rates to changes in relative reinforcement rates with concurrent schedules of reinforcement. 4 experiments showed that concurrent performances of retardates varied systematically as a function of type of schedule, schedule value, duration, and symmetry of changeover delays. Relative but not absolute response rates were proportional to relative reinforcement rates with long changeover delays. Increasing the changeover delay punished changeovers and reduced total reinforcement rates. Contrary to prediction, asymmetrical changeover delays disrupted rather than improved matching. The retardate’s response is similar to that of Weiner’s “one-behavior organism” even in concurrent situations by persisting in maladaptive response patterns until net gains or losses of reinforcement are made contingent upon changes in response patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BAUMEISTER, A., & BUTTERFIELD, E. 1970. Residential facilities for the mentally retarded. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIJOU, S. 1966. A functional analysis of retarded development. In N. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 1. New York: Academic. Pp. 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. 1966. Concurrent operants. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 213–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C., & CUTTS, D. 1963. Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 203–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DENNY, M. R. 1964. Research in learning and performance. In H. Stevens & R. Heber (Eds), Mental retardation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 100–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • GERJUOY, I., & GERJUOY, H. 1965. Binary choice sequences of retardates, normal children, and college students under random and pattern set instructions. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 69, 854–859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GERJUOY, I., & WINTERS, J. 1967. Response preference and choice sequences preferences: I. Regression to alternation. Psychonomic Science, 7, 413–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J. 1970. On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KOUNIN, J. 1941. Experimental studies of rigidity in normal and feeble-minded persons. Character Persona, 9, 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LABOUNTY, C., & REYNOLDS, G. 1973. An analysis of response and time matching to reinforcement in concurrent ratio-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 155–166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PLISKOFF, S. 1971. Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 249–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • POPPEN, R. 1972. Effects of concurrent schedules on human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 119–128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SANDERS, R. 1969. Concurrent fixed-ratio fixed4nterval performances in adult human subjects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 601–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHROEDER, S., & HOLLAND, J. 1969. Reinforcement of eye movement with concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 897–903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SHULL, R., & PLISKOFF, S. 1967. Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: Some effects on relative performance measures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 517–527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SILBERBERG, A., & FANTINO, E. 1970. Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 187–197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • STRIEFEL, S. 1972. Timeout and concurrent fixed-ratio schedules with human subjects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 213–220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WEINER, H. 1966. Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans. Psychological Reports, 18, 239–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEINER, H. 1970. Human behavioral persistence. The Psychological Record, 20, 445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIGLER, E. 1966. Research on personality structure in the retardate. In N. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 1. New York: Academic. Pp. 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the N. C. Department of Mental Health, Unc Faculty Research Council, and Grant #Hd-03-110 of the National Institute of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schroeder, S.R. Perseveration in Concurrent Performances by the Developmentally Retarded. Psychol Rec 25, 51–64 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394289

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394289

Navigation