Abstract
It is proposed that contiguity theory provides a base for specifying when Premack’s differential probability hypothesis (Premack, 1965) will and will not identify effective reinforcers. Four implications of contiguity theory for contingency management are discussed and illustrated by snowing how the contiguity implication has been applied to the contingency management of children and to the engineering of self-management of contingencies. Relationships between contiguity theory, the Premack principle, and reinforcement principles are discussed. It is concluded that propositions derived from these three sources are in agreement and can be tested in non-laboratory situations, particularly in the teaching of self-management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADDISON, R. M., & HOMME, L. E. 1966. The reinforcing event (RE) menu. NSPI J., V. 1, 8–9.
BERGER, R. J. 1965. A test of the Premack hypothesis with responses to audio and visual stimuli. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
ESTES, W. K. 1959. The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.) Psychology, a study of a science. Vol. 2, New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 380–491.
FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. 1957. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
GUTHRIE, E. R. 1952. The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.
HILGARD, E. R. 1956. Theories of learning. (2nd ed.) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
HOMME, L. E. 1956. Spontaneous recovery and statistical learning theory. J. exp. Psychol., 51, 205–212.
HOMME, L. E. 1964. Technical progress report no. 1, a demonstration of the use of self-instructional and other teaching techniques for remedial instruction of low-achieving adolescents in reading and mathematics. Submitted to U.S. Office of Educ., October.
HOMME, L. E. 1965a. Final report, a system for teaching English literacy to preschool Indian children. Submitted to U.S. Department of Interior, Contract No. 14-20-065001506, October.
HOMME, L. E. 1965b. Control of coverants, the operants of the mind. The Psychol. Rec., 15, 501–511.
HOMME, L. E., & C.deBACA, P. 1965. Contingency management on the psychiatric ward. Unpublished paper. January.
HOMME, L. E., C.deBACA, P., DEVINE, J. V., STEINHOST, R., & RICKET, E. J. 1963. Use of the Premack principle in controlling the behavior of nursery school children. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 6, 544.
HOMME, L. E., & KLAUS, D. J. 1962. Laboratory studies in the analysis of behavior. Albuquerque: TMI.
HOMME, L. E., & TOSTI, D. T. 1965. Some considerations of contingency management and motivation. NSPI J., IV, 7, 14–16.
JAMES, W. 1912. Talks to teachers on psychology: and to students on some of life’s ideals. New York: Henry Holt.
KANTOR, J. R. 1959. Interbehavioral psychology. Bloomington: Principia Press.
LOGAN, F. A., & WAGNER, A. R. 1965. Reward and punishment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
PREMACK, D. 1965. Reinforcement theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1965. Lincoln: U. of Nebraska Press.
SKINNER, B. F. 1938. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
SKINNER, B. F. 1953. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
SLACK, C. W. 1965. The therapy machine and other stories. Unpublished manuscript, January.
WYCKOFF, L. B. 1952. The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part 1. Psychol. Rev., 59, 431–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Homme, L.E. Contiguity Theory and Contingency Management. Psychol Rec 16, 233–241 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393664
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393664