Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching Intraverbal Behavior to Children with Autism: A Comparison of Textual and Echoic Prompts

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although echoic prompts may be effective for teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism, the performance of some children may become dependent on such prompts (i.e., the prompts cannot be eliminated). Recent research suggests that visual rather than echoic prompts may be used to teach children with autism a variety of skills and may facilitate independent performance. In the present study, an adapted alternating treatments design was used to compare the effects of using visual (textual) and echoic prompts on acquisition of intraverbal responses (answering questions) by 2 children with autism. The results indicated that the textual prompts were more effective than the echoic prompts. Implications for the use of visual prompts during instruction with children with autism are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlop-Christy, M. H., Le, L., & Freeman, K. A. (2000). A comparison of video modeling with in vivo modeling for teaching children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 537–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, A. S., & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition or intraverbal behavior in a six-year-old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, T. R., LeBlanc, L. A., & Sautter, R. A. (2007). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (Eds.). (1999). A work in progress: Behavioral management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: DRL Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 89–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McClannahan, L. E., & Krantz, P. J. (1997). In search of solutions to prompt dependence: Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules. In D. M. Baer & E. M. Pinkston (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 271–278). Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, M. L. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disorders. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, K. L., & Schreibman, L. (1994). Teaching daily living skills to children with autism in unsupervised settings through pictorial self-management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 471–481.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quill, K. (1997). Instructional considerations for young children with autism: The rationale for visually-cued instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 27, 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savner, J. L., & Myles, B. S. (2000). Making visual supports work in the home and community: Strategies for individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, J., Alper, S., Raschke, D., & Ryndak, D. (2000). Effects of using a photographic cueing package during routine school transitions with a child who has autism. Mental Retardation, 38, 131–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tissot, C., & Evans, R. (2003). Visual teaching strategies for children with autism. Early Child Development and Care, 173, 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G., Carnerero, J. J., & Perez-Gonzalez, L. A. (2006). Generalization of tacting actions in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 233–237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G., Donley, C. R., & Keller, J. W. (2000). Teaching children with autism to ask questions about hidden objects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 627–630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Vedora.

Additional information

This report is based on a thesis submitted by Laura Meunier to the Department of Counseling Psychology, Rehabilitation, and Special Education, Northeastern University, Boston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vedora, J., Meunier, L. & Mackay, H. Teaching Intraverbal Behavior to Children with Autism: A Comparison of Textual and Echoic Prompts. Analysis Verbal Behav 25, 79–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393072

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393072

Key words

Navigation