Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Deprivation, Presession Exposure, and Preferences on Teaching Manding to Children with Autism

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of at least 23-hr deprivation, 5-min presession exposure, and individual preference on the acquisition of mands were investigated in these studies. Two boys who were 2.5 years old and diagnosed with autism participated in the studies. Preference assessments were conducted to identify preference levels of various toys. Toys of various preferences were then assigned to either a 23-hr deprivation or 5- min presession exposure condition for mand training. Both deprivation and preference level affected acquisition of mands. Implications for teaching children to mand are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mentaldisorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. A., Wacker, D. P., Derby, K. M., Peck, S. M., Richman, D. M., Sasso, G. M., Knutson, C. L., & Harding, J. W. (2000). Evaluating the effects of functional communication training in the presence and absence of establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 53–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G, & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–532.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Drash, P. H., High, R. L., & Tudor, R. M. (1999). Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism. Analysis oj’Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C, Bowman, L. G, Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C, & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958). The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 56, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, J. M, Libby, M. E., & Graff, R. B. (2000). The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 85–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of Psychology: A Systematic Text in the Science of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H., Meyer, K. A., Knowles, T., & Shukla, S. (2000). Analyzing the multiple functions of stereotypical behavior for students with autism: Implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 559–571.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, K. P., Sherman, J. A., & Sheldon, J. B. (2000). Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 495–506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mithaug, D. E., & Hanawalt, D. A. (1978). The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 153–162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1993) Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. S., McSweeney, F. K., Smith, R. G, & McComas, J. J. (2003). Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 421–438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, J. W., Sundberg, M. L., Newhouse, L., & Spengler, S. M. (1994). Overcoming an autistic child’s failure to acquire a tact repertoire. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching Language to Children with Autism or Other Developmental Disabilities. Pleasant Hill: Behavior Analysts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A. (1991). Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 279–291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellie C. Hartman.

Additional information

We thank the children and families who participated in the studies. We also thank the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for funding this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartman, E.C., Klatt, K.P. The Effects of Deprivation, Presession Exposure, and Preferences on Teaching Manding to Children with Autism. Analysis Verbal Behav 21, 135–144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393015

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393015

Key words

Navigation