Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing and Direct Reinforcement in the Establishment of an Echoic Repertoire of Children Diagnosed with Autism

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many children with autism do not imitate adult vocalizations, an important skill in learning to talk. Pairing adult vocalizations with preferred stimuli has been shown to increase free-operant vocalizations but effects are temporary; thus, direct reinforcement may be necessary to establish durable vocal behaviors. In Experiment 1, directly reinforced echoic responses did not increase following stimulus-stimulus pairings in three children with autism. Similarly, pairings did not increase free-operant vocalizations in Experiment 2, a replication of Miguel et al. (2002). Experiment 3 demonstrated that shaping increased vowel frequency for one participant. Results suggest that variables are yet to be delineated that influence effectiveness of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on vocalization frequency and acquisition of a verbal operant following such pairings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1965). Child development: Vol. 2. Universal stage of infancy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bzoch, K. R., League, R., & Brown, V. L. (2003). Receptive-expressive emergent language test (3rd ed.}). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E. (1981). Contiguity, response strength, and the delay-reduction hypothesis. In P. Harzem & J. H. Zeiler, (Eds.), Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (pp. 169–201). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 15–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L. A., & Bondy, A. S. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Cherry Hill, NJ: Pyramid Educational Consultants, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galensky, T. L., Miltenberger, R. G., Stricker, J. M., & Garlinghouse, M. A. (2001). Functional assessment and treatment of mealtime behavior problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the International phonetic alphabet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, N. R. (1995). Kaufman speech praxis test. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. (1976). Speech and the hearing impaired child: Theory and practice. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. (1989). Foundations of spoken language for hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The me book. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, C. F., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2002). The effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on the vocal behavior of children diagnosed with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1990). Three-term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during first language acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 293–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 289–290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow & Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D., Jr. (1995). A behavior analytic view of child development. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Michael, J., & Sundberg, M. L. (1996). Automatic reinforcement and automatic punishment in infant vocal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 39–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S., & Bennett, G. M. (2000). Effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on conditioning vocal sounds as reinforcers. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 75–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara E. Esch.

Additional information

We would like to express our appreciation to Scott Gaynor for his conceptual contributions to this paper. Also, we thank our research assistants, Christopher Gioia, Breanne Armstrong, and Katie McCloud, for their help with this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esch, B.E., Carr, J.E. & Michael, J. Evaluating Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing and Direct Reinforcement in the Establishment of an Echoic Repertoire of Children Diagnosed with Autism. Analysis Verbal Behav 21, 43–58 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393009

Key words

Navigation