Abstract
Four adult humans were asked to asked to “find” and talk about a particular topic to a person in an adjoining room, and were instructed that they would hear a short beep (the only form of reply from the other person) when they were talking about the topic, or were “close” to the topic. In Session 1, the experimenter in the adjoining room presented the beeps in the manner of shaping, or the differential reinforcement of successive approximations, “toward” the designated topic. In Session 2, the same conditions were in effect but the experimenter was unable to hear the subject and the beeps were presented noncontingently in a way that roughly matched the frequency and distribution of presentations in Session 1. In Session 3, shaping conditions were again in effect but with a different topic than that designated for Session 1. Audio recordings were transcribed in a way that was designed to show the progress of shaping over time. These and additional forms of supporting data and accompanying rationale are presented and discussed in detail. Issues raised by the methodology and results of the experiment include the nature of the verbal operant, superstitious verbal behavior, and a variety of methodological issues relevant to the experimental analysis of ongoing or continuous verbal behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azrin, N., Holz, W., Ulrich, R., & Goldiamond, I. (1961). The control of the content of conversation through reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 25–30.
Braam, S. J., & Sundberg, M. L. (1991). The effect of specific versus nonspecific reinforcement on verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 19–28.
Catania, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cordova, J. V., & Koerner, K. (1993). Persuation criteria in research and practice: Gathering more meaningful psychotherapy data. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 317–330.
Day, W. F. (1971, September). Methodological problems in the analysis of behavior controlled by private events: Some unusual recommendations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. (Reprinted in Leigland, S. (Ed.) (1992). Radical behavorism: Willard Day on psychology and philosophy (pp. 13–58). Reno, NV: Context Press.)
Dougherty, M. A. (1980). Analyzing the concept of baseline and innovative methodology of the Redbook Study from a radical behaviorist perspective. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University, Sacramento.
Drash, P. W., & Tudor, R. M. (1991). A standard methodology for the analysis, recording, and control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 49–60.
Epstein, R. (1985). The spontaneous interconnection of three repertoires. The Psychological Record, 35, 131–141.
Ferster, C. B. (1979). A laboratory model of psychotherapy: The boundary between clinical practice and experimental psychology. In P. Sjoden, S. Bates, & W. Dockens (Eds.), Trends in behavior therapy (pp. 23–38). New York: Academic Press.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Galbicka, G. (1994). Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 739–760.
Greenspoon, J. (1955). The reinforcing effect of two spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 409–416.
Hayes, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog: Verbal reports and the analysis of rules. A review of Ericsson and Simon’s Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.
Hayes, S. C. (Ed.) (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenbarb, I. (1989). Rule following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191–220). New York: Plenum.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1966). Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 33–51). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Holz, W. C., & Azrin, N. H. (1966). Conditioning human verbal behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 790–826). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hyten, C. & Chase, P. N. (1991). An analysis of self-editing: Method and preliminary findings. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 67–81). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1991). Functional analytic psychotherapy: Creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York: Plenum.
Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1994). Improving cognitive therapy for depression with functional analytic psychotherapy: Theory and case study. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 305–319.
Leigland, S. (1989). On the relation between radical behaviorism and the science of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 25–41.
Leigland, S. (Ed.) (1992). Radical behavorism: Willard Day on psychology and philosophy. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Leigland, S. (1993). The case against physicalism in the analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 351–355.
Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1992). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it (4th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Michael, J. (1984). Verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 363–376.
Moore, J. (1991). A retrospective appreciation of Willard Day’s contributions to radical behaviorism and the analysis of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 97–104.
Ono, K. (1987). Superstitious behavior in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 261–271.
Place, U. T. (1991). Conversation analysis and the analysis of verbal behavior. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 85–109). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Rosenfarb, I. S. (1992). A behavior analytic interpretation of the therapeutic relationship. The Psychological Record, 42, 341–354.
Salzinger, K. (1991). Cognitive problems, behavioral solutions. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 183–196). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Salzinger, K., Portnoy, S., Zlotogura, P., & Keisner, R. (1963). The effect of reinforcement on continuous speech and on plural nouns in grammatical context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 477–485.
Simon, H. A., & Kaplan, C. A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1–47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458.
Skinner, B. F. (1932). On the rate of formation of a conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 274–286.
Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40–65.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291–294.
Skinner, B. F. (1948). ‘Superstition’ in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press/Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1976). Farewell, my LOVELY! Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 218.
Skinner, B. F. (1986). Some thoughts about the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 299–235.
Skinner, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Verplanck, W. S. (1955). The control of the content of conversation: Reinforcement of statements of opinion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 668–676.
Verplanck, W. S. (1992). Verbal concept “mediators” as simple operants. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 45–68.
Wilson, W. C., & Verplanck, W. S. (1956). Some observations on the reinforcement of verbal operants. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 448–451.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Comments by Jay Moore and David Schmitt on an earlier draft of this paper are greatly appreciated. Special thanks are also due to Mark Sundberg, H. McIlvaine Parsons, an two anonymous reviewers for detailed and constructive comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leigland, S. An experimental analysis of ongoing verbal behavior: Reinforcement, verbal operants, and superstitious behavior. Analysis Verbal Behav 13, 79–104 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392908
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392908