Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized instructional control and the production of broadly applicable relational responding

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 1996

Abstract

Two experiments examined the performance of preschool children in tasks requiring the generalized matching of faces to faces and names to faces tinder the control of instructional stimuli (background color) that specified the basis by which faces were to be matched on a given trial. The children first learned to recite all the names, and to select all the faces, in a fixed order (the forward order). They then learned to select the faces in response to their spoken names. When the faces appeared on a white background, subjects selected the face named. On a gray background, they selected the face whose name was next forward. Subsequently, over a series of tests, when subjects were presented with novel, but similar stimuli with the same names, and with completely novel stimuli with novel names, control by the white and gray background colors generalized. In the second experiment, on trials with the gray background, when the face bearing the next-forward relation was not present, the children learned to select an appropriate substitute (two faces forward). This performance also generalized to novel stimuli. Together with earlier findings, these data suggest that widely generalized relational matching performances may arise because the labels for these relations are generically and metaphorically extended tacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruner, J.S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. E. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, T. S. (1950). An experimental investigation of transposition as a function of the difference between training and test stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 552–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkron, B. (1984). Coding responses and the generalization of matching-to-sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkron, B. (1988). Generalization of delayed identity matching in retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 163–172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkron, B. (1989). Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 293–309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkron, B., & Colvin, V. (1992). Joint control and generalized nonidentity matching: Saying when something is not. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 1–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1969). The inside story. In B. F. Skinner, (Ed.), Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (pp. 269–297). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 43, 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant (HD 23123) from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Our appreciation to Pam Kisor, Director of the Anna Bing Arnold Children Center, for her help and cooperation in coordinating subject participation. Portions of this research were conducted by the second author, under the guidance of the first, in fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Science degree in the Applied Behavior Analysis Option in Psychology at CSULA.

An erratum for this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03392911

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lowenkron, B., Colvin, V. Generalized instructional control and the production of broadly applicable relational responding. Analysis Verbal Behav 12, 13–29 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392894

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392894

Navigation