Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguishing Between Applied Research and Practice

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavior-analytic research is often viewed along a basic-applied continuum of research goals and methods. The applied portion of this continuum has evolved in ways that combine applied research and service delivery. Although these two facets of applied behavior analysis should be closely related, more clearly distinguishing between them, particularly in how we conceptualize and conduct applied research, may enhance the continuing development of each. This differentiation may improve the recruitment and training of graduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. K., Hall, D. C., Pennypacker, H. S., Goldstein, M. K., Hench, L. L., Madden, M. C., Stein, G. H., & Catania, A. C. (1976). Lump detection in simulated human breasts. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M. (1981). A flight of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 85–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbrauer, J. S. (1979). Applied behavior analysis, service, and the acquisition of knowledge. The Behavior Analyst, 2, 15–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. S., Criswell, E. L., Pennypacker, H. S., Catania, A. C., & Adams, C. A. (1982). Major stimulus dimensions determining detection of simulated breast lesions. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buskist, W. F., & Miller, H. L. (1982). The analysis of human operant behavior: A brief census of the literature, 1958–1981. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 137–141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cherek, D. R. (1995). Brief reflections and predictions regarding the experimental analysis of human social behavior. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. M. (1982). Applied behavior analysis: An historical analogy. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 53–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, D. F., & Olivera, D. (1978). Cooperation, competition, and related social phenomena. In A. C. Catania & T. A. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and instructional processes. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. (1986). Auto correlation in behavioral research. In A. Poling & R. W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyten, C., & Reilly, M. P. (1992). The renaissance of the experimental analysis of human behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 109–114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M. (1983). EAHB special interest group: A brief history. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M. (1993a, May). Baer, Wolf, and Risley revisited: A new definition of applied behavior analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

  • Johnston, J. M. (1993b, May). Basic and applied research: Bifurcation or continuum. In J. Greenspoon (Chair), Integrating applied, basic, and conceptual work in behavior analysis. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

  • Johnston, J. M. (1993c). A model for developing and evaluating behavioral technology. In R. Van Houten & S. Axelrod (Eds.), Effective behavioral treatment: Issues and implementation (pp. 323–343). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. B. (1977). A review of the observational data collection and reliability procedures reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 97–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, L., & Ullman, L. P. (1965). Research in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (1992). Should we train applied behavior analysts to be researchers? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 83–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. L. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neuringer, C., & Michael, J. L. (1970). Behavior modification in clinical psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1986). The graphic analysis of data. In A. Poling & R. W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennypacker, H. S. (1981). On behavioral analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 159–161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pennypacker, H. S., & Iwata, M. M. (1990). Mamma Care: A case history in behavioral medicine. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 259–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (1985a). On the impact of human operant research: Asymmetrical patterns of cross-citation between human and nonhuman research. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 185–189.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (1985b). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poling, A., Picker, M., Gossett, D., Hall-Johnson, E., & Holbrook, M. (1981). The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis: Is it real and who cares? The Behavior Analyst, 4, 93–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., Martindale, A., & Kulp, S. (1975). An evaluation of time-sample measures of behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 463–469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., & Rockinson, R. (1978). On the inability of interval time sampling to reflect frequency of occurrence data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 531–532.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, A. C., Roberts, D. M., Slack, D. J., Repp, A. F., & Berkler, M. S. (1976). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 501–508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. R. (1995). The experimental study of social behavior: The past and the future. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherburne, T. R., & Buskist, W. (1995). Taking stock of the experimental analysis of human social behavior. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, L. P., & Krasner, L. (1965). Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R., Stachnik, T., & Mabry, J. (1966). Control of human behavior, Vol. 1. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, J.M. Distinguishing Between Applied Research and Practice. BEHAV ANALYST 19, 35–47 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392737

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392737

Key words

Navigation