Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Textbooks in learning and behavior commonly describe performance on fixed-ratio schedules as “break and run,” indicating that after reinforcement subjects typically pause and then respond quickly to the next reinforcement. Performance on variable-ratio schedules, on the other hand, is described as steady and fast, with few long pauses. Beginning with Ferster and Skinner’s magnum opus, Schedules of Reinforcement (1957), the literature on pausing under ratio schedules has identified the influences on pausing of numerous important variables, in particular ratio size and reinforcement magnitude. As a result, some previously held assumptions have been called into question. For example, research has shown that the length of the pause is controlled not only by the preceding ratio, as Ferster and Skinner and others had assumed (and as implied by the phrase postreinforcement pause), but by the upcoming ratio as well. Similarly, despite the commonly held belief that ratio pausing is unique to the fixed-ratio schedule, there is evidence that pausing also occurs under variable-ratio schedules. If such widely held beliefs are incorrect, then what about other assumptions? This article selectively examines the literature on pausing under ratio schedules over the past 50 years and concludes that although there may indeed be some common patterns, there are also inconsistencies that await future resolution. Several accounts of pausing under ratio schedules are discussed along with the implications of the literature for human performances, most notably the behaviors termed procrastination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alling, K., & Poling, A. (1995). The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 331–346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio, C. F., Lopez, F., & Nevin, J. A. (1995). The relation between postreinforcement pause and interreinforcement interval in conjunctive and chain fixed-ratio fixed-time schedules. The Psychological Record, 45, 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H. (1961). Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science, 133, 382–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Derenne, A. (2000). Progressive-ratio schedules: Effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 291–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Herpolsheimer, L. R. (1999). Averaging effects in the study of fixed-ratio response patterns. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 145–153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Leinenweber, A. (1994). Molecular and molar aspects of fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 11–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., Mikorski, J., & Schlund, M. (1992). Reinforcement magnitude and pausing on progressive-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 377–388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991). Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level: Can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E., & Schlinger, H. (1988). Determinants of pausing under variable-ratio schedules: Reinforcer magnitude, ratio size, and schedule configuration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, R. R., & Ruthven, A. J. (1984). The effects of contingency contracting on student performance in a PSI class. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 87–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capehart, G. W., Eckerman, D. A., Guilkey, M., & Shull, R. L. (1980). A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 61–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. K. (1968). Pause relationships in multiple and chained fixed-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 117–126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. K., Bonem, E. J., & Phelps, B. J. (1987). A comparison of response patterns on fixed-, variable-, and random-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 395–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. K., & Silverman, L. T. (1973). Altering the proportion of components in a mixed fixed-ratio schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 273–279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Derenne, A., & Baron, A. (2001). Time-out punishment of long pauses on fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 51, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derenne, A., & Baron, A. (2002). Preratio pausing: Effects of an alternative reinforcer on fixed-and variable-ratio responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derenne, A., Richardson, J. V., & Baron, A. (2006). Long-term effects of suppressing the preratio pause. Behavioural Processes, 72, 32–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. R., Barnett, C. D., & Pryer, M. W. (1960). Operant behavior in mental defectives: Exploratory studies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 63–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, M., & Lyon, D. O. (1966). The post-reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 131–134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galuska, C. M., Wade-Galuska, T., Woods, J. H., & Winger, G. (2007). Fixed-ratio schedules of cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys: Joint control of responding by past and upcoming doses. Behavioural Pharmacology, 18, 171–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (1982). Minority students’ self-control of procrastination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. R., & Thompson, T. (1973). The post-reinforcement pause: A misnomer. The Psychological Record, 23, 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, H. C. (2005). The three-contingency model of self-management Unpublished doctoral disseration, Western Michigan University.

  • Harzem, P., & Harzem, A. L. (1981). Discrimination, inhibition, and simultaneous association of stimulus properties. In P. Harzem & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (pp. 81–128). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzem, P., Lowe, C. F., & Davey, G. C. L. (1975). Aftereffects of reinforcement magnitude: Dependence on context. Quarterly Journal of Experimemental Psychology, 27, 579–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, D., & Bruner, J. S. (1972). Infant sucking in response to variations in schedules of feeding reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 240–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodos, W. (1960). Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science, 34, 943–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodos, W., & Kaiman, G (1963). Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis Behavior, 6, 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. G (1958). Human vigilance: The rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science, 128, 61–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Watson, D. C., Powell, R. A., & Buro, K. (2006). Academic procrastination: The pattern and correlates of behavioural postponement. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1519–1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, R. R., & Azrin, N. H. (1961). Conditioning of mental-hospital patients to fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 87–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen, P. (1969). Reinforcement frequency and contingency as factors in fixed-ratio behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 391–395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lamwers, L. L., & Jazwinski, C. H. (1989). A comparison of three strategies to reduce student procrastination in PSI. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A. (1991). Scheduling positive reinforcers. In I. H. Iversen & L. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior (pp. 87–134). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A., Reilly, M. P., & Kohn, J. P. (1998). Response persistence under ratio and interval reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 165–183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J. C. (1996). Principles of behaviour analysis. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, E. R., Hammack, J. T., May, F., & Campbell, B. J. (1958). Intermittent reinforcement of operant behavior in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 315–339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F., Davey, G. C. L., & Harzem, P. (1974). Effects of reinforcement magnitude on interval and ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis Behavior, 22, 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (1966). The effects of prefeeding in plain and chained fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 4, 285–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1982). A molecular approach to ratio schedule performance. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 2. Matching and maximizing accounts (pp. 79–110). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1996). Procrastination by pigeons: Preference for larger, more delayed work requirements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 159–171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1998). Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 185–197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (2006). Learning and behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E., & Hyslop, M. E. (1982). Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout. Journal of the Experimental Analysis Behavior, 38, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. C. (1971). Percentage reinforcement of fixed-ratio and variable-interval performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis Behavior, 15, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. H., & Dews, P. B. (2002). Foreword to Schedules of Reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 313–317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, R., & Bijou, S. W. (1960). Single and multiple schedules of reinforcement in developmentally retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 339–348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (2003). Negative effects of positive reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 1–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M., & Courtney, K. (1992). Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 33–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M., Perone, C. L., & Baron, A. (1987). Inhibition by reinforcement: Effects of reinforcer magnitude and timeout on fixed ratio pausing. The Psychological Record, 37, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. W. (1968). The effects of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 589–593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. W. (1969). The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 605–608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Priddle-Higson, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Harzem, P. (1976). Aftereffects of reinforcement on variable-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 347–354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, R. M. (1969). Concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-interval performances in adult human subjects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 601–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H., Blakely, E., & Kaczor, T. (1990). Pausing under variable-ratio schedules: Interaction of reinforcer magnitude, variable-ratio size, and lowest ratio. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 133–139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Senécal, C., Lavoie, K., & Koestner, R. (1997). Trait and situational factors in procrastination: An interactional model. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 889–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, R. L. (1979). The post-reinforcement pause: Some implications for the correlational law of effect. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behaviour: Vol. 1. Reinforcement and the organization of behaviour (pp. 193–221). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, R. L., & Lawrence, P. S. (1998). Reinforcement: Schedule performance. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 95–129). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Stebbins, W. C. (1954). Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 114–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1949). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 503–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. V. (1974). Changes in progressive-ratio performance under increased pressures of air. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 553–562.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. M. (1964). Escape from SD associated with reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Galuska, T., Perone, M., & Wirth, O. (2005). Effects of past and upcoming response-force requirements on fixed-ratio pausing. Behavioural Processes, 68, 91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, I. (1977). Self-control techniques of famous novelists. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 515–525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. F., & Mulder, D. W. (1973). Fixed-ratio responding with human subjects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 359–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1964). Response cost and fixed-ratio performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 79–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1966). Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans. Psychological Reports, 18, 239–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, P., & Fink, E. (1966). Fixed ratio and extinction performance of infants in the second year of life. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 105–109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wesp, R. (1986). Reducing procrastination through required course involvement. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 128–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. C., Saunders, K. J., & Perone, M. (in press). Extended pausing in human subjects on multiple fixed-ratio schedules with varied reinforcer magnitude and response requirements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

  • Williams, R. A., & Shull, R. L. (1982). Differential reinforcement of short post-reinforcement pauses on a fixed-ratio schedule. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 2, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. D. (1970). Time limits for completing fixed ratios. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 275–286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. D. (1984). The sleeping giant: Reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 485–493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. D., & Kelly, C. A. (1969). Fixed-ratio and fixed-interval schedules of cartoon presentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziesat, H. A., Rosenthal, T. L., & White, G. M. (1978). Behavioral self-control in treating procrastination of studying. Psychological Reports, 42, 59–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles, 5151, USA

    Henry D. Schlinger

  2. Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Box 8380, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202, USA

    Adam Derenne

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201, USA

    Alan Baron

Authors
  1. Henry D. Schlinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam Derenne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan Baron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Henry D. Schlinger, Adam Derenne or Alan Baron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlinger, H.D., Derenne, A. & Baron, A. What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement. BEHAV ANALYST 31, 39–60 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392160

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392160

Key words

Search

Navigation