Abstract
Behavior analysis and institutional economics are viewed as having common origins in the early 20th century effort to benefit from the conceptual revolution spurred by Darwin’s synthesis. Institutional economics, initiated by Thorstein Veblen, appears to have failed to develop a progressive scientific technology, while behavior analysis has done so. It is suggested that institutional economics has been held back by lack of a synthesizing scientific mechanism that elucidates the relation between technological and ceremonial processes, the two cultural forces described by Veblen. The theory of institutional economist C. E. Ayres, built on Veblen’s distinction, is used to clarify the concepts of technological and ceremonial processes for the reader. An analysis of the behavioral processes that might underlie the cultural processes described by Veblen/Ayres suggests that the experimental analysis of behavior has provided concepts that might function as a synthesizing mechanism for the social sciences and, in particular, institutional economics. The Veblen/Ayres dichotomy, now seen in terms of underlying behavioral processes, is used to examine the field of behavior analysis in terms of its origins, its relation to psychology and its current state. The paper concludes with a few practical suggestions as to how behavior analysts might work to enhance survival.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayres, C. E. (1944/1962). The theory of economic progress. New York: Schocken Books.
Baer, D. M. (1981). A flight of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 85–91.
Baer, D. M. (1984). Ten is a little young to leave home, but pretty soon…. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.
Barzun, J. (1941). Darwin, Marx, Wagner: Critique of a heritage. New York: Little, Brown & Co.
Branch, M. N., & Malagodi, E. F. (1980). Where have all the behaviorists gone? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 31–38.
Cohen, M.R.,& Nagel, E. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York & Burlingame: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.
Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago, London: Open Court Publishing Co.
Dewey, J. (1928). Body and mind. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 4, 3–19.
Dewey, J. (1940). Education today. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
Freud, S. (1957). A general selection from the works of Sigmund Freud (edited by J. Rickman, with an appendix by C. Brenner). New York: Liveright Publishing Corp.
Freud, S. (1966). The complete introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: W. W. Norton.
Glick, T. F. (1974). The comparative reception of Darwin. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Himmelfarb, G. (1959/1962). Darwin and the Darwinian revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co. Anchor Books.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hull, C. L., Hovland, C. I., Ross, R. T., Hall, M., Perkins, D. T., & Fitch, F. B. (1940). Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Irvine, W. (1955). Apes, angels, and Victorians: The story of Darwin, Huxley, and evolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kantor, J. R. (1924, 1926). The principles of psychology, Vols. 1 and 2. Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.
Krantz, D. (1972). Schools and systems: The mutual isolation of operant and non-operant psychology as a case study. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8, 86–102.
Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of western thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lerner, M. (Ed.). (1948). The portable Veblen. New York: The Viking Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Michael, J. L. (1981). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–22.
Montessori, M. (1955). The formation of man. Adyar, India: The Theosophical Publishing House.
Morris, E. K. (1982). Some relationships between interbehavioral psychology and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 10, 187–216.
Morse, L. A., & Bruns, B. J. (1983). Nurturing behavior repertoires within a nonsupportive environment. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 19–25.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1980). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–9.
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden Two. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulativerecord (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1982). Contrived reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 3–8.
Sturgeon, J. I. (1984). Induction and instrumetalism in institutional thought. Journal of Economic Issues, 18, 599–609.
Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1983). Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 153–160.
Veblen, T. (1898/1919). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? In The place of science in modern civilization and other essays. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
Veblen, T. (1899/1934). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: The Modern Library.
Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glenn, S.S. Some Reciprocal Roles between Behavior Analysis and Institutional Economics in Post-Darwinian Science. BEHAV ANALYST 8, 15–27 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391909
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391909