Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On The Alleged Incompatibility of Analysis and Application: A Response To Pierce and Epling

  • In Response
  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbrauer, J. S. Applied behavior analysis, service and the acquisition of knowledge. The Behavior Analyst, 1979, 2, 15–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (Chair), Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis; Ten years later. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, May 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A. & Solnick, J. V. The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1980, 13, 275–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd. ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. D. & Epling, W. F. What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst. 1980, 3, 1–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Laurel House Society, 1896 West 15th Ave., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6J 2L1

    Thomas S. Woods

Authors
  1. Thomas S. Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woods, T.S. On The Alleged Incompatibility of Analysis and Application: A Response To Pierce and Epling. BEHAV ANALYST 3, 67–69 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391846

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391846

Search

Navigation