Abstract
According to Division 30 of the American Psychological Association, “hypnosis” typically involves an introduction to the procedure during which a subject, client, or research participant is told that suggestions for imaginative experiences will be presented. The so-called “hypnotic induction” is an extended initial suggestion for using one’s imagination, and may contain further elaboration of the introduction. The subsequent “hypnotic procedure” is used to encourage and evaluate the subject’s responses to suggestions. When using hypnosis, one person (the subject) is guided by another (the hypnotist) to respond to suggestions involving changes in subjective experience, as well as alterations in perception, sensation, emotion, thought or behavior. In addition, persons can also learn self-hypnosis, which is the act of administering hypnotic procedures on one’s own. if the subject responds to hypnotic suggestions, it is generally inferred that hypnosis has been induced. Many practitioners, but not all practitioners, believe that hypnotic responses and experiences are characteristic of a so-called “hypnotic state.” While some practitioners think that it is not necessary to use the word “hypnosis” as part of the hypnotic induction, others view it as essential. In other words, there are agreements and disagreements concerning the definition and description of hypnosis even by researchers, theoreticians, and practitioners who have given considerable thought to this topic.
In addition, the details of hypnotic procedures and suggestions will differ depending on the goals of the practitioner and the purposes of the clinical or research endeavor. Procedures traditionally involve suggestions to relax, although relaxation is not necessary for hypnosis and a wide variety of suggestions can be used including those to become more alert. Suggestions that permit the extent of hypnosis to be assessed by comparing responses to standardized scales can be used in both clinical and research settings. While the majority of individuals are responsive to at least some suggestions, scores on standardized scales range from high to negligible. Traditionally, scores are grouped into low, medium, and high categories. As is the case with other positively scaled measures of psychological constructs such as attention and awareness, the salience of evidence for having achieved hypnosis increases with the individual’s score.
The term “hypnosis” was coined by James Braid (1795–1860), an English physician. Braid disliked the term “mesmerism,” which had been named after its originator, Franz Anton Mesmer (1734–1815), an Austrian physician. Braid concluded that Mesmer’s purported cures were not due to “animal magnetism” as Mesmer had insisted, but to suggestion. He developed the eye-fixation technique (also known as “Braidism”) of inducing relaxation and called the process “hypnosis” (after Hypnos, the Greek god of sleep) because he thought that hypnotic phenomena were a form of sleep. Later, realizing his error, he tried to change the name to “monoeidism” (meaning influence of a single idea) however, the orig inal name stuck. In other words, semantics played an important role in the history of hypnosis and actually directed the way that this modality was practiced.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Achterberg, J. (1985). Imagery in healing: Shamanism and modern medicine. Boston: Shambhala.
Agogino, G.A. (1965). The use of hypnotism as an ethnologic research technique. Plains Anthropologist, 10, 31–36.
Belo, J. (1960). Trance in Bali. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bourguignon, E., & Evascu, T. (1977). Altered states of consciousness within a general evolutionary perspective: A holocultural analysis. Behavior Science Research, 12, 199–216.
Bowers, M.K. (1961). Hypnotic aspects of Haitian voodoo. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 9, 269–282.
Campbell, J. (1990). Transformations of myth through time. New York: Harper & Row.
Cooperstein, M.A. (1992). The myths of healing: A summary of research into transpersonal healing experience. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 86, 99–133.
Erickson, M.H., Rossi, E.L., & Rossi, S.H. (1976). Hypnotic realities: The induction of clinical hypnosis and the indirect forms of suggestion. New York: Irvington.
Feinstein, D., & Krippner, S. (1997). The mythic path. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
Frank, J.D., & Frank, J.B. (1991). Persuasion and healing (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Furst, P.T. (1977). “High states” in culture-historical perspective. In N.E. Zinberg (Ed.), Alternate states of consciousness (pp. 53–88). New York: Free Press.
Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constuctionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
Greenfield, S.M. (1992). Hypnosis and trance induction in the surgeries of Brazilian spiritist healer-mediums. Anthropology of Consciousness, 2(3–4), 20–25.
Jilek, W.G. (1982). Indian healing: Shamanic ceremonialism in the Pacific Northwest today. Blaine, WA: Hancock House.
Kakar, S. (1982). Shamans, mystics and doctors: A psy-chological inquiry into India and its healing traditions. New York: A.A. Knopf.
Kalweit, H. (1988). Dreamtime and inner space: The world of the shaman. Boston: Shambhala.
Kirsch, I. (1990). Changing expectations: A key to effective psychotherapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Krippner, S. (1987). Dreams and shamanism. In S. Nicholson (Ed.), Shamanism: An expanded view of reality (pp. 125–132). Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing.
Krippner, S. (1989). A call to heal: Patterns of entry in Brazilian mediumship. In C. Ward (Ed.), Altered states of consciousness and mental health: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 186–206). Los Angeles: Sage.
Krippner, S. (1990). A questionnaire study of experiential reactions to a Brazilian healer. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 56, 208–215.
Krippner, S. (1993). Cross-cultural perspectives on hypnotic-like procedures used by native healing practitioners. In J.W. Rhue, S.J. Lynn, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (pp. 691–717). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Krippner, S. (1994). Cross-cultural treatment perspectives on dissociative disorders. In S.J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 338–361). New York: Guilford.
Krippner, S. (2000). Cross-cultural perspectives on transpersonal hypnosis. In E. Leskowitz (Ed.), Transpersonal hypnosis: Gateway to body, mind, and spirit (pp. 141–162). New York: CRC Press.
Krippner, S. (2002). Conflicting perspectives on shamans and shamanism: Points and counterpoints. American Psychologist, 57, 960–977.
Kroger, W.S. (1977). Clinical and experimental hypnosis (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Leacock, S., & Leacock, R. (1972). Spirits of the deep: Drums, mediums and trance in a Brazilian city. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Lynn, S.L., & Rhue, J. (1988). Fantasy proneness: Hypnosis, developmental antecedents, and psychopathology. American Psychologist, 43, 5–44.
Murphy, G. (1947). Personality: A biosocial approach to origins and structure. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Price-Williams, D. (1975). Explorations in crosscultural psychology. San Francisco: Chandler and Sharp.
Raboteau, A.J. (1986). The Afro-American traditions. In R.L. Numbers & D.W. Amundsen (Eds.), Caring and curing: Health and medicine in Western religious traditions (pp. 539–562). New York: Macmillan.
Richeport, M.M. (1992). The interface between multiple personality, spirit mediumship, and hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 34, 168–177.
Rogers, S.L. (1982). The shaman: His symbols and his healing power. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Sandner, D. (1979). Navaho symbols of healing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Spanos, N.P. (1989). Hypnosis, demonic possession, and multiple personality: Strategic enactments and disavowals of responsibility for actions. In C. Ward (Ed.), Altered states of consciousness and mental health: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 96–124). Los Angeles: Sage.
Strupp, H.H. (1972). On the technology of psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 270–278.
Suryani, L.K., & Jensen, G.D. (1993). Trance andpos- session in Bali: A window on Western multiple personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thong, D., with Carpenter, B., & Krippner, S. (1994). A psychiatrist in paradise: Treating mental illness in Bali. Bangkok, Thailand: White Lotus Press.
Topper, M.D. (1987). The traditional Navajo medicine man: Therapist, counselor, and community leader. Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology, 10, 217–249.
Torrey, E.F. (1986). Witchdoctors and psychiatrists: The common roots of psychotherapy and its future. New York: Harper & Row.
Vogel, V.J. (1990). American Indian medicine. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. (Original work published 1970)
Winkelman, M. (1984). A cross-cultural study of magico-religious practitioners. In R.-I. Heinze (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Shamanism (pp. 27–38). Berkeley: Independent Scholars of Asia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of this paper was supported by the Chair for the Study of Consciousness, Saybrook Graduate School. It was presented at the annual convention of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis, Anaheim, CA, 12–16 March 2004.
Alan Watts Professor of Psychology, Saybrook Graduate School, 450 Pacific Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94133.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Krippner, S. Indigenous Healing Practitioners and Their Use of Hypnotic-Like Procedures. Act Nerv Super 51, 51–63 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379923
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379923