Skip to main content
Log in

Dieser Roman ist nicht für dich, meine Tochter. In Ohnmacht! Schamlose Posse! Sie hielt, weiß ich, die Augen bloß zu. (1, 22)1

Zusammenfassung

Der Aufsatz versucht, die Dialektik, die den Worten “um der gebrechlichen Einrichtung der Welt willen” innewohnt, im Gebaren der Marquise und ihrer Eltern aufzuzeigen: jedes Bemühen, sich in ihrer bedrohten Welt einzurichten, ist letztlich gebrechlich, indem das Unbewußte durchwegs die moralisch-existentielle Sicherheit in Frage stellt.

Abstract

This study seeks to relate the inherent tension in the phrase “um der gebrechlichen Einrichtung der Welt willen” to the behaviour of the Marquise and her parents. Their attempts at making a habitable order (“Einrichtung”) of their experiences are at every turn inadequate (“gebrechlich”): unacknowledged motivation undermines the claim to moral and existential certainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. See Hans Peter Herrmann, “Zufall und Ich, Zum Begriff der Situation in den Novellen Heinrich von Kleists,” GRM, NF XI (1961), 86ff. Similar tendencies are to be found in Günther Blöcker, Heinrich von Kleist oder das absolute Ich (1960), pp. 176f and Josef Kunz, Die deutsche Novelle zwischen Klassik und Romantik (1966), p. 138, p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walter Müller-Seidel, “Die Struktur des Widerspruchs in Kleists Marquise von O…, DVjs, 28 (1954), 503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid. pp. 510f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorrit Cohn, “Kleist’s Marquise von O…: The Problem of Knowledge,” Monatshefte, 67 (1975), 133.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Herrmann, op. cit., p. 78, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Milfull is one of the very few critics to probe the reconciliation, but I feel that his reading does not do full justice to the complexity of this scene: “Nowhere could it be clearer that the ‘mistress’ really belongs to the father, and that she can only be transferred to the erring son after an act of complete submission.” (“Oedipus and Adam — Greek Tragedy and Christian Comedy in Kleist’s Der zerbrochne Krug,” GLL, 27 [1973], 815).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I cannot agree with the simplistic view of Donald H. Crosby, who says of the mother in this scene: “She obviously approves of what she sees, and we may imagine that Kleist did, too.” (“Psychological Realism in the Works of Kleist: Penthesilea and Die Marquise von O…,” Literature and Psychology, 19 [1969], 13).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn, op. cit., p. 132, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Günther Blöcker, who calls the placing of the advertisement a “hausbacken-vernünftigste” course of action and, in discussing this scene, speaks of the “wunderbare Sicherheit des Seins” (op. cit., p. 138, p. 176). See also Herrmann, op. cit., pp. 77f.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohn, op. cit., pp. 137f. See also Kunz, op. cit., p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swales, E. The Beleaguered Citadel: A Study of Kleist’s Die Marquise von O…. Dtsch Vierteljahrsschr Literaturwiss Geistesgesch 51, 129–147 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376298

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376298

Navigation