Abstract
The application of rigid polymeric foam for large investment casting patterns with complex geometries can improve the dimensional tolerances and the surface quality of the casting. However, these pattern materials have a tendency to promote crack formation in investment casting shells during pattern removal by firing. Experimental methods were combined with finite element modeling to predict stress in the shell. The model takes into consideration the thermal and mechanical properties of the pattern and the shell materials to determine the heat transfer and thermal expansion stresses developed in the shell during firing. The thermal and mechanical properties of the pattern and shell were obtained from experimental tests. A 3D nonlinear finite element model was developed to predict possible crack formation in the shells during pattern removal. The effects of the thermo-mechanical properties of the foam and the shell, as well as the firing process parameters were modeled, and extreme cases were experimentally validated. Recommendations for firing process parameters and pattern design to decrease stress and eliminate crack formation in the shell were formulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Foster, G. “Flashfire Dewax for Today’s Investment Casting Foundry,” Investment Casting Institute 42nd Annual Meeting, pp. 2:1-2:11, Atlanta, Georgia; USA; 25–28 (Sept 1994).
Yao, W.L. and Leu, M.C., “Analysis of Shell Cracking in Investment Casting with Laser Stereolithography Patterns,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 5, no. 1 (March 1999).
Capadona, J.A., “Slurry Process Control in Production can Crack Down on Shell Cracking,” Incast, vol. 4, no. 4 pp. 10–12 (April 1991).
Cannell, N. and Sabau, A.S., “Predicting Pattern Tooling and Casting Dimensions for Investment Casting, Phase II,” Final Technical Report (September 2005).
Kline, D., Lekakh, S., Mahimkar, C. and Richards, V., “Crack Formation in Ceramic Shell during Foam Pattern Firing,” Technical and Operating Conference, Chicago, Illinois; USA (December 2009).
ASTM D1621, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics,” ASTM International (2010).
ASTM C1161, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature,” ASTM International (2002).
ASTM C20, “Standard Test Methods for Apparent Porosity, Water Absorption, Apparent Specific Gravity, and Bulk Density of Burned Refractory Brick and Shapes by Boiling Water,” ASTM International (2000).
ABAQUS Version 6.9. Manual, Dassault Systèmes (2009).
DeBorst, R., “Smeared Cracking, Plasticity, Creep, and Thermal Loading-A Unified Approach,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 62, pp. 89–110 (1987).
Cervera, M. and Chiumenti, M., “Smeared Crack Approach: Back to the Original Track,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech, vol. 30, pp. 1173–1199 (2006).
Mahimkar, C., Richards, V.L. and Lekakh, S.N., “High Temperature Thermo-Physical Properties of Ceramic Shell,” Investment Casting Institute 57th Annual Conference and Expo, (October 10–13, 2010).
Niknejad, A., Liaghat, G.H., Moslemi, N.H. and Behravesh, A.H., “Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Instantaneous Folding Force of the Polyurethane Foam-Filled Square Honeycombs,” Materials and Design, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 69–75 (January 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Everhart, W., Lekakh, S., Richards, V. et al. Crack Formation During Foam Pattern Firing in the Investment Casting Process. Inter Metalcast 7, 7–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355549
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355549