Abstract
Although an increasing number of studies of technological, institutional and organizational change refer to the concepts of path dependence and path creation, few attempts have been made to consider these concepts explicitly in their methodological accounts. This paper addresses this gap and contributes to the literature by developing a comprehensive methodology that originates from the concepts of path dependence and path creation — path constitution analysis (PCA) — and allows for the integration of multi-actor constellations on multiple levels of analysis within a process perspective. Based upon a longitudinal case study in the field of semiconductors, we illustrate PCA ‘in action’ as a template for other researchers and critically examine its adequacy. We conclude with implications for further path-oriented inquiries.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, Andrew (1992): What Do Cases Do?, in: Charles C. Ragin and Howard S. Becker (eds.): What is a Case?, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 53–82.
Abbott, Andrew (1997): On the Concept of Turning Point, Comparative Social Research, 16: 85–106.
Aguinis, Herman, Charles A. Pierce, Frank A. Bosco, and Ivan S. Muslin (2009): First Decade of Organizational Research Methods: Trends in Design, Measurement, and Data-Analysis Topics, Organizational Research Methods, 12 (1): 69–112.
Ansari, Shahzad and Raghu Garud (2009): Inter-Generational Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: The Case of Mobile Communications, Research Policy, 38 (2): 382–392.
Antonelli, Cristiano (1997): The Economics of Path-Dependence in Industrial Organization, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15 (6): 643–675.
Archer, Margaret S. (1995): Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Arthur, W. Brian (1989): Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events, The Economic Journal, 99 (394): 116–131.
Arthur, W. Brian (1994): Increasing Returns and Path Dependency in the Economy, University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI.
Barnes, William, Myles Gartland, and Martin Stack (2004): Old Habits Die Hard: Path Dependency and Behavioral Lock-In, Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (2): 371–377.
Baum, Joel A. C. and Brian S. Silverman (2001): Complexity, Attractors, and Path Dependence and Creation in Technological Evolution, in: Raghu Garud and Peter Karnøe (eds.): Path Dependence and Creation, Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ et al., 169–209.
Bennett, Andrew and Colin Elman (2006): Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence, Political Analysis, 14 (3): 250–267.
Beyer, Jürgen (2010): The Same or Not the Same: On the Variety of Mechanisms of Path Dependence, International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5 (1): 1–11.
Bitektine, Alex (2008): Prospective Case Study Design: Qualitative Method for Deductive Theory Testing, Organizational Research Methods, 11 (1): 160–180.
Browning, Larry D. and Judy C. Shetler (2000): Sematech: Saving the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, Texas A&M University Press: College Station, TX.
Carayannis, Elias G. and Jeffrey M. Alexander (2004): Strategy, Structure and Performance Issues of Precompetitive R&D Consortia: Insights and Lessons Learned From SEMATECH, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51 (2): 226–232.
Cohen, Ira J. (1989): Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life, St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY.
Collier, Ruth B. and David Collier (1991): Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Creswell, John W. and Vicki L. Plano Clark (2007): Designing and Conducting: Mixed Methods Research, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA et al.
Cusumano, Michael A., Yiorgos Mylonadis, and Richard S. Rosenbloom (1992): Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS Over Beta, Business History Review, 66 (Special Issue 1): 51–94.
David, Paul A. (1985): Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, 75 (2): 332–337.
David, Paul A. (2001): Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics”, in: Pierre Garrouste and Stavros Ioannides (eds.): Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Idea: Past and Present, Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 15–41.
David, Paul A. (2007): Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science, Cliometrica, 1 (2): 91–114.
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell (1983): The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.
Dobusch, Leonhard and Jakob Kapeller (2013): Striking New Paths: Theory and Method in Path Dependence Research, Schmalenbach Business Review, 65 (in print).
Dosi, Giovanni (1982): Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories, Research Policy, 11 (3): 147–162.
Dosi, Giovanni and Luigi Orsenigo (1988): Coordination and Transformation: An Overview of Structures, Behaviours and Change in Evolutionary Environments, in: Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter: New York, NY, 13–37.
Edmondson, Amy C. and Stacy E. McManus (2007): Methodological Fit in Management Field Research, Academy of Management Review, 32 (4): 1155–1179.
Garud, Raghu and Peter Karnøe (2001): Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation, in: Raghu Garud and Peter Karnøe (eds.): Path Dependence and Creation, Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ et al., 1–38.
Garud, Raghu and Peter Karnøe (2003): Bricolage Versus Break through: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32 (2): 277–300.
Garud, Raghu, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Peter Karnøe (2010): Path Dependence or Path Creation?, Journal of Management Studies, 47 (4): 760–774.
Gephart, Robert P. (2004): Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4): 454–462.
Gibbert, Michael, Winfried Ruigrok, and Barbara Wicki (2008): What Passes as a Rigorous Case Study?, Strategic Management Journal, 29 (13): 1465–1474.
Giddens, Anthony (1984): The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press: Cambridge.
Giddens, Anthony (1989): A Reply to My Critics, in: David Held and John B. Thompson (eds): Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 249–301.
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss (1967): The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine: Chicago, IL.
Goulding, Christina (2005): Grounded Theory, Ethnography and Phenomenology, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (3/4): 294–308.
Granovetter, Mark (1985): Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481–510.
Gwyn, Chuck and Stefan Wurm (2009): EUV LLC: A Historical Perspective, in: Vivek Bakshi (ed.): EUV Lithography, SPIE Press: Bellingham, WA, 55–101.
Hess, Sebastian, Daniela Kleinschmitt, Ludwig Theuvsen, Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel, and Ulrike Zschache (2010): Explaining Path Dependence Through Discourse Analysis: The Case of the Seasonal Farm Workers in Germany, in: Georg Schreyögg and Jörg Sydow (eds.): The Hidden Dynamics of Path Dependence, Palgrave-Macmillan: Basingstoke et al., 197–216.
Huber, George P. and Daniel J. Power (1985): Retrospective Reports of Strategic-Level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing Their Accuracy, Strategic Management Journal, 6 (2): 171–180.
Jansen, Karen J. (2004): From Persistence to Pursuit: A Longitudinal Examination of Momentum During the Early Stages of Strategic Change, Organization Science, 15 (3): 276–294.
Jarzabkowski, Paula (2008): Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process, Academy of Management Journal, 51 (4): 621–656.
Jepperson, Ronald and John W. Meyer (2011): Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms, Sociological Theory, 29 (1): 54–73.
Jick, Todd D. (1979): Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4): 602–611.
Ketchen, David J., Brian K. Boyd, and Donald D. Bergh (2008): Research Methodology in Strategic Management: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges, Organizational Research Methods, 11 (4): 643–658.
Koch, Jochen (2011): Inscribed Strategies: Exploring the Organizational Nature of Strategic Lock-In, Organization Studies, 32 (3): 337–363.
Koch, Jochen, Martin Eisend, and Arne Petermann (2009): Path Dependence in Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Impact of Complexity Under Increasing Returns, Business Research, 2 (1): 67–84.
Krippendorff, Klaus (2004): Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA et al.
Langley, Ann (1999): Strategies for Theorizing From Process Data, Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 691–710.
Langlois, Richard N. and W. Edward Steinmueller (1999): The Evolution of Competitive Advantage in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1947–1966, in: David C. Mowery and Richard R. Nelson (eds.): Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 19–78.
Leblebici, Huseyin, Gerald R. Salancik, Anne Copay, and Tom King (1991): Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (3): 333–363.
Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba (1985): Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage: Beverly Hills, CA et al.
Linden, Greg, David C. Mowery, and Rosemarie H. Ziedonis (2000): National Technology Policy in Global Markets: Developing Next-Generation Lithography in the Semiconductor Industry, Business and Politics, 2 (2): 93–113.
Mahoney, James (2001): The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America, Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.
Market Watch (2011): KLA-Tencor and SEMATECH Partner to Advance EUV Lithography Technology at UAlbany NanoCollege, http://www.marketwatch.com/story/kla-tencortm-and-sematech-partner-to-advance-euv-lithography-technology-at-ualbanynanocollege-2011-06-21 (Access date: 2011-08-24).
Markoff, John (2000): Global Effort to Make Machines that Make Chips, New York Times, 2000-12-12.
Martin, Xavier, Robert M. Salomon, and Zheying Wu (2010): The Institutional Determinants of Agglomeration: A Study in the Global Semiconductor Industry, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (6): 1769–1800.
Mayntz, Renate (2004): Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34 (2): 237–259.
McGrath, Dylan and Mark LaPedus (2011): Analysis: Litho World Needs a Shrink, http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4213996/Analysis—Litho-world-needs-a-shrink (Access date: 2011-03-16).
Meyer, Uli and Cornelius Schubert (2007): Integrating Path Dependency and Path Creation in a General Understanding of Path Constitution: The Role of Agency and Institutions in the Stabilisation of Technological Innovations, Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 3 (1): 23–44.
Moore, Gordon E. (1965): Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits, Electronics, 38 (8): 114–117.
Müller-Seitz, Gordon and Jörg Sydow (2011): Terminating Institutionalized Termination: Why SEMATECH Became More Than a Temporary System, in: Gino Cattani, Simone Ferriani, Lars Frederiksen, and Florian Täube (eds.): Advances in Strategic Management: Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management, Emerald: Bingley, 147–186.
North, Douglas C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Okada, Yoshitaka (2008): From Vertical to Horizontal Inter-Firm Cooperation: Dynamic Innovation in Japan’s Semiconductor Industry, Asia Pacific Business Review, 14 (3): 379–400.
Page, Scott (2006): Path Dependence, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1 (1): 87–115.
Petermann, Arne (2010): Pfadabhängigkeit und Hierarchie: Zur Durchsetzungskraft von selbstverstärkenden Effekten in hierarchischen Organisationen, http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000019882 (Access date:2012-04-14).
Piekkari, Rebecca, Catherine Welch, and Eriikka Paavilainen (2009): The Case Study as Disciplinary Convention: Evidence From International Business Journals, Organizational Research Methods, 12 (3): 567–589.
Pierson, Paul (2000): Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics, American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251–267.
Pierson, Paul (2004): Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Pratt, Michael G. (2008): Fitting Oval Pegs Into Round Holes. Tensions in Evaluating and Publishing Qualitative Research in Top-Tier North American Journals, Organizational Research Methods, 11 (3): 481–509.
Ragin, Charles C. (2006): Case-Oriented Comparative Methods, in: David de Vaus (ed.): Research Design: Vol. IV, Sage: London, 21–41.
Rosen, Michael (1991): Coming to Terms With the Field: Understanding and Doing Organizational Ethnography, Journal of Management Studies, 28 (1): 1–24.
Schubert, Cornelius and Arnold Windeler (2007): Pfadkreationsnetzwerke aus methodischer Sicht, in: Hagen Hof and Ulrich Wengenroth (eds.): Innovationsforschung: Ansätze, Methoden, Grenzen und Perspektiven, Lit-Verlag: Hamburg et al., 117–126.
Seale, Clive (1999): The Quality of Qualitative Research, Sage: London.
SEMATECH (2010): Conferences and Events, http://www.sematech.org/meetings/events.htm (Access date: 2010-01-16).
Street, Christopher T. and R. Brent Gallupe (2009): A Proposal for Operationalizing the Pace and Scope of Organizational Change in Management Studies, Organizational Research Methods, 12 (4): 720–737.
Suddaby, Roy (2006): From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not, Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4): 633–642.
Sydow, Jörg and Arnold Windeler (1998): Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness, Organization Science, 9 (3): 265–284.
Sydow, Jörg, Frank Lerch, and Udo Staber (2010): Planning for Path Dependence? The Case of a Network in the Berlin-Brandenburg Optics Cluster, Economic Geography, 86 (2): 173–195.
Sydow, Jörg, Georg Schreyögg, and Jochen Koch (2009): Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box, Academy of Management Review, 34 (4): 689–709.
Sydow, Jörg, Arnold Windeler, Cornelius Schubert and Guido Möllering (2012): Organizing R&D Consortia for Path Creation and Extension: The Case of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies, Organization Studies, 33 (7): 907–936.
Tashakkori, Abbas and Charles Teddlie (eds.) (2003): Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA et al.
Valorinta, Mikko, Henri Schildt, and Juha-Antti Lamberg (2011): Path Dependence of Power Relations, Path-breaking Change and Technological Adaptation, Industry and Innovation, 18 (8): 765–790.
Vergne, Jean-Philippe and Rodolphe Durand (2010): The Missing Link Between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications, Journal of Management Studies, 47 (4): 736–759.
Windeler, Arnold (2003): Kreation technologischer Pfade: ein strukturationstheoretischer Analyseansatz, in: Georg Schreyögg and Jörg Sydow (eds.): Strategische Prozesse und Pfade, Gabler: Wiesbaden, 295–328.
Windeler, Arnold and Jörg Sydow (2001): Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices: Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry, Organization Studies, 22 (6): 1035–1060.
Yin, Robert K. (1981): The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1): 58–65.
Yin, Robert K. (2009): Case Study Research, 4th ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA et al.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sydow, J., Windeler, A., Müller-Seitz, G. et al. Path Constitution Analysis: A Methodology for Understanding Path Dependence and Path Creation. Bus Res 5, 155–176 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342736
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342736