Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for non-participation in follow-up research on eating disorders

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Lack of participation in follow-ups is thought to be a serious bias in outcome research on eating disorders; however, little systematic knowledge exists about the problem. The present study aimed to delineate non-participation in long-term follow-up research, and explore the reasons for non-participation. Method: Eating disorder patients (N=840) entering a naturalistic, longitudinal multi-centre study were divided into participators (N=508) and non-participators (N=332) in 36-month follow-ups. Non-participators were further classified as either active (i.e. refused participation or failed to attend scheduled appointments) or passive non-participators (i.e. could not be traced). Results: Active nonparticipators exhibited significantly lower levels of general and eating disorder psychopathology at intake compared to participators, while passive non-participators reported higher levels of hostility. Discussion: Systematic exploration of non-participation in longitudinal research can help to mitigate the problem of indistinct results due to missing data. Barriers to successful longitudinal research and how to overcome non-participation at endpoint are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lyons J.S., et al.: The Measurement and Management of Clinical Outcomes in Mental Health. New York, Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ross S., et al.: Factors that limit the number, progress and quality of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review. In: Stevens A., et al., (Eds.), The advanced handbook of methods in evidence-based healthcare, 2001, London. SAGE. Publications Ltd., p. 38–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Quadflieg N., Fichter M.M.: The course and outcome of bulimia nervosa. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 12, 99–109, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clausen L.: Review of studies evaluating psychotherapy in bulimia nervosa: the influence of research methods. Scand. J. Psychol., 45, 247–252, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pike K.M.: Long-term course of anorexia nervosa: response, relapse, remission, and recovery. Clin. Psychol. Rev., 18, 447–475, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinhausen H.C.: The outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. Am. J. Psychiatry, 159, 1284–1293, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fichter M.M., Quadlfieg N.: Prediction of Long-term Course and Outcome of Binge-eating Disorder (BED). Presented at the 9th General Meeting of the European Council on Eating Disorders, Austria, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka H., Kiriike N., Nagata T., Riku K.: Outcome of severe anorexia nervosa patients receiving inpatient treatment in Japan: an 8-year follow-up study. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 55, 389–396, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blouin J., Scharre K., Carter J., Blouin A., Tener L., Zuro C., Barlow J.: Factors affecting dropout rate from cognitive-behavioral group treatment for bulimia nervosa. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 17, 323–329, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Theander S.: Långtidsförloppet vid anorexia nervosa. Svensk psykiatri, 11, 13–25, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clinton D.N.: Why Do Eating Disorder Patients Drop Out? Psychother. Psychosom., 65, 29–35, 1996.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahon J.: Dropping out from psychological treatment for eating disorders: What are the issues? Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev., 8, 198–216, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steel Z., Jones J., Adcock S., Clancy R., Bridgford- West L., Austin J.: Why the high rate of dropout from individualized cognitive-behaviour therapy for bulimia nervosa? Int. J. Eat. Disord., 28, 209–214, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Waller G.: Drop-out and failure to engage in individual outpatient cognitive behaviour therapy for bulimic disorders. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 22, 35–41, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vandereycken W., Pierloot R.: Drop-out during inpatient treatment of anorexia nervosa: A clinical study of 133 patients. Br. J. Med. Psychol., 56, 145–156, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen S.: Epidemiology and mortality of eating disorders. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am., 24, 201–214, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkwood B.R., Sterne J.A.C.: Essential Medical Statistics. 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Altman D.G.: Practical statistics for medical research. Statistics texts. London, Chapman and Hall, xii, 611, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steinhausen H.C., Seidel R., Winkler Metzke C.: Evaluation of treatment and intermediate and longterm outcome of adolescent eating disorders. Psychol. Med., 30, 1089–1098, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. 4th ed. 1994. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clinton D., Norring C.: The Rating of Anorexia and Bulimia (RAB) Interview: Development and preliminary validation. Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev., 7, 362–363, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nevonen L., Broberg A.G., Clinton D., Norring C.: A measure for the assessment of eating disorders: reliability and validity studies of the Rating of Anorexia and Bulimia interview — revised version (RAB-R). Scand. J. Psychol., 44, 303–310, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garner D.M.: Eating Disorder Inventory-2. Professional Manual. Odessa, Fl, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Derogatis L.R., Lipman R.S., Covi L.: SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale — preliminary report. Psychopharmacol. Bull., 9, 13–28, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Björk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Björk, T., Clinton, D. & Norring, C. Reasons for non-participation in follow-up research on eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord 11, 147–153 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327560

Key words

Navigation