Skip to main content
Log in

Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone

  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present paper endeavors to develop predictive artificial neural network model for forecasting the mean monthly total ozone concentration over Arosa, Switzerland. Single hidden layer neural network models with variable number of nodes have been developed and their performances have been evaluated using the method of least squares and error estimation. Their performances have been compared with multiple linear regression model. Ultimately, single-hidden-layer model with 8 hidden nodes have been identified as the best predictive model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balaguer Ballester, E., Valls, G., Carrasco-Rodriguez, J., Soria Oliva, E., Valle-Tascon, S., (2002). Effective 1-day ahead prediction of hourly surface ozone concentrations in eastern Spain using linear models and neural networks. Ecologic. Model., 156, 27–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corani, G., (2005). Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning, Ecologic. Model., 185, 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M.W., Dorling, S.R., (1998). Artificial Neural Network (Multilayer Perceptron)-a review of applications in atmospheric sciences. Atmos. Environ., 32, 2627–2636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, W.W., Tang, T., (1998). Applying Neural Network Models to prediction and data analysis in meteorology and oceanography. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79, 1855–1869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartalopoulos, S.V., (2000). Understanding Neural Networks and Fuzzy logic-basic concepts and applications, Prentice Hall, New-Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarthi, S.V., Pittner, S., (1999). Accelerating neural network training using weight extrapolation. Neur. Net., 12, 1285–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood, I., Muhammad, R.K., Abraham, A., (2002). Neurocomputing based Canadian weather analysis. computational intelligence and applications. Dynamic Publishers Inc., USA, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milionis, A.E., Davis, T.D., (1994). Regression and stochastic models for air pollution, Part I: review comments and suggestions. Atmos. Environ., 28(17), 2801–2810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnari, G., Nucifora, M., Randieri, C., (1998). The application of neural techniques to the modelling of time-series of atmospheric pollution data. Ecologic. Model., 111, 187–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prybutok, R., Junsub, Y., Mitchell, D., (2000). Comparison of neural network models with ARIMA and regression models for prediction of Houston’s daily maximum ozone concentrations. Euro. J. Operat. Res., 122, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J.P., Harrison, R.M., (1997). Regression modeling of hourly NOx and NO2 concentration in urban air in London. Atmos. Environ., 31(24), 4081–4094.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viotti, P., Liuti, G., Di Genova, P., (2002). Atmospheric urban pollution: application of an artifical neural network to the city of Perugia. Ecologic. Model., 148, 27–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., (1995). Statistical methods in atmospheric sciences, Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Chattopadhyay B.Sc..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bandyopadhyay, G., Chattopadhyay, S. Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 141–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325972

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325972

Keywords

Navigation