Abstract
Present paper endeavors to develop predictive artificial neural network model for forecasting the mean monthly total ozone concentration over Arosa, Switzerland. Single hidden layer neural network models with variable number of nodes have been developed and their performances have been evaluated using the method of least squares and error estimation. Their performances have been compared with multiple linear regression model. Ultimately, single-hidden-layer model with 8 hidden nodes have been identified as the best predictive model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balaguer Ballester, E., Valls, G., Carrasco-Rodriguez, J., Soria Oliva, E., Valle-Tascon, S., (2002). Effective 1-day ahead prediction of hourly surface ozone concentrations in eastern Spain using linear models and neural networks. Ecologic. Model., 156, 27–41.
Corani, G., (2005). Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning, Ecologic. Model., 185, 513–529.
Gardner, M.W., Dorling, S.R., (1998). Artificial Neural Network (Multilayer Perceptron)-a review of applications in atmospheric sciences. Atmos. Environ., 32, 2627–2636.
Hsieh, W.W., Tang, T., (1998). Applying Neural Network Models to prediction and data analysis in meteorology and oceanography. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79, 1855–1869.
Kartalopoulos, S.V., (2000). Understanding Neural Networks and Fuzzy logic-basic concepts and applications, Prentice Hall, New-Delhi
Kamarthi, S.V., Pittner, S., (1999). Accelerating neural network training using weight extrapolation. Neur. Net., 12, 1285–1299.
Maqsood, I., Muhammad, R.K., Abraham, A., (2002). Neurocomputing based Canadian weather analysis. computational intelligence and applications. Dynamic Publishers Inc., USA, 39–44.
Milionis, A.E., Davis, T.D., (1994). Regression and stochastic models for air pollution, Part I: review comments and suggestions. Atmos. Environ., 28(17), 2801–2810.
Nunnari, G., Nucifora, M., Randieri, C., (1998). The application of neural techniques to the modelling of time-series of atmospheric pollution data. Ecologic. Model., 111, 187–205.
Prybutok, R., Junsub, Y., Mitchell, D., (2000). Comparison of neural network models with ARIMA and regression models for prediction of Houston’s daily maximum ozone concentrations. Euro. J. Operat. Res., 122, 31–40.
Shi, J.P., Harrison, R.M., (1997). Regression modeling of hourly NOx and NO2 concentration in urban air in London. Atmos. Environ., 31(24), 4081–4094.
Viotti, P., Liuti, G., Di Genova, P., (2002). Atmospheric urban pollution: application of an artifical neural network to the city of Perugia. Ecologic. Model., 148, 27–46.
Wilks, D. S., (1995). Statistical methods in atmospheric sciences, Academic Press, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bandyopadhyay, G., Chattopadhyay, S. Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 141–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325972
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325972