Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable transport indicators: Definition and integration

  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a different interpretation of sustainable transportation, is introduced, in which sustainability with respect to transportation sector for the selected countries is evaluated. This interpretation characterizes “sustainable development” through “harmonic development”. It means sustainable development with special focus on transportation can be measured by the degree of conformity between environment, economy, and social aspects on one hand, and transportation on the other hand. The best indicator to perform such a measurement is elasticity. The database used for the study encompasses a series of national indicators for each country Seventy nine countries were initially selected for detailed analysis for the period of 1980–1995. The data have been extracted from centralized information sources of international agencies. The key dimensions of sustainable development i.e. social, environmental, and economic characteristics are used. Firstly, a set of sustainable transportation indicators is introduced. These indicators, which in fact are elasticities, show the relative change of non-transportation variables with respect to transportation ones. Second composite indices of three non-transportation groups with respect to four transportation modes are calculated. The composite indices are then aggregated by the Concordance Analysis Technique to achieve comprehensive transportation sustainability indices of countries, and according to these values, the countries are compared, ranked, and classified. Mathematical and statistical analyses of the database support the study quantitatively. The results for the selected indicators and countries show that from sustainable transportation point of view and based on the above-mentioned interpretation of sustainable development, United States is in the ranked first, and Sierra Leon is last among the subset of 79 countries with non-missing data. The results of the study depict an overall scheme for comparative assessment of transportation sustainability of the countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barter, P. A., An International Comparative Perspective on Urban Transport and Urban Form in Pacific Asia: The Challenge of Rapid Motorization in Dense Cities. Ph. D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Pert, Australia, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Sustainability of the Association of Engineers and Geoscientists of BC (CSAEG). Sustainability site, What is sustainability? http://www.sustainability.ca. Accessed, 2003

  • Giuliano, G. A., Multicriteria method for transportation investment planning, Transportation Research: Part A, 19A, 29–41,1985

  • Gudmundsson, H. and M. Hojer, Sustainable development principles and their implications for transport. Ecological Economics, 19, 269–282, 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Road Transport Union, World Transport Statistics. IRU, Geneva, 1996

  • Jalal, K. F. and Rogers, P. P., Measuring environmental performance in Asia, Ecological Indicators, 2, 39–59, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt, I., Hanley, N. and Wilson. M. D., Measuring and Modeling Sustainable Development. Parthenon Publishing Group, London, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Towards sustainable transportation. OECD Proceedings of the Vancouver Conference, OECD, 1996

  • Pezzey, J., Sustainable development concepts: an economic analysis, World Bank Environment paper, 2, 1992

  • United Nations (UN), Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992

  • United Nations, Reports on the Aggregation of Sustainable Development, 9th Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development Background Paper. Division for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, 2000

  • United Nations, Statistical Yearbook, 45th Edition. United Nations, New York, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaziri, M. and Rassafi, A. A. An Appraisal of Road Transport Sustainable Development in the Asian and Pacific Region. In Technical Papers, International Seminar on Sustainable Development on Road Transport, New Delhi, India, pp III39-III46, 2001

  • Vaziri, M., and Rassafi, A. A., An appraisal of forest sustainability in the Asian and Pacific region. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Ecosystems and Sustainable Development, ECOSUD Alicante, Spain: 615–621, 2001

  • Vaziri, M., and Rassafi, A. A., Globalization and Sustainable Development: European Experience. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Global Business and Economic Development, Bangkok, Thailand,:36-42, 2003

  • World Bank, The World Development Indicators 2002.

  • World Bank, Washington D.C., 2002

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Rassafi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rassafi, A.A., Vaziri, M. Sustainable transport indicators: Definition and integration. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2, 83–96 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325861

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325861

Key words

Navigation