Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence and impact of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis on health-related quality of life among active subjects

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: To assess the prevalence and impact of osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among active subjects employed in the public workforce in Belgium. Methods: A cohort of 3440 subjects employed by the Liège City Council was prospectively followed for 6 months. The employees were asked to fill in a monthly log in a health record book, of data regarding their healthcare consumption due to OA and OP. HRQOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). Results: 1811 subjects (52.6%) filled in at least one questionnaire. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.46 months. The self-reported prevalence of OA and OP at entry to the study were respectively 34.1% and 5.3%. 3.6% of subjects reported suffering from both OA and OP. Subjects with OA and both OA and OP had significantly lower scores on all SF-36 dimensions compared with normal subjects, reflecting a worse HRQOL. The OP group had significantly lower mean scores for physical functioning and pain compared with controls. Subjects with both OA and OP had significantly lower values for physical functioning, physical role and pain when compared with the OA and OP groups. Conclusions: The results of this survey of a large sample of active subjects show that self-reported osteoarthritis and osteoporosis are common in the workplace. Both diseases have a major impact on health-related quality of life compared with that of people without self-reported musculoskeletal diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Badley EM. The effect of osteoarthritis on disability and health care use in Canada. J Rheumatol 1995; 43 (Suppl): 19–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reginster JY. The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002; 41 (Supp1): 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease. A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge (MA): Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and The World Bank 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carr AJ. Beyond disability: measuring the social and personal consequences of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 230–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Campion ME, O’Fallon WM. Indirect and nonmedical costs among people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with nonarthritic controls. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 43–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 646–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riggs BL, Melton LJ. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforted by epidemiology. Bone 1995; 17(5 Suppl): 505S–11S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin AR, Sornay-Rendu E, Chandler JM, Duboeuf F, Girman CJ, Delmas PD. The impact of osteoporosis on quality of life: the OFELY cohort. Bone 2002; 31: 32–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992: 30: 473–83.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey. In Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996: 337–45.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McHoney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36- item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ravazi D, Gandek B. Testing Dutch and French translations of the SF-36 Health Survey among Belgian angina patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 975–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leplege A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1013–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUAL-EFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999: 10: 150–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B, et al. Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 456–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7: 478–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1193–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 778–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillipov G, Phillips PJ, Leach G, Taylor AW. Public perceptions and self-reported prevalence of osteoporosis in South Australia. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 552–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heliövaara M, Aromaa A, Klaukka T, Knekt P, Joukamaa M, Impivaara O. Reliability and validity of interview data on chronic diseases. The Mini-Finland Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 181–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Briggs A, Scott E, Steele K. Impact of osteoarthritis and analgesic treatment on quality of life of an elderly population. Ann Pharmacotherapy 1999; 33: 1154–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. de Bock GH, Kaptein AA, Touw-Otten F, Mulder JD. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis in a family practice setting. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Pickard L, et al. The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 895–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Picavet HS, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 723–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Rabenda Msc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabenda, V., Manette, C., Lemmens, R. et al. Prevalence and impact of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis on health-related quality of life among active subjects. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 55–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325211

Keywords

Navigation