Skip to main content
Log in

Dual-task interference during obstacle clearance in healthy and balance-impaired older adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: To investigate dual-task interference between a concurrent cognitive task (auditory Stroop test) and obstacle avoidance in older adults with or without a history of falls. Methods: Gait performance (temporal-distance parameters, range of motion and peak velocity of the center of mass) and verbal reaction time (VRT) in the secondary auditory Stroop task were monitored in 12 healthy young adults, 12 healthy older adults and 12 balance impaired older adults (BIOA) while they sat or walked with and without an obstacle in their path. VRT was used as an indicator of attention given to the secondary Stroop task. Results: Under dual-task situations, all older participants reduced their gait velocity, taking longer strides and wider steps. BIOA significantly increased toe clearance of their trailing limb during obstacle avoidance. In all participants, cognitive attention to the Stroop task, as measured by VRT, was diminished as the level of difficulty in the activity increased; however, the effect was blunted in BIOA compared to healthy subjects. Conclusions: Performing two tasks was highly inefficient among BIOA, as their performance in the gait and secondary task were both modified under dual-task situations. It is possible that dual-task interference in BIOA may be due to the inability to shift attention between the two tasks without primarily prioritizing gait. The findings suggest that BIOA should perform one task at a time in daily activities in order to reduce the risk of falling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brauer S, Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A. The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on the compensatory stepping response to a stance perturbation in balance-impaired older adults. Gait Posture 2002; 15: 83–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brauer S, Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A. The interacting effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in balance-impaired elderly. J Gerontol 2001; 56: 489–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabell A, Simons MA, Nayak USL. Falls in the healthy elderly: predisposing causes. Ergonomics 1985; 28: 965–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Hudes ES. Risk factors for injurious falls: A perspective study. J Gerontol 1991; 46: 164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol 2000; 55: 10–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connell BR, Wolf SL. Environmental and behavioral circumstances associated with falls at home among healthy elderly individuals. Atlanta FICSIT Group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 179–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Verghese J, Buschke H, Viola L, et al. Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1572–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 1993; 97: 139–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindenberger U, Marsiske M, Baltes P. Memorizing while walking: increase in dual task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychol Aging 2000; 15: 417–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Stops walking when talking as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 1997; 349: 617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Gonthier R, Kressig RW. Dual-task-related gait changes in transitionally frail older adults: the type of the walking-associated cognitive task matters. Gerontology 2005; 51: 48–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen HC, Aston-Miller JA, Alexander NB, Schultz AB. Effects of age and available response time on ability to step over an obstacle. J Gerontol 1994; 49: 227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen HC, Schultz AB, Ashton-Miller JA, Giordani B, Alexander NB, Guire KE. Stepping over obstacles: Dividing attention impairs performance of old more than young adults. J Gerontol 1996; 51: 116–22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schrodt LA, Mercer VS, Giuliani CA, Hartman M. Characteristics of stepping over an obstacle in community dwelling older adults under dual-task conditions. Gait Posture 2004; 19: 279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Overstall PA, Exton-Smith AN, Imms FJ, Johnson AL. Falls in the elderly related to postural imbalance. BMJ 1977; 1: 261–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams TJ, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83: S7–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn ME, Chou L-S. Age-related reduction in sagittal plane center of mass motion during obstacle crossing. J Biomech 2004; 37: 837–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Woltring HJ. A Fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Software 1986; 8: 104–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, et al. The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol 1997; 52: 232–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Hahn ME, Brey RH. Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. Gait Posture 2003; 18: 125–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim SY, Kim MS, Chun MM. Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. PNAS 2005; 102: 16524–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown LA, McKenzie NC, Doan JB. Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation. J Gerontol Med Sci 2005; 60A: 924–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Means KM. The obstacle course: a tool for the assessment of functional balance and mobility in the elderly. J Rehabil Res Dev 1996; 33: 413–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Trueblood PR, Yeung K, Harker JO, Robbins AS. The reliability and validity of an obstacle course as a measure of gait and balance in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 1997; 9: 127–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lamoureux E, Sparrow WA, Murphy A, Newton RU. The effects of improved strength on obstacle negotiation in community-living older adults. Gait Posture 2003; 17: 273–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patla AE. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait Posture 1997; 5: 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patla AE, Rietdyk S. Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Gait Posture 1993; 1: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Silsupadol P, Siu KC, Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Training of balance under single- and dual-task conditions in older adults with balance impairment. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 269–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ka-Chun Siu PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siu, KC., Lugade, V., Chou, LS. et al. Dual-task interference during obstacle clearance in healthy and balance-impaired older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 20, 349–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324867

Key words

Navigation