Skip to main content
Log in

Do older patients who refuse to participate in a self-management intervention in the Netherlands differ from older patients who agree to participate?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Refusal of patients to participate in intervention programs is an important problem in clinical trials but, in general, researchers devote relatively little attention to it. In this article, a comparison is made between patients who, after having been invited, agreed to participate in a self-management intervention (participants) and those who refused (refusers). Compared with other studies of refusers, relatively more information could be gathered with regard to both their characteristics and reasons for refusing, because all potential participants were invited personally. Methods: Older patients from a Dutch outpatient clinic were invited to participate in a self-management intervention, and their characteristics were assessed. Demographic data were collected, as well as data on physical functioning and lack of emotional support. People who refused to participate were asked to give their reasons for refusing. Results: Of the 361 patients invited, 267 (74%) refused participation. These refusers were more restricted in their mobility, lived further away from the location of the intervention, and had a partner more often than did the participants. No differences were found in level of education, age or gender. The main reasons given by respondents for refusing to participate were lack of time, travel distance, and transport problems. Conclusions: As in many studies, the refusal rate in this study is high, and seems to be related to physical mobility restrictions, travel distance and, partly, to availability of emotional support. These findings may be used to make the recruitment process more effective — for example, by offering transport to the location of the intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris R, Dyson E. Recruitment of frail older people to research: lessons learnt through experience. J Adv Nurs 2001; 36: 643–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ory MG, Gerety MB. Recruitment of older participants in frailty/injury prevention studies. Prev Sci 2002; 3: 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schuurmans H. Promoting well-being in frail elderly people. Dissertation, University of Groningen, Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns 2001; 44: 119–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodge JA, Schork MA. Nonparticipation of older adults in a heart disease self-management project. Res Aging 1993; 15: 220–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Durham ML, Beresford S, Diehr D, Grembowski D, Hecht JA, Patrick DL. Participation of higher users in a randomized trial of medicare reimbursement for preventive services. Gerontologist 1991; 31: 603–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner EH, LaCroix AZ. Factors associated with participation in a senior health promotion program. Gerontologist 1991; 31: 598–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson LA, Fogler J, Dedrick RF. Recruiting from the community: lessons learned from the Diabetes Care for Older Adults Project. Gerontologist 1995; 35: 395–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter WB, Larson E. Participation of older adults in health programs and research: a critical review of the literature. Gerontologist 1991; 31: 584–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang B, Hendricks AM, Slawsky MT, Locastra JS. Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004; 4: 8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchner DM, Pearson DC. Factors associated with participation in a community senior health promotion program: a pilot study. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 775–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morey MC, Cowper PA, Feussner JR, et al. Evaluation of a supervised exercise program in a geriatric population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37: 348–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Heuvelen MJG, Hochstenbach JBM, Brouwer WH, et al. Differences between participants and non-participants in an RCT on physical activity and psychological interventions for older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res 2005; 17: 236–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Frieswijk N, Slaets JPJ. Old or frail: what tells us more? J Gerontol 2004; 59A: 962–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorig K, Gonzalez VM, Laurent D. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Workshop Leader’s Manual. Stanford, CA: Stanford Patient Education Center, Stanford University: 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek). Gezondheidstoestand van de Nederlandse bevolking (State of health of the Dutch population). 2004.

  17. Steverink N, Slaets JPJ, Schuurmans H, Van Lis M. Measuring frailty: developing and testing the GFI (Groningen Frailty Indicator). Gerontologist 2001; 41: 236–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Jong Gierveld J. van Tilburg T. A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness. Res Aging 2006; 28: 582–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. SPSS. (12.0.1). 2004. Chicago, SPSS Inc.

  20. Jacomb PA, Jorm AF, Korten AE, Christensen H, Henderson AS. Predictors of refusal to participate: a longitudinal health survey of the elderly in Australia. BMC Public Health 2002; 2: 4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM. Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings. A review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23: 62–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrike Elzen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elzen, H., Slaets, J.P.J., Snijders, T.A.B. et al. Do older patients who refuse to participate in a self-management intervention in the Netherlands differ from older patients who agree to participate?. Aging Clin Exp Res 20, 266–271 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324777

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324777

Keywords

Navigation