Skip to main content
Log in

Aging and time-to-postural stability following a visual perturbation

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Postural stability is essential to the performance of most daily activities and is necessary to lead an independent lifestyle. Most functional assessments of balance have only evaluated spatial properties of posture, however, assessments should also evaluate balance in the temporal domain. Both domains provide crucial information to an individual’s postural stability. The following study examines time to regain stability and the magnitude of postural motion following a virtual perturbation. Methods: To examine the temporal limitations imposed by age (n=45),3 adult age groups were tested, young (18–19 yr), young old (60–69 yr), and old adults (70–79 yr). Participants were placed into a virtual room appearing as if the visual surround moved in a discrete antero-posterior motion. A force platform was used to assess postural motion across 4 visual perturbation conditions, 9 and 18 cm and 0.3 and 0.6 Hz. Results: Young adults exhibited significantly less postural motion than both of the older age groups and required the least amount of time to regain postural stability following the discrete visual perturbation, while the old adults required the greatest amount of time. Conclusions: These findings indicate that even small visual perturbations induce strong temporal limitations which are magnified by advancing age. Furthermore, the postural saturation (reduction in postural motion) that is typically found in young adults with increasing movement magnitude was not found in either of the older adult groups. Older adults are at a higher risk of losing balance during this period of time to reacquire postural stability which appears to be unaffected by elevated visual motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slobounov SM, Moss SA, Slobounova ES, Newell KM. Aging and time to instability in posture. J Gerontol 1998; 53A: B71–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Wegen EEH, Van Emmerik REA, Riccio GE. Postural orientation: Age-related changes in variability and time-to-boundary. Hum Mov Sci 2002; 21: 61–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson C, Mihalko S, Newell K. Aging and the time needed to reacquire postural stability. J Aging Phys Act 2003; 11: 419–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Riccio GE. Information in movement variability. About the qualitative dynamics of posture and orientation. In Newell KM, Corcos DM, Eds. Variability and motor control. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee DN, Aronson E. Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Percept Psychophysiol 1974; 15: 529–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoffregen TA. Row structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985; 11: 554–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stelmach G, Teasdale N, DiFabio RP. Age related decline in postural control mechanisms. Int J Aging and Hum Dev 1989; 29: 205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wade MG, Lindquist R, Taylor JR, Treat-Jacobson D. Optical flow, spatial orientation, and the control of posture in the elderly. J Gerontol 1995; 50B: P51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee DN, Lishman JR. Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Mov Stud 1975; 1: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuno S, Kawakita T, Kawakami O, Miyake Y, Watanabe S. Postural adjustment response to depth direction moving patterns produced by virtual reality graphics. Jpn J Physiol 1999; 49: 417–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prioli AC, Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA. Postural control in active and sedentary elderlies. Gerontology 2005; 51: 145–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tossavainen T, Juhola M, Aalto H, et al. Postural control as assessed with virtual reality. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 545: 53–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tossavainen T, Juhola I, Pyykkö I, Aalto E, Toppila G. Virtual reality stimuli for force platform posturography. In Surján G, Engelbrect R, McNair P, eds. Proceedings of MIE 2002. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2002: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tossavainen T, Juhola R, Pyykkö I, Aalto H, Toppila E. Development of virtual reality stimuli for force platform posturography. Int J Med Inform 2003; 70: 277–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Loughlin JL, Robitaille Y, Boivin JF, Suissa S. Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 342–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mergner T, Schweigart G, Maurer C, Blümle A. Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions. Exp Brain Res 2005; 167: 535–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spirduso WW, Francis DL, MacRae PG. Physical dimensions of aging, 2nd ed. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 2005: 131–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenhall U, Rubin W. Degenerative changes in the human vestibular sensory epithelia. Acta Otolaryngol 1975; 79: 67–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Asten WN, Gielen CC, Denier van der Gon JJ. Postural movements induced by rotations of visual scenes. J Opt Soc Am 1988; 5: 1781–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterka RJ, Benolken MS. Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway. Exp Brain Res 1995; 105: 101–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oie KS, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ. Human multisensory fusion of vision and touch: detecting non-linearity with small changes in the sensory environment. Neurosci Lett 2001; 315: 113–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB. Visual perception and cognition. In Evans JG, Williams TF, ed. Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992: 575–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela S. Haibach PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haibach, P.S., Slobounov, S.M., Slobounova, E.S. et al. Aging and time-to-postural stability following a visual perturbation. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 438–443 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324728

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324728

Keywords

Navigation