Abstract
Background and aims: The increase in the proportion of elderly people and a consequent increase in the demand for care have caused healthcare systems to become overloaded. This paper describes the use of Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs), derived from the Minimum Data Set for Home Care, for monitoring quality of care. Research questions were, “Do HCQI scores vary between home care organizations in different countries?” and “Are one or more country-specific sites consistently scoring better on most or all HCQIs”? Methods: a cross-sectional observational study of 65+ randomly selected clients of home care organizations in urban areas in 11 European countries who had been receiving home care for at least two weeks. Data were collected with the MDS-HC. The scoring of 16 prevalent quality indicators for home care, adjusted for population differences, was calculated with baseline data. Results: Population size at baseline was 4,007 clients. Among home care clients in Europe, “rehabilitation potential in Activities of Daily Living and no therapies” (average 75.9%) and “inadequate pain control” were the most common quality problems. The prevalence between populations studied in various countries varied substantially. No country-specific site consistently scored worst or best. Conclusions: HCQIs derived from the MDS-HC detect variance in quality scores between home care in the 11 partner countries. The highest prevalence of unwanted outcomes were most often found in the Czech Republic, Italy and Germany. Although further research is necessary, we believe that HCQIs may be of great value for quality improvement in home care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hirdes JP, Fries BE, Morris JN, et al. Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) based on the MDS-HC. Gerontologist 2004; 44: 665–79.
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academies Press. 2001 (http://www.iom.edu/CMS/8089.aspx)
Hirdes JP, Zimmerman D, Kimberly D, Hallman G, Soucie PS. Use of the MDS Quality Indicators to assess quality of care in institutional settings. Can J Qual Health Care 1998; 14: 5–11.
Morris JN, Fries BE, Steel K, et al. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community settings: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 1017–24.
Landi F, Tua E, Onder G, et al. Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community. Med Care 2000; 38: 1184–90.
Karon SL, Zimmerman DR. Using indicators to structure quality improvement initiatives in long-term care. Qual Man Health Care 1996; 4: 54–66.
Fries BE, Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD, Mor V, Park PS. Effect of the national Resident Instrument on selected health conditions and problems. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 994–1001.
Phillips CD, Zimmerman D, Bernabei R, Jónsson PV. Using the Resident Assessment Instrument for quality enhancement in nursing homes. Age Ageing 1997; 26 (Suppl): 77–81.
Popejoy LL, Rantz MJ, Conn V, Wipke-Tevis D, Grando VT, Porter R. Improving quality of care in nursing facilities. Gerontological clinical nurse specialist as research nurse consultant. J Gerontol Nurs 2000; 26: 6–13.
Carpenter GI, Gambassi G, Topinkova E, et al. Community care in Europe. The Aged in Home Care project (ADHOC). Aging Clin Exp Res 2004; 16: 259–69.
Zimmerman DR, Karon SL, Arling G, et al. Development and testing of nursing home quality indicators. Health Care Financ Rev 1995; 16: 104–27.
WHO. World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bos, J.T., Frijters, D.H.M., Wagner, C. et al. Variations in quality of Home Care between sites across Europe, as measured by Home Care Quality Indicators. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 323–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324709
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324709