Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence and distribution of hip and knee joint replacements and hip implants in older Americans by the end of life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Hip and knee replacements have become increasingly common in the older population but the prevalence of these procedures and the potential impact on functioning towards the end of life have not been previously described. The aim of this study was to estimate the rates and distribution of hip and knee joint replacements and hip implants (surgical pins, screws, rods, plates, etc.) in people aged 65 and over who died in the US in 1993, and to measure mobility outcomes during their last year of life. Methods: Data were drawn from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey; 7684 deaths in people aged 65 years or over were included. From these data full informant interviews were available for 6586 (86%). Three hundred and forty-four decedents had hip joint replacements, 357 had hip implants, and 102 had knee joint replacements. Replicate methods were used to obtain weighted estimates for all decedents in the 1993 US base population. Results: Of female and male decedents, 15.5% (95% CI: 14.3–16.7) and 6.1% (95% CI: 3.9–8.2), respectively, had received the studied devices. About 80% of these had been implanted more than a year before death. There were large differences in the risks of receiving a hip joint replacement or a hip implant depending on gender, education and race. About 60% of recipients either had no difficulty in getting around their own homes during the last year of life or had difficulty lasting less than 6 months. Conclusions: Implanted hip and knee devices were common in older people who died in the US in 1993. Large sociodemographic differences in those who received vs those who did not were present at the end of life. While difficulty in walking is the main indication for joint replacements, a majority of those receiving replacements experienced less than 6 months of mobility difficulties in their own homes during the last year of their lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz BP, Freund DA, Heck DA, et al. Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis. Health Serv Res 1996; 31: 125–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterson MG, Hollenberg JP, Szatrowski TP, Johanson NA, Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 1530–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moss A, Hamburger S, Moore R, Jeng L, Howie L. Use of selected medical device implants in the United States, 1988. NCHS Advance Data, 1991.

  4. Sharkness CM, Hamburger S, Moore RMJ, Kaczmarek RG. Prevalence of artificial hip implants and use of health services by recipients. Public Health Rep 1993; 108: 70–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guralnik JM, LaCroix AZ, Branch LG, Kasl SV, Wallace RB. Morbidity and disability in older persons in the years prior to death. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 443–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Center for Health Statistics. The National Mortality Followback Survey (provisional data), 1993. Public Use Data File Documentation. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998.

  7. Westat: WesVar Complex Samples. Version 3.0: User’s Guide. Washington, DC: Westat, 1998.

  8. Dorevitch MI, Cossar RM, Bailey FJ, et al. The accuracy of self and informant ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 791–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubenstein LZ, Schairer C, Wieland GD, Kane R. Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: effects of different data sources. J Gerontol 1984; 39: 686–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baron JA, Barrett J, Katz JN, Liang MH. Total hip arthroplasty: use and select complications in the US Medicare population. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 70–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Escarce JJ, Epstein KR, Colby DC, Schwartz JS. Racial differences in the elderly’s use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 948–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson MG, May DS, Kelly JJ. Racial differences in the use of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis among older Americans. Ethn Dis 1994; 4: 57–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JP, Kington R. Demographic and economic correlates of health in old age. Demography 1997; 34: 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limbs among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 612–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baron JA, Barrett J, Malenka D, et al. Racial differences in fracture risk. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 42–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA. Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 677–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stroup NE, Freni-Titulaer LW, Schwartz JJ. Unexpected geographic variation in rates of hospitalization for patients who have fracture of the hip. Medicare enrollees in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990; 72: 1294–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritter MA, Albohm MJ, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 737–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–83.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brander VA, Malhotra S, Jet J, Heinemann AW, Stulberg SD. Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older. Clin Orthop 1997; Dec.: 67–78.

  21. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998; Nov.: 93–110.

  22. Heck DA. Melfi CA. Mamlin LA. et al. Revision rates after knee replacement in the United States. Med Care 1998; 36: 661–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Manton KG, Corder L, Stallard E. Chronic disability trends in elderly United States populations: 1982–1994. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2593–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Freedman VA, Martin LG. Understanding trends in functional limitations among older Americans. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1457–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Crimmins EM, Saito Y, Reynolds SL. Further evidence on recent trends in the prevalence and incidence of disability among older Americans from two sources: the LSOA and the NHIS. J Gerontol 1997; 52: S59–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Melzer M.B., B.Ch., F.F.P.H.M..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melzer, D., Guralnik, J.M. & Brock, D. Prevalence and distribution of hip and knee joint replacements and hip implants in older Americans by the end of life. Aging Clin Exp Res 15, 60–66 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324481

Key Words

Navigation