Skip to main content
Log in

The quest for integrated systems of care for frail older persons

  • Thematic Section
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The challenge of an increasing elderly population, particularly with respect to frail older persons in need of long-term care, has coupled with ever-present budget constraints to make the financing, organization and delivery of elder care a major priority in North America, Europe and elsewhere in the developed world. Despite obvious cross-national differences in health and social care arrangements for the frail elderly, evidence of poorly coordinated services, disjointed care, less than optimum outcomes, system inefficiency, inadequate accountability, and uncontrolled costs can be found in all countries. There is a growing belief that more comprehensive approaches are needed to effectively address these problems. One such strategy, so-called integrated systems of care, shows great promise. The author critically examines the concept of integrated systems of care for the frail elderly, including the theoretical benefits and drawbacks of the model. At the policy and practice levels, descriptions are presented of, and evidence and lessons are summarized from a representative sample of such projects in the US (Social HMO and PACE), Canada (SIPA), Italy (Rovereto) and Australia (Coordinated Care Trials). The introduction of prototypes such as these raises a number of significant issues for policymakers, payers, providers, consumers and researchers. These are briefly examined in concluding remarks on the important potential of integrated systems of care for vulnerable older people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kodner D, Kay Kyriacou C. Fully integrated care for frail elderly: Two American models. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2000; November 1 (1). Available at: http://www.ijic.org

  2. Bergman H, Béland F, Gold S. The frail elderly population and the challenge of integration. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2002 (In press).

  3. Kodner DL, Sherlock M, Shankman J. Bringing managed care home: A new service strategy for people with chronic illnesses and disabilities. In Heumann LF, McCall M, Boldy DP, Eds. Empowering frail older people: Opportunities and impediments in housing, health and support service delivery. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy B, Mur-Veeman I, Steenbergen M, Wistow G. Inter-agency services in England and the Netherlands: A comparative study of integrated care development and delivery. Health Policy 1999; 48: 87–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: Logic, meaning and implications. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online]. In press 2002.

  6. Leutz WN. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. Milbank Q 1999; 77: 77–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergman H, Béland F, Lebel P, et al. Care for Canada’s frail elderly population: fragmentation or integration? CMAJ 1997; 157: 1116–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodner DL. Transforming care for the elderly through organizational innovation. In Dubé L, Zimmermann B, Bergman H, Eds. Transforming health in an era of chronic disease and aging clientele. Proceedings of Health Challenge 2001. Montreal, Canada: McGill University Faculty of Management & Faculty of Medicine. In press 2002.

  9. Challis D. Achieving co-ordinated and integrated care among long-term care services: The role of care management. Manchester, UK: Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Manchester, 2001.

  10. Goodwin N. Creating an integrated public sector? Labour’s plans for the modernization of the English health care system. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2002; March (2). Available at: http//www.ijic.org

  11. Stone R, Katz R. Thoughts on the future of integrating acute and long-term care. In Newcomer R, Wilkinson A, Lawton A, Eds. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr: Vol 16. New York: Hayworth Press. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brodsky J, Habib J, Mizrahi I. Long-term care laws in five developed countries: A review. Geneva. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2000. Publication No.WHO/NMH/CCL/00.2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kodner D, Kay Kyriacou C. Bringing managed care home to people with chronic, disabling conditions: Prospects and challenges for policy, practice and research. New York: Home Care Research Initiative (HCRI), Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York. In press 2002.

  14. Stevenson DG, Murtaugh CM, Feldman PH, Oberlink M. Expanding publicly financed managed long-term care programs to provide greater access to home and community-based care. Policy brief. New York: Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Fall/Winter 2000.

  15. National Chronic Care Consortium (NCCC). Integrating care for people with chronic conditions. Care Link. Bloomington. MN: NCCC, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kane RA, Kane RL, Ladd RC. Managed care and long-term care. In Kane RA, Kane RL, Ladd RC, Eds. The heart of long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Polivka L, Robinson-Anderson R. Managed care for the elderly and the role of the aging network. Long-Term Care Policy Series. Tampa, FL: Florida Policy Exchange Center on Aging, University of South Florida, June 1999.

  18. Newcomer R, Preston S, Harrington C. Health plan satisfaction and risk of disenrollment among Social HMO and fee-for-service recipients. Inquiry 1996; 33: 144–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Social Health Maintenance Organization Consortium. Social HMO status report. Waltham, MA: Social Health Maintenance Organization Consortium. Institute for Health Policy. Brandeis University, 1999.

  20. Newcomer R. Harrington C. Manton KG. Lynch MA. Letter to the editor. Gerontologist 1995; 35: 292–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Manton KG, Newcomer R, Lowrimore GR. Social Health Maintenance Organization and fee-for-service outcomes over time. Health Care Financ Rev 1993; 32: 277–97.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boose L. A study of the differences between Social HMO and other Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Kaiser Permanente under capitation contracts regarding intermediate care facility user rates and expenditures. Report. Portland, OR: Portland State University, 1993.

  23. Newcomer R, Manton K, Harrington C, Yordi C, Vertrees J. Case mix controlled service use and expenditures in the Social/Health Maintenance Organization demonstration. J Gerontol 1995; 50A: M35–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dowd B, Hillson S, von Sternberg T, Fischer LR. S/HMO versus TEFRA HMO enrollees: Analysis of expenditures. Health Care Financ Rev 1999; 20: 7–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. National PACE Association. PACE profile 2001. Available at: http://www.npaonline.org/

  26. Eng C, Pedulla J, Eleazer P, McCann R, Fox N. Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): An innovative model of integrated geriatric care and financing. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 223–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bodenheimer T. Long-term care for frail elderly people. The On Lok Model. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1324–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kane RL, Illston LH, Miller NA. Qualitative analysis of the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). Gerontologist 1992; 32: 771–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Branch LG. Coulam RF. Zimmerman YA. The PACE evaluation. Initial findings. Gerontologist 1995; 35: 349–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmerman Y, Pemberton D, Thomas L. Evaluation of the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). Factors contributing to care management and decision making in the PACE model. Baltimore. MD: Health Care Financing Administration. 1998 (Contract No. 500-96-0003/TO4).

  31. Chatterji P, Burstein NR, Kidder D, White AJ. Evaluation of the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly. The impact of PACE on participant outcomes. Baltimore. MD: Health Care Financing Administration, 1998 (Contract No. 500-96-0003/TO4).

  32. White AJ. Evaluation of the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). The effect of PACE on costs to Medicare: A comparison of Medicare capitation to projected costs in the absence of PACE. Baltimore. MD: Health Care Financing Administration. 1998 (Contract No. 500-96-0003/TO4).

  33. South Carolina State Health and Human Services Finance Commission. Palmetto Senior Care client satisfaction survey. Columbia, SC: South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 1994.

  34. Pryor D. Independent Living for Seniors: A 3-year assessment of perceptions and impact of the program. Rochester, NY: Center for Governmental Research. 1994.

  35. Hébert R. Les reseaux intégrés de services aux personnes âgées: Une solution prometteuse aux problèmes de continuité des services [Integrated service networks for elderly persons: A promising solution to the problem of continuity of services]. Le Médicin du Québec 2001; 36: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  36. The McGill University/Université de Montréal Research Group on Integrated Services for the Frail Elderly. Evaluation of phase 1, June 1999–May 2000. Montreal, Canada: Research Groupé May 2001 (Health Canada-Health Transition Fund Project No. NA404).

  37. Bernabei R, Landi F, Gambassi G, et al. Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. BMJ 1998; 316: 1348–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Landi F, Gambassi G, Pola R, et al. Impact of integrated home care services on hospital use. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 1430–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. The Australian Coordinated Care Trials. Background and trial descriptions. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 1999.

  40. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. The Australian Coordinated Care Trials. Reflections and lessons. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care; June 5, 2001. Available at: www.health.gov.au:80/hsdd/primcare/acoorcar/pubs/reflections/preface.htm.au:80

  41. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. The Australian Coordinated Care Trials: Final national evaluation report on the first round of the trials. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care; June 26, 2001. Available at: www.health.gov.au:80/hsdd/primcare/acoor-car/pubs/acct/contents.htm.au:80

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis L. Kodner Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kodner, D.L. The quest for integrated systems of care for frail older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res 14, 307–313 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324455

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324455

Key Words

Navigation