Skip to main content
Log in

Paediatric minor oral surgical procedures under inhalation sedation and general anaesthetic: a comparison of variety and duration of treatment

  • Clinical Practice
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aim: To develop baseline data in relation to paediatric minor oral surgical procedures undertaken with both general anaesthesia and nitrous oxide inhalation sedation within a Hospital Dental Service. Study Design: Data were collected prospectively over a three-year period from May 2003 to June 2006 for patients attending the Departments of Paediatric Dentistry, Dundee Dental Hospital and Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Great Britain, for all surgical procedures undertaken with either inhalation sedation or general anaesthetic. Both operator status and the procedure being undertaken were noted. In addition, the operating time was recorded. Results: Data for 166 patients (F: 102; M: 64) with a median age of 12.50 (inter-quartile range 10.00, 14.20) years showed that 195 surgical procedures were undertaken. Of these 160 and 35 were with general anaesthetic and sedation respectively. The surgical removal of impacted, carious and supernumerary unit(s) accounted for 53.8% of all procedures, whilst the exposure of impacted teeth and soft tissue surgery represented 34.9% and 11.3% of procedures respectively. The median surgical time for techniques undertaken with sedation was 30.00 (inter-quartile range 25.00, 43.50) minutes whilst that for general anaesthetic was similar at 30.00 (inter-quartile range 15.25, 40.00) minutes (not statistically significant, (Mann Whitney U, W = 3081.5, P = 0.331). Conclusions: The majority of paediatric minor oral surgical procedures entail surgical exposure or removal of impacted teeth. The median treatment time for most procedures undertaken with either general anaesthetic or nitrous oxide sedation was 30 minutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Malik MI, Al-Sarheed MA. Comprehensive dental care of pediatric patients treated under general anesthesia in a hospital setting in Saudi Arabia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 79–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri A, Roberts G, Ashley P, Scheer B. Analysis of paediatric dental care provided under general anaesthesia and levels of dental disease in two hospitals. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 219–23; discussion 213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole BO, Hislop WS. A grading system in day surgery: effective utilization of theatre time. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998; 43: 87–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J. A prospective study of the use of nitrous oxide inhalation sedation for dental treatment in anxious children. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005; 6: 121–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Information and Statistics Division. Scottish Health Service Costs (Cost Books 2005). 2005.

  • Jamjoom MM, al-Malik MI, Holt RD, el-Nassry A. Dental treatment under general anaesthesia at a hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 110–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton H, Sandler PJ. The apically repositioned flap in tooth exposure. Dent Update 1999; 26: 236–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Zavala-Alonso V, Patino-Marin N, Friedman C. A new classification system for dental treatment under general anesthesia. Spec Care Dentist 2006; 26: 25–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milton TM, Murray PG, Irvine GH. Use of a removable healing plate in establishing successful exposure of palatally impacted canines. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41: 264–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHS Management Executive VFM Unit. The management and utilisation of operating departments. 1989.

  • Ogden GR, Kershaw AE, Hussein I. Use of theatre time for dentoalveolar operations under general anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38: 331–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson MH, Robinson SN, Reed R, Birnie DJ, Zaki GA. Management of palatally impacted canines: the findings of a collaborative study. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19:511–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw AJ, Meechan JG, Kilpatrick NM, Welbury RR. The use of inhalation sedation and local anaesthesia instead of general anaesthesia for extractions and minor oral surgery in children: a prospective study. Int J Paediatr Dent 1996; 6: 7–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soldani F, Eastaugh D, Stirrups D, Foley J. Use of a removable healing plate after exposure of an unerupted incisor with an apically repositioned flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005

  • The National Audit Office. Use of operating theatres in the National Health Service. 1987.

  • Wong FS, Fearne JM, Brook AH. Planning future general anaesthetic services in paediatric dentistry on the basis of evidence: an analysis of children treated in the Day Stay Centre at the Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, London, between 1985–95. Int Dent J 1997; 47: 285–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Foley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foley, J. Paediatric minor oral surgical procedures under inhalation sedation and general anaesthetic: a comparison of variety and duration of treatment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9, 46–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321596

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321596

Key Words

Navigation