Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of coronary flow reserve by intracoronary administration of nicorandil: comparison with intracoronary administration of papaverine

  • Original
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We investigated the usefulness of the intracoronary administration of nicorandil (NIC) compared with that of papaverine (PAP) in the evaluation of coronary flow reserve (CFR) in 17 patients, including 10 patients with old myocardial infarction and 7 patients with angina pectoris. CFR was measured with a Doppler guidewire inserted into the distal site of the left anterior descending coronary artery during intracoronary administration of 10 mg PAP, and of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0mg, and 3.0 mg NIC. We examined the changes in heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (mBP), the total score of QTc interval on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (∑ QTc), and ST-T segment, before and after drug administration. CFR was significantly lower during administration of 0.5 mg (1.9 ± 0.9) and 1.0 mg (2.2 ± 0.9) NIC than during administration of PAP (2.6 ± 1.1) (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the CFR during administration of 2.0 mg (2.6 ± 1.0) or 3.0mg (2.5 ± 1.0) NIC and that observed during administration of PAP. The CFR during administration of PAP was significantly correlated with that during administration of 2.0 mg NIC (r 2 = 0.72, P < 0.0001) and 3.0mg NIC (r 2 = 0.70, P < 0.0001). PAP, but not NIC, significantly altered the HR, mBP, and ∑ QTc. Inverted T waves were observed in 14 patients, and elevation of the ST segment was observed in 4 patients during administration of PAP (including 1 patient with ventricular tachycardia). The administration of 0.5 mg to 2.0 mg NIC was not associated with ST-T segment changes, except in 1 patient, but inverted T waves were observed in 2 patients and depression of the ST segment was observed in 2 patients during administration of 3.0mg NIC. Intracoronary administration of NIC is useful and safe for evaluating the CFR. The appropriate dose for measuring CFR is 2.0 mg nicorandil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ishihara M, Sato H, Takeishi H, Kawagoe T, Yoshimura M, Muraoka Y (1993) Impaired coronary flow reserve immediately after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 69:288–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein LW, Agarwal JB, Schneider RM, Hermann G, Weintraub WS, Helfant RH (1986) Effect of previous myocardial infarction on measurements of reactive hyperemia and coronary vascular reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:357–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. White CW (1993) Clinical applications of Doppler coronary flow measurements. Am J Cardiol 71:10D–16D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Offili EO, Labuvitz AJ, Kern MJ (1993) Coronary flow velocity dynamics in normal and diseased arteries. Am J Cardiol 71:3D–9D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson RT, White CW (1986) Intracoronary papaverine: an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the coronary circulation in conscious human. Circulation 73:444–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taira N (1989) Nicorandil as a hybrid between nitrates and potassium channel actors. Am J Cardiol 63:18J–24J

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vehate A, Matsuguchi T, Bitlel JA, Orar J, Meredith IT, Anderson TJ, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC (1993) Accuracy of electronic digital calipers compared with quantitative angiography in measuring coronary arterial diameter. Circulation 88:1724–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hongo M, Takenaka H, Uchikawa S, Nakatsuka T, Watanabe N, Sekiguchi M (1995) Coronary microvascular response to intracoronary administration of nicorandil. Am J Cardiol 75:246–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodgson J McB, Williams DU (1987) Superiority of intracoronary papaverine to radiographic contrast for measuring coronary flow reserve in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J 114:704–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, Flynn AE, Goto M, Nassi M, Segal J (1992) Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 85:1899–1911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Segal J, Kern MJ, Scott NA, King SB, Doucette JW, Haucert RR, Ofili E (1992) Alternation of phasic coronary artery flow velocity in man during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:276–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman JIE (1984) Maximal coronary flow and concept of coronary vascular reserve. Circulation 70:153–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganz W, Tamura K, Marcus HS, Donosa R, Yushida S, Swan HJC (1971) Measurement of coronary sinus blood flow by continuous thermodilation in man. Circulation 44:181–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nissen SE, Elion JL, Booth PC, Evans J, DeMaria AN (1986) Value and limitation of computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 86:562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schelbert HR, Winsenberg G, Phelpes ME (1982) Noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilation VI Detection of coronary artery disease in human beings with intravenous N-13 ammonia positron computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 49:1197–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross RS, Veda K, Lichtlen PR, Rees JR (1964) Measurement of myocardial blood flow in animals and man by selective injection of radioactive inert gas into the coronary arteries. Circ Res 28:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcus ML, Wright C, Doty D, Eastham C, Laughlin D, Krumm P, Fastenow C, Brody M (1981) Measurements of coronary velocity and reactive hyperemia in the coronary circulation of humans. Circ Res 49:877–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcus ML, Doty DB, Hiratzuka LF, Wright CB, Eastham CL (1982) A mechanism for angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 25:1326–1366

    Google Scholar 

  19. White CW (1993) Clinical application of Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements. Am J Cardiol 71:10D–16D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zijlsta F, Julliere Y, Serruys PW (1988) Value and limitation of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 15:76–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antony I, Nitenberg A, Foult JM, Aptecar E (1993) Coronary vasodilator reserve in untreated and treated hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:514–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ofili EO, Kern MJ, Lalovitz AJ, Vrian JA, Segal J, Aguirre F V, Castello R (1993) Analysis of coronary blood flow velocity dynamics in angiographically normal and stenosed arteries before and after endolumen enlargement by angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 21: 308–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossen JD, Winniford MD (1993) Effect of increase in heart arterial pressure on coronary flow reserve in human. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:343–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nahser PJ Jr, Brown RE, Oakarsson H, Winnifold MD, Rossen JD (1995) Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation 91:635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McGinn AL, White CW, Wilson RF (1990) Interstudy variability of coronary flow reserve. Infuence of heart rate, arterial pressure, and ventricular preload. Circulation 81:1319–1330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Edwards GM, Weston AH (1993) The pharmacology of ATP sensitive potassium channels. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 33:597–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Takayama T, Saito S, Hunye J, Ozawa Y, Kanmatsuse K, Fu T (1995) Safety and efficacy of intracoronary administration of nicorandil in human evaluated by intracoronary electrocardiogram, Doppler flow wire and coronary sinus O2 saturation. Ther Res 16:812–819

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iwasaki K, Sawanobori T, Tamura K (1991) The assessment of coronary flow reserve in canine. Intramyocardial and epicardial coronary arteries (in Japanese). Myaku-kangaku 31:1453–1461

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hashimoto K, Kinoshita M, Ohbayashi Y (1991) Coronary effects of nicorandil in comparison with nitroglycerin in chronic conscious dogs. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 5:131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, F., Hashimoto, T., Fujimoto, S. et al. Estimation of coronary flow reserve by intracoronary administration of nicorandil: comparison with intracoronary administration of papaverine. Heart and Vessels 13, 229–236 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03257245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03257245

Key words

Navigation