Skip to main content
Log in

Attracting manifolds for attitude estimation in flatland and otherlands

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-convex and non-affine parameterizations of uncertainty are intrinsic within every attitude estimation problem given the fact that minimal and/or nonsingular representations of the attitude matrix are invariably nonlinear functions of the unknown attitude variables. Of course, this fact remains true for rotation matrices both in the 2-D plane (flatland) and in higher dimensional spaces (otherlands). Therefore, estimation problems involving minimal nonsingular representations of unknown attitude matrices bring significant challenges to the adaptive estimation community. This paper develops a novel algorithm for attitude estimation. The proposed algorithm relies upon the design of an adaptive update law for the attitude estimate while preserving its inherent orthogonal structure. The underlying approach borrows from the classical Poisson differential equation in rigid-body rotational kinematics and endows certain manifold attractivity features within the adaptive estimation algorithm. Consequently, we are not only able to efficiently handle the non-affine and non-convex nature of the parameter uncertainty, but are also ensured of estimation algorithm stability and robustness under bounded measurement noise. In addition to a rigorous discussion on the overall methodology, the paper provides example simulations that help demonstrate the effectiveness of the attracting manifolds design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CAYLEY, A. “On the Motion of Rotation of a Solid Body,” Cambridge Mathematics Journal, Vol. 3, 1843, pp. 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SHUSTER, M.D. “A Survey of Attitude Representations,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1993, pp. 439–517.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. LI, Y., MURATA, M., and SUN, B. “New Approach to Attitude Determination Using Global Positioning System Carrier Phase Measurements,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 25, 2002, pp. 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SHUSTER, M.D. and OH, S.D. “Attitude Determination from Vector Observations,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1981, pp. 70–77.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. MARKLEY, F. L. “Attitude Determination from Vector Observations: A Fast Optimal Matrix Algorithm,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1993, pp. 261–280.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. WAHBA, G. “A Least-Squares Estimate of Satellite Attitude,” SIAM Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1965, p. 409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LERNER, G.M. “Three-Axis Attitude Determination,” Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control (Wertz, J. R., ed.), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1978, pp. 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SHUSTER, M.D. “Attitude Determination in Higher Dimensions,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1993, pp. 393–395.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. FARRELL, J. L. “Attitude Determination by Kalman Filter,” Automatica, Vol. 6, No. 5, 1970, pp. 419–430.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. CHU, D. and HARVIE, E. “Accuracy of the ERBS Definitive Attitude Determination System in the Presence of Propagation Noise,” Proceedings of the Flight Mechanics/Estimation Theory Symposium, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, 1990, pp. 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. BAR-ITZHACK, I.Y. and DEUTSCHMANN, J.K. “Extended Kalman Filter for Attitude Estimation of the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite,” Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, 1990, pp. 786–796.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CHALLA, M. S., NATANSON, G. A., BAKER, D. E., and DEUTSCHMANN, J.K. “Advantages of Estimating Rate Corrections During Dynamic Propagation of Spacecraft Rates-Applications to Real-Time Attitude Determination of SAMPEX,” Proceedings of the Flight Mechanics/Estimation Theory Symposium, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, 1994, pp. 481–495.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CHALLA, M. S. “Solar, Anomalous, and Magnetospheric Particle Explorer (SAMPEX) Real-Time Sequential Filter (RTSF),” technical report, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KINSEY, J. C. and WHITCOMB, L. L. “Adaptive Identification on the Group of Special Orthogonal Matrices,” technical report, The Johns Hopkins University, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. WERTZ, J. R. Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Springer, 1978, Chapters 6–7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. CRASSIDIS, J. L. “Angular Velocity Determination Directly from Star Tracker Measurements,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 25, 2002, pp. 1165–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SINGLA, P., CRASSIDIS, J. L., and JKINS, J. L. “Spacecraft Angular Rate Estimation Algorithms for a Star Tracker Mission,” presented as paper AAS 03-191 at the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Ponce, Puerto Rico, Feb. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. PSIAKI, M. L. “Global Magnetometer-Based Spacecraft Attitude and Rate Estimation,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 27, 2004, pp. 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. PSIAKI, M. L., KLATT, E. M., KINTNER, JR., P. M., and POWELL, S. P. “Attitude Estimation for a Flexible Spacecraft in an Unstable Spin,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 25, 2002, pp. 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SCHAUB, H., TSIOTRAS, P., and JUNKINS, J. L. “Principal Rotation Representations of Proper N×N Orthogonal Matrices,” International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 33, 1995, pp. 2277–2295.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. SASTRY, S. and BODSON, M. Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence, and Robustness, Prentice Hall, 1989, Chapter 3.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. SHUSTER, M.D. “Attitude Analysis in Flatland: The Plane Truth,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 52, Nos. 1&2, 2004, pp. 195–209.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. SCHAUB, H. and JUNKINS, J. L. Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems, AIAA Education Series, 2003, Chapter 3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maruthi R. Akella.

Additional information

Dedicated to Malcolm D. Shuster for his friendship and inspiring presence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akella, M.R., Seo, D. & Zanetti, R. Attracting manifolds for attitude estimation in flatland and otherlands. J of Astronaut Sci 54, 635–655 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256510

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256510

Keywords

Navigation