Skip to main content
Log in

Fundamental limits on spacecraft orbit uncertainty and distribution propagation

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present and review a number of fundamental constraints that exist on the propagation of orbit uncertainty and phase volume flows in astrodynamics. These constraints arise due to the Hamiltonian nature of spacecraft dynamics. First we review the role of integral invariants and their connection to orbit uncertainty, and show how they can be used to formally solve the diffusion-less Fokker-Plank equation for a spacecraft probability density function. Then, we apply Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem, a recent advance in symplectic topology, to find a previously unrecognized fundamental constraint that exists on general, nonlinear mappings of orbit distributions. Specifically, for a given orbit distribution, it can be shown that the projection of future orbit uncertainties in each coordinate-momentum pair describing the system must be greater than or equal to a fundamental limit, called the symplectic width. This implies that there is always a fundamental limit to which we can know a spacecraft’s future location in its coordinate and conjugate momentum space when mapped forward in time from an initial covariance distribution. This serves as an “uncertainty” principle for spacecraft uncertainty distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MONTENBRUCK, O. and GILL, E. Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods, Applications, Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CRASSIDIS, J. L. and JUNKINS, J. L. Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. RENAULT, C. and SCHEERES, D. J. “Optimal Placement of Statistical Maneuvers in an Unstable Orbital Environment,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2003, pp. 758–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SCHEERES, D. J., HAN, D., and HOU, Y. “The Influence of Unstable Manifolds on Orbit 1Uncertainty,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SCHEERES, D. J. “Navigation of Spacecraft in Unstable Orbital Environments,” Libration Point Orbits and Applications, G. Gomez, M.W. Lo, J.J. Masdemont, Eds., World Scientific, 2003, pp. 399–438.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. JUNKINS, J. L., AKELLA, M. F., and ALFRIEND, K. T. “Non-Gaussian Error Propagation in Orbit Mechanics,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol 44, No 4, 1996, pp 541–563.

    Google Scholar 

  7. SCHEERES, D. J. “Characterizing the Orbit Uncertainty Dynamics Along an Unstable Orbit,” presented as paper AAS 01–302 at the 2001 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Meeting, Quebec City, Canada, July 30–August 2, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. PARK, R. S. and SCHEERES, D. J. “Nonlinear Mapping of Gaussian Statistics: Theory and Applications to Spacecraft Trajectory Design,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, in press.

  9. MURRAY, C. D. and DERMOTT, S. F. Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. MCDUFF, D. and SALAMON, D. Introduction to Symplectic Topology, 2nd Ed., Oxford Science Publications, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. HSIAO, F.Y. and SCHEERES, D. J. “Fundamental Constraints on Uncertainty Evolution in Hamiltonian Systems,” presented as paper FrB04.5 at the 2006 American Control Conference, June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GREENWOOD, D. T. Classical Dynamics, Dover, 1997, pp. 182–183.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MARSDEN, J. E. and RATIU, T. S. Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd Ed., Springer, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. GUIBOUT, V. M. and SCHEERES, D. J. “Solving Relative Two-Point Boundary Value Problems: Application to Spacecraft Formation Flight Transfers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 4, July–August 2004, pp. 693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ARNOLD, V. I. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. MAYBECK, P. S. Stochastic Models, Estimation, and Control, Vol. 2, Academic Press, 1982, pp. 192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MILANI, A., GRONCHI, G. F., DE’ MICHIELI VITTURI, M., and KNEZEVIC, Z. “Orbit Determination with Very Short Arcs. I Admissible Regions,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 90, Nos. 1–2, 2004, pp. 57–85.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Scheeres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheeres, D.J., Hsiao, FY., Park, R.S. et al. Fundamental limits on spacecraft orbit uncertainty and distribution propagation. J of Astronaut Sci 54, 505–523 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256503

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256503

Keywords

Navigation