Skip to main content
Log in

Body-in-white material systems: A life-cycle cost comparison

  • Automotive Economic
  • Overview
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To be competitive in the global automobile industry, it is no longer enough to understand manufacturing cost alone. The growing emphasis on environmental impact has forced life-cycle cost issues to the forefront. This article defines the life cycle of automotive structures and exterior panels—the body-in-white—to include manufacturing, operation, and post-use. These body-in-white life-cycle costs are assessed for a midsize, four-door sedan using an implementation of a technique called technical cost modeling. This article describes the life-cycle cost-assessment methodology and applies it for alternative body-in-white structure and exterior panel materials. These include steel stampings; aluminum stampings, extrusions, and castings; and resin/glass composite and thermoplastic moldings. The life-cycle costs are presented and analyzed for varying manufacturing scenarios. Although life-cycle costs currently do not drive the decision-making process in the automotive industries, legislative and consumer pressures could one day give them added weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindsay Brooke, Gerry Kobe, and John McElroy, “The Case for Contour,” Automotive Industries (March 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeff R. Dieffenbach, “Technical Cost Modeling as a Cost Simulation Tool for Material and Process Selection” (Paper presented at the 1992 International Forum on Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Newport, RI, June 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al Fleming, “Aluminum Spaceframe Scores at SAE,” Automotive News (March 2, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denise McCluggage, “Consulier: Ugly, Endearing, and Fast,” Boston Globe (February 16, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christopher J. Morris, “Taurus ‘Tub’ All Composite Body Structure Demonstration Vehicle,” Structural Composites: Design and Processing Technologies (Materials Park, OH: ASM/ESD, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christopher A. Sawyer, “Carbon Fiber 101;” Automotive Industries (March 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christopher A. Sawyer, “The Aluminum Question,” Automotive Industries (February 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dieffenbach, J.R., Mascarin, A.E. Body-in-white material systems: A life-cycle cost comparison. JOM 45, 16–19 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03223304

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03223304

Keywords

Navigation