Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ways in which a multi-layered women’s calculus course influenced the participants’ learning of mathematics. This study, conducted in a state university in the Midwestern region of the United States, revealed not only that women in this particular section of calculus were likely to select careers that involved mathematics, but that the focus on peer support, psychosocial issues such as self-confidence, and pedagogy helped the young women overcome gender barriers, as well as barriers of class, poverty, and race. In this article we provide some of the relevant quantitative statistics and relate the stories of two particular women through excerpts from interviews, student artefacts, and participant observation data. We selected these young women because they faced multiple barriers to success in Calculus I and might not have completed the course or taken additional mathematics courses without the support structures that were fundamental to the course.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atweh, B., Bleicher, R. E., & Cooper, T. J. (1998). The construction of the social context of mathematics classrooms: A sociolinguistic analysis.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 63–82.
Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 327.
Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barnes, M. S. (1995). Development and evaluation of a gender-inclusive calculus course. In B. Grevholm & G. Hanna (Eds.),Gender and mathematics education: An ICME study (pp. 71–88). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Barnes, M. (2004).Student-student interaction during collaborative learning: How does gender influence participation? Paper presented at the 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Barnes, M., & Coupland, M. (1990). Humanizing calculus: Acase study in curriculum development. In L. Burton (Ed.),Gender and mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 72–80). New York: Cassell Education.
Beal, C. R. (1994).Boys and girls: The development of gender roles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Becker, J. R. (1996). Research on gender in mathematics: One feminist perspective.Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 18, 19–25.
Becker, J. R. (2003). Gender and mathematics: An issue for the twenty-first century.Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 470–473.
Belenky, M. R., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986).Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
Burton, L. (Ed.) (2003).Which way social justice in mathematics education? London: Praeger.
Chacon, P., & Soto-Johnson, H. (2003). Encouraging young women to stay in the mathematics pipeline: Mathematics camps for young women.School Science and Mathematics, 103, 274–284.
Collins, P. H. (1991).Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Davenport, L. A. (1994).Promoting interest in mathematical careers among girls and women. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environment.
Fennema, E., & Hart, L. E. (1994). Gender and the JRME.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 648–659.
Fennema, E., & Leder, G. C. (1990).Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
Forgasz, H. J. (1995). Girls’ attitudes in mixed and single-sex mathematics classrooms. In B. Grevholm & G. Hanna (Eds.),Gender and mathematics education: An ICME study (pp. 167–177). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Thomas, J. (2003). Mathematics participation, achievement, and attitudes: What’s new in Australia? In L. Burton (Ed.),Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 241–260). London: Praeger.
Goodell, J. E., & Parker, L. H. (2001). Creating a connected, equitable mathematics classroom: Facilitating gender equity. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.),Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 411–431). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hart, L. E. (1992). Two generations of feminist thinking.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 79–83.
Jacobs, J. E., & Becker, J. R. (1997). Creating a gender-equitable multicultural classroom using feminist pedagogy. In J. Trantacosta & M. J. Kenney (Eds.),Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity, 1997 Yearbook (pp. 107–114). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science talented rural adolescent girls.American Educational Research Journal, 35, 681–704.
Jones, C. (1998). Teacher supply crisis is looming.The Age, 3, 42–46.
Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. Grouws (Ed.),Handbook of research of mathematics education (pp. 597–622). New York: MacMillan.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (1998). Single-sex grouping for mathematics: An equitable solution. In C. Keitel (Ed.),Social justice and mathematics education: Gender, class, ethnicity, and the politics of schooling (pp. 162–179). Berlin: International Organisation of Women and Mathematics Education and Freie Universitat Berlin.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Mael, F. (1998). Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic development.Review of Educational Research, 68, 101–129.
Mendick, H. (2003). Choosing maths/doing gender: A look at why there are more boys than girls in advanced mathematics classes in England. In L. Burton (Ed.),Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 69–187). London: Praeger.
Mendick, H. (2004).Objective subjectivities, subjective objectivities and guilty pleasures: Exploring the possibilities of deconstructing the separated/connected opposition for thinking about gender and mathematics. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rogers, P. (1990). Thoughts on power and pedagogy. In L. Burton (Ed.),Gender and mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 38–46). New York: Cassell Education.
Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1996). Gender related differences in self referenced cognitions in relation to mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 215–240.
Spradley, J. P. (1980).Participant observation. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Stage, F. K., & Maple, S. A. (1996). Incompatible goals: Narratives of graduate women in the mathematics pipeline.American Educational Research Journal, 33, 23–51.
Stake, R. E. (1995).The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thomas, J. (2000).Mathematical sciences in Australia: Looking for a future. Canberra: Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies.
Willis, S. (1998). Perspectives on social justice, disadvantage, and the mathematics curriculum. In C. Keitel (Ed.),Social justice and mathematics education: Gender, class, ethnicity, and the politics of schooling (pp. 1–19). Berlin: International Organisation of Women and Mathematics Education and Freie Universitat Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steele, D.F., Levin, A.K., Blecksmith, R. et al. The calculus of differences: Effects of a psychosocial, cultural, and pedagogical intervention in an all women’s university calculus class. Math Ed Res J 17, 22–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217420
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217420