Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of arithmetic structure in the transition from arithmetic to algebra

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates students’ understanding of the associative law, commutative law, and addition and division as general processes after they have completed their primary school education. All these understandings are believed to assist successful transition from arithmetic to algebra. A written test was administered to 672 students. The results identified difficulties students are experiencing with these processes. Implications for teaching algebra at both primary and secondary levels are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Council for Educational Research. (1998).Australian year 12 students’ performance in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study: TIMSS Australian Monograph No. 3. Melbourne: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, L. (1989). A question of structure — a reaction to: Early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.),Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 20–32). Virginia, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, L. R. (1984).Algebra: Children’s strategies and errors. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton-Lewis, G., Cooper, T.J., Atweh, B., Pillay, H., & Wilss, L. (1998). Pre-algebra: A cognitive perspective. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.),Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference for Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 2, pp. 144–151). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braufield, P. (1973). The role of algebra in modern K-12 curriculum.International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science & Technology, 4(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T., & Franke, M. (2001). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school: Generalisation and proof. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent. (Eds.),The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (Proceedings of the 12th International Commission on Mathematics Instruction study conference, Vol. 1, pp. 155–162). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, K. F. (1974).Cognitive development of mathematics learning. Paper presented for the mPsychology of Mathematics Education Workshop, Shell Mathematics Unit Centre for Science Education, Chelsea College, University of London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, K., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. (1999). Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra.Teaching Children Mathematics. December, 232–236.

  • Filloy, E., & Sutherland, R. (1996). Designing curricula for teaching and learning algebra. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.),International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 139–160). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, S., & Rojano, T. (1987). Common difficulties in the learning of algebra by children displaying low and medium pre-algebraic proficiency levels. In L. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, & C. Kieran (Eds.),Proceedings of the 11 th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 301–307). Montreal, Canada: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1998). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by “algebrafying” the K-12 curriculum. In National Council of Teachers of Mathematics,The Nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning algebra. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.),Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (1990). Cognitive processes involved in learning school algebra. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition:A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 97–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In T. D. Grouws (Ed.),Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In Alsina et al. (Ed.)Selected lectures from the 7 th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Sevilla, Spain: FESPM. http:/www.math.uqam.ca/kieran/art/algebra.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C., & Chalouh, L. (1992). Prealgebra: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. In T. D. Owens (Ed.),Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, W., & Scott, L. (1970). An investigation of elementary structure in elementary school maths: Isomorphism.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(1), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1989). The arithmetic connection.Education Studies in Mathematics, 20, 4–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1994). Cognitive obstacles in pre-algebra.Proceedings of the 18 th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 176–183). Lisbon, Portugal: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodholz, R. D. (1993). The transition from arithmetic to algebra. In E. L. Edwards Jr. (Ed.),Algebra for everyone. Richmond, VA: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, M., & Price, E. (1999). Aspects of language proficiency and algebra learning.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (4), 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1995). The effect of different approaches to algebra on students’ perceptions of functional relationships.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. (1999). Developing concepts of mathematical structure: Pre-arithmetic reasoning versus extended arithmetic reasoning.Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(1), 44–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. (1998).The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston,VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, H., Wilss, L., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (1998). Sequential development of algebra knowledge: A cognitive analysis.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, C. (1994). Comparison of teaching methods in early algebra. In G. Bell and N. Lesson (Eds.),Challenges in mathematical education: Constraints on construction. (Proceedings of 17th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, (pp. 515–522). Lismore, NSW: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, L., & Malone, J. (1997). The effects of a computer algebra system on the learning of, and attitudes towards, mathematics, amongst engineering students in Papua New Guinea. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.),People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Vol. 2, pp. 429–435). Rotorua, NZ: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redden, E. (1996). “Wouldn’t it be good if we had a symbol to stand for any number”: The relationship between natural language and symbolic notation in pattern description. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.),Proceedings of the 20 th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 195–202). Valencia, Spain: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavitt, D. (1999). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebra thought.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (1996). Symbolising as a constructive activity in a computer microworld.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., & Clarke, D., (1991). Catering for all abilities through “good questions”.Arithmetic Teacher, 39 (2), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Warren, E., & White, P. (2000). Students’ responses to open ended mathematical tasks.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, J. (1989). Algebra: What should we teach and how should we teach it? In S. Wagner á C. Kieran (Eds.),Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 11–24). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S., & Parker, S. (1993). Advancing algebra. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.),Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 120–139). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren E. (2000). Primary children’s knowledge of arithmetic structure. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.),Mathematics education beyond 2000 (Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia vol. 2, pp. 624–631). Sydney: MERGA

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. (1997). Generalising from and transferring between algebraic representation systems. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.),People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Vol. 2, pp. 560–567). Rotorua, NZ: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McAuley Campus, Australian Catholic University, 1000 Nudgee Rd, PO Box 247, 4014, Banyo, QLD

    Elizabeth Warren

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warren, E. The role of arithmetic structure in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Math Ed Res J 15, 122–137 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217374

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217374

Keywords

Search

Navigation