Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal radio-tracking strategy — The best results with the least effort?

  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the need to radio-track nocturnal mammals, such as raccoon dogsNyctereutes procyonoides (Gray, 1834) and badgersMeles meles (Linnaeus, 1758), throughout the night for reliable estimates of home range size and habitat selection. We also tested the possibility to reduce the tracking effort by decreasing the number of tracking-nights. The results indicated that the locations collected before midnight gave good estimates of home range sizes but those collected after midnight or by reducing the number of tracking-nights resulted in smaller home ranges than those estimated using the total data. Thus, if one aims to estimate only the home range size, locations before midnight would be adequate. Locations of raccoon dogs taken only before or after midnight did not reveal all habitats, which were favoured on the basis of the total data. Although locations of badgers before midnight seemed to give correct results of habitat selection, we recommend radio-tracking also badgers at least few times through the night, because their core areas shifted during the night. In the case of badgers, but not of raccoon dogs, we obtained correct results of habitat selection by reducing the tracking effort by decreasing the number of tracking-nights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebischer N. L., Robertson P. A. and Kenward R. E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghli A. and Verhagen R. 2004. Home ranges and movement patterns in a vulnerable polecatMustela putorius population. Acta Theriologica 49: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börger L., Franconi N., De Michele G., Gantz A., Meschi F., Manica A., Lovari S. and Coulson T. 2006. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1393–1405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brøseth H., Knutsen B. and Bevanger K. 1997. Spatial organization and habitat utilization of badgersMeles meles: effects of food patch dispersion in the boreal forest of central Norway. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 62: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W. J. and Harris S. 1988. Foraging behaviour and home-range utilization in a suburban badger (Meles meles) population. Mammal Review 18: 37–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla S. R., Bonduriansky R. and Brooks R. J. 1999. Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drygala F., Zoller H., Stier N., Mix H. and Roth M. 2008. Ranging and parental care of the raccoon dogNyctereutes procyonoides during pup rearing. Acta Theriologica 53: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmeros M., Madsen A. B. and Prang A. 2005. Home range of the badger (Meles meles) in a heterogenous landscape in Denmark. Lutra 48: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansteen T. L., Andreassen H. P. and Ims R. A. 1997. Effects of spatiotemporal scale on autocorrelation and home range estimators. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris S., Cresswell W. J., Forde P. G., Trewhella W. J., Woollard T. and Wray S. 1990. Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data: a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review 20: 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich R. I. and Turner F. B. 1969. Measurement of noncircular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22: 227–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K. 1996. Habitat use of raccoon dogs,Nyctereutes procyonoides, in southern Finland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 61: 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K., Helle E. and Taskinen K. 1993a. Home range of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in southern Finland. Journal of Zoology, London 231: 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K., Hiltunen M. and Salonen T. 2005. Home ranges of mountain hares Lepus timidus in boreal forests of Finland. Wildlife Biology 11: 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K., Holmala K., Lammers W. and Schregel J. 2006. Home ranges and densities of medium-sized carnivores in south-east Finland, with special reference to rabies spread. Acta Theriologica 51: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K., Holmala K. and Schregel J. 2007. Seasonal activity patterns and movements of the raccoon dog, a vector a diseases and parasites, in southern Finland. Mammalian Biology 72: 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K., Kaunisto M. and Helle E. 1993b. Diet of the raccoon dog,Nyctereutes procyonoides, in Finland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 58: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K. and Tiilikainen T. 2002. Radio location error and the estimates of home-range size, movements, and habitat use: a simple field test. Annales Zoologici Fennici 39: 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward R. E., South A. B. and Walls S. S. 2003. Ranges6 v1.2: For the analysis of tracking and location data. Anatrack Ltd., Wareham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk R., Jędrzejewska B. and Zalewski A. 2003a. Annual and circadian activity patterns of badgers (Meles meles) in Białowieża Primeval Forest (eastern Poland) compared with other Palearctic populations. Journal of Biogeography 30: 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk R., Zalewski A. and Jędrzejewska B. 2006. Daily movement and territory use by badgersMeles meles in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. Wildlife Biology 12: 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk R, Zalewski A., Jędrzejewska B. and Jędrzejewski W. 2003b. Spatial organization and demography of badgers (Meles meles) in Białowie.za Primeval Forest, Poland, and the influence of earthworms on badger densities in Europe. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H. 1978. Foraging and spatial organisation of the European badger,Meles meles L. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 4: 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laundré J. W. and Keller B. L. 1984. Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laver P. N. and Kelly M. J. 2008. A critical review of home range studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 290–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustonen A-M., Asikainen J., Kauhala K., Paakkonen T. and Nieminen P. 2007. Seasonal rhythms of body temperature in the free-ranging raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) with special emphasis on winter sleep. Chronobiology International 24: 1095–1107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novikov G. A. 1962. Carnivorous mammals of the fauna of the USSR. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem: 159–162.

  • Okarma H., Jędrzejewski W., Schmidt K., Snieżko S., Bunevich A. N. and Jędrzejewska B. 1998. Home ranges of wolves in Białowie.za Primeval Forest, Poland, compared with other Eurasian populations. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 842–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palphramand K. L., Newton-Cross G. and White P. C. L. 2007. Spatial organization and behaviour of badgers (Meles meles) in a moderate-density population. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosalino L. M., Macdonald D. W. and Santos-Reis M. 2004. Spatial structure and land-cover use in a low-density Mediterranean population of Eurasian badgers. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82: 1493–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosalino L. M., Macdonald D. W. and Santos-Reis M. 2005. Activity rhythms, movements and patterns of sett use by badgers,Meles meles, in a Mediterranean woodland. Mammalia 69: 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosalino L. M., Santos M. J., Beier P. and Santos-Reis M. 2008. Eurasian badger habitat selection in Mediterranean environments: Does scale really matter? Mammalian Biology (2008), doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2007.02.004

  • Seaman D. E., Millspaugh J. J., Kernohan B. J., Brundige G. C., Raedeke K. J. and Gitzen R. A. 1999. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 739–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith G. J., Cary J. R. and Rongstad O. J. 1981. Sampling strategies for radio-tracking coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9: 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P. G. 2006. Compos analysis version 6.2. user’s guide. Version 6.2.3 Smith Ecology Ltd., 1 Bettws Cottage, Bettws, Abergavenny, NP7 7LG, UK. i + 22 pp. [WWW document]. URL http://www.smithecology.com/software.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauters L. A., Preatoni D. G., Molinari A. and Tosi G. 2007. Radio-tracking squirrels: Performance of home range density and linkage estimators with small range and sample size. Ecological Modelling 202: 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worton B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Associate editor was Andrzej Zalewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kauhala, K., Holmala, K. Optimal radio-tracking strategy — The best results with the least effort?. Acta Theriol 53, 333–341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195194

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195194

Key words

Navigation